Post-hoc loss-calibration for Bayesian neural networks

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2106.06997v1
• Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2021 13:53:27 GMT
• Title: Post-hoc loss-calibration for Bayesian neural networks
• Authors: Meet P. Vadera, Soumya Ghosh, Kenney Ng, Benjamin M. Marlin
• Abstract summary: We develop methods for correcting approximate posterior predictive distributions encouraging them to prefer high-utility decisions. In contrast to previous work, our approach is agnostic to the choice of the approximate inference algorithm.
• Score: 25.05373000435213
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Bayesian decision theory provides an elegant framework for acting optimally under uncertainty when tractable posterior distributions are available. Modern Bayesian models, however, typically involve intractable posteriors that are approximated with, potentially crude, surrogates. This difficulty has engendered loss-calibrated techniques that aim to learn posterior approximations that favor high-utility decisions. In this paper, focusing on Bayesian neural networks, we develop methods for correcting approximate posterior predictive distributions encouraging them to prefer high-utility decisions. In contrast to previous work, our approach is agnostic to the choice of the approximate inference algorithm, allows for efficient test time decision making through amortization, and empirically produces higher quality decisions. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach through controlled experiments spanning a diversity of tasks and datasets.

Related papers

• Offline Bayesian Aleatoric and Epistemic Uncertainty Quantification and Posterior Value Optimisation in Finite-State MDPs [3.1139806580181006]
  We address the challenge of quantifying Bayesian uncertainty in offline use cases of finite-state Markov Decision Processes (MDPs) with unknown dynamics. We use standard Bayesian reinforcement learning methods to capture the posterior uncertainty in MDP parameters. We then analytically compute the first two moments of the return distribution across posterior samples and apply the law of total variance. We highlight the real-world impact and computational scalability of our method by applying it to the AI Clinician problem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-04T16:21:14Z)
• Model-Free Local Recalibration of Neural Networks [0.0]
  Uncalibrated probabilistic forecasts are of limited use for many important decision-making tasks. We propose a localized recalibration of ANN predictive distributions using the dimension-reduced representation of the input. We show that our method has good performance compared to alternative approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-09T01:58:45Z)
• Model-Based Epistemic Variance of Values for Risk-Aware Policy Optimization [59.758009422067]
  We consider the problem of quantifying uncertainty over expected cumulative rewards in model-based reinforcement learning. We propose a new uncertainty Bellman equation (UBE) whose solution converges to the true posterior variance over values. We introduce a general-purpose policy optimization algorithm, Q-Uncertainty Soft Actor-Critic (QU-SAC) that can be applied for either risk-seeking or risk-averse policy optimization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-07T15:55:58Z)
• Calibrating Neural Simulation-Based Inference with Differentiable Coverage Probability [50.44439018155837]
  We propose to include a calibration term directly into the training objective of the neural model. By introducing a relaxation of the classical formulation of calibration error we enable end-to-end backpropagation. It is directly applicable to existing computational pipelines allowing reliable black-box posterior inference.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-20T10:20:45Z)
• Bi-objective Ranking and Selection Using Stochastic Kriging [0.0]
  We consider bi-objective ranking and selection problems in which the two objective outcomes have been observed with uncertainty. We propose a novel Bayesian bi-objective ranking and selection method that sequentially allocates extra samples to competitive solutions. Experimental results show that the proposed method outperforms the standard allocation method, as well as a well-known state-of-the-art algorithm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-05T23:51:07Z)
• Learning MDPs from Features: Predict-Then-Optimize for Sequential Decision Problems by Reinforcement Learning [52.74071439183113]
  We study the predict-then-optimize framework in the context of sequential decision problems (formulated as MDPs) solved via reinforcement learning. Two significant computational challenges arise in applying decision-focused learning to MDPs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-06T23:53:31Z)
• Towards Trustworthy Predictions from Deep Neural Networks with Fast Adversarial Calibration [2.8935588665357077]
  We propose an efficient yet general modelling approach for obtaining well-calibrated, trustworthy probabilities for samples obtained after a domain shift. We introduce a new training strategy combining an entropy-encouraging loss term with an adversarial calibration loss term and demonstrate that this results in well-calibrated and technically trustworthy predictions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-20T13:39:29Z)
• Efficient Variational Inference for Sparse Deep Learning with Theoretical Guarantee [20.294908538266867]
  Sparse deep learning aims to address the challenge of huge storage consumption by deep neural networks. In this paper, we train sparse deep neural networks with a fully Bayesian treatment under spike-and-slab priors. We develop a set of computationally efficient variational inferences via continuous relaxation of Bernoulli distribution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-15T03:27:54Z)
• Robust, Accurate Stochastic Optimization for Variational Inference [68.83746081733464]
  We show that common optimization methods lead to poor variational approximations if the problem is moderately large. Motivated by these findings, we develop a more robust and accurate optimization framework by viewing the underlying algorithm as producing a Markov chain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-01T19:12:11Z)
• Unlabelled Data Improves Bayesian Uncertainty Calibration under Covariate Shift [100.52588638477862]
  We develop an approximate Bayesian inference scheme based on posterior regularisation. We demonstrate the utility of our method in the context of transferring prognostic models of prostate cancer across globally diverse populations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-26T13:50:19Z)
• Bayesian Deep Learning and a Probabilistic Perspective of Generalization [56.69671152009899]
  We show that deep ensembles provide an effective mechanism for approximate Bayesian marginalization. We also propose a related approach that further improves the predictive distribution by marginalizing within basins of attraction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-20T15:13:27Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.