The Contestation of Tech Ethics: A Sociotechnical Approach to Ethics and Technology in Action

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2106.01784v1
• Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2021 12:16:08 GMT
• Title: The Contestation of Tech Ethics: A Sociotechnical Approach to Ethics and Technology in Action
• Authors: Ben Green
• Abstract summary: Ethics discourse has proliferated across the world of digital technologies. Tech ethics is vague and toothless, subsumed into corporate logics and incentives. I recast tech ethics as a terrain of contestation where the central fault line is not whether it is desirable to be ethical, but what "ethics" entails and who gets to define it.
• Score: 3.42658286826597
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Recent controversies related to topics such as fake news, privacy, and algorithmic bias have prompted increased public scrutiny of digital technologies and soul-searching among many of the people associated with their development. In response, the tech industry, academia, civil society, and governments have rapidly increased their attention to "ethics" in the design and use of digital technologies ("tech ethics"). Yet almost as quickly as ethics discourse has proliferated across the world of digital technologies, the limitations of these approaches have also become apparent: tech ethics is vague and toothless, is subsumed into corporate logics and incentives, and has a myopic focus on individual engineers and technology design rather than on the structures and cultures of technology production. As a result of these limitations, many have grown skeptical of tech ethics and its proponents, charging them with "ethics-washing": promoting ethics research and discourse to defuse criticism and government regulation without committing to ethical behavior. By looking at how ethics has been taken up in both science and business in superficial and depoliticizing ways, I recast tech ethics as a terrain of contestation where the central fault line is not whether it is desirable to be ethical, but what "ethics" entails and who gets to define it. This framing highlights the significant limits of current approaches to tech ethics and the importance of studying the formulation and real-world effects of tech ethics. In order to identify and develop more rigorous strategies for reforming digital technologies and the social relations that they mediate, I describe a sociotechnical approach to tech ethics, one that reflexively applies many of tech ethics' own lessons regarding digital technologies to tech ethics itself.

Related papers

• Now, Later, and Lasting: Ten Priorities for AI Research, Policy, and Practice [63.20307830884542]
  Next several decades may well be a turning point for humanity, comparable to the industrial revolution. Launched a decade ago, the project is committed to a perpetual series of studies by multidisciplinary experts. We offer ten recommendations for action that collectively address both the short- and long-term potential impacts of AI technologies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-06T22:18:31Z)
• Introduction to ethics in the age of digital communication [1.922823221013346]
  This article serves as an introduction to ethics in the field of digital communication. It gives a brief overview of applied ethics as a practical sub-field of ethics. The article also discusses the ways in which the nature of ethics in the field of communication has been changing, and the impact of emerging technology on these changes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-28T09:03:15Z)
• Walking the Walk of AI Ethics: Organizational Challenges and the Individualization of Risk among Ethics Entrepreneurs [0.0]
  We find that workers experience an environment where policies, practices, and outcomes are decoupled. We analyze AI ethics workers as ethics entrepreneurs who work to institutionalize new ethics-related practices within organizations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-16T16:11:24Z)
• On the Efficiency of Ethics as a Governing Tool for Artificial Intelligence [0.0]
  Artificial Intelligence Ethics and Safety is an emerging research field that has been gaining popularity in recent years. Several private, public and non-governmental organizations have published guidelines proposing ethical principles for regulating the use and development of autonomous intelligent systems. We would like to conduct a critical analysis of the current state of AI Ethics and suggest that this form of governance is not sufficient to norm the AI industry and its developers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-27T09:46:33Z)
• Metaethical Perspectives on 'Benchmarking' AI Ethics [81.65697003067841]
  Benchmarks are seen as the cornerstone for measuring technical progress in Artificial Intelligence (AI) research. An increasingly prominent research area in AI is ethics, which currently has no set of benchmarks nor commonly accepted way for measuring the 'ethicality' of an AI system. We argue that it makes more sense to talk about 'values' rather than 'ethics' when considering the possible actions of present and future AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-11T14:36:39Z)
• Technology Ethics in Action: Critical and Interdisciplinary Perspectives [0.0]
  In response to concerns about the social harms associated with digital technologies, many individuals and institutions have articulated the need for a greater emphasis on ethics in digital technology. This interdisciplinary issue takes up these questions, interrogating the relationships among ethics, technology, and society in action.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-03T00:41:53Z)
• Confucius, Cyberpunk and Mr. Science: Comparing AI ethics between China and the EU [41.19326726478421]
  A major concern is the large homogeneity and presumed consensualism around these principles. We propose to analyse and compare the ethical principles endorsed by the Chinese National New Generation Artificial Intelligence Governance Professional Committee and those elaborated by the European High-level Expert Group on AI (HLEGAI) In our analysis, we wish to highlight that principles that seem similar a priori may actually have different meanings, derived from different approaches and reflect distinct goals.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-15T06:38:33Z)
• A Word on Machine Ethics: A Response to Jiang et al. (2021) [36.955224006838584]
  We focus on a single case study of the recently proposed Delphi model and offer a critique of the project's proposed method of automating morality judgments. We conclude with a discussion of how machine ethics could usefully proceed, by focusing on current and near-future uses of technology.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-07T19:31:51Z)
• Building Bridges: Generative Artworks to Explore AI Ethics [56.058588908294446]
  In recent years, there has been an increased emphasis on understanding and mitigating adverse impacts of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies on society. A significant challenge in the design of ethical AI systems is that there are multiple stakeholders in the AI pipeline, each with their own set of constraints and interests. This position paper outlines some potential ways in which generative artworks can play this role by serving as accessible and powerful educational tools.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-25T22:31:55Z)
• The Short Anthropological Guide to the Study of Ethical AI [91.3755431537592]
  Short guide serves as both an introduction to AI ethics and social science and anthropological perspectives on the development of AI. Aims to provide those unfamiliar with the field with an insight into the societal impact of AI systems and how, in turn, these systems can lead us to rethink how our world operates.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-07T12:25:03Z)
• Ethics in the digital era [0.0]
  Ethics is an ancient matter for human kind, from the origin of civilizations ethics have been related with the most relevant human concerns and determined cultures. The undergoing digital revolution enabled by Artificial Intelligence and Data are bringing ethical wicked problems in the social application of these technologies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-14T01:32:11Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.