Dynamically Adjusting Case Reporting Policy to Maximize Privacy and
Utility in the Face of a Pandemic
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2106.14649v2
- Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2022 16:38:22 GMT
- Title: Dynamically Adjusting Case Reporting Policy to Maximize Privacy and
Utility in the Face of a Pandemic
- Authors: J. Thomas Brown, Chao Yan, Weiyi Xia, Zhijun Yin, Zhiyu Wan, Aris
Gkoulalas-Divanis, Murat Kantarcioglu, Bradley A. Malin
- Abstract summary: Current de-identification approaches are inefficient, relying on retrospective disclosure risk assessments.
We introduce a framework to dynamically adapt de-identification for near-real time sharing of person-level surveillance data.
- Score: 16.486088007516102
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Supporting public health research and the public's situational awareness
during a pandemic requires continuous dissemination of infectious disease
surveillance data. Legislation, such as the Health Insurance Portability and
Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA) and recent state-level regulations, permits
sharing de-identified person-level data; however, current de-identification
approaches are limited. namely, they are inefficient, relying on retrospective
disclosure risk assessments, and do not flex with changes in infection rates or
population demographics over time. In this paper, we introduce a framework to
dynamically adapt de-identification for near-real time sharing of person-level
surveillance data. The framework leverages a simulation mechanism, capable of
application at any geographic level, to forecast the re-identification risk of
sharing the data under a wide range of generalization policies. The estimates
inform weekly, prospective policy selection to maintain the proportion of
records corresponding to a group size less than 11 (PK11) at or below 0.1.
Fixing the policy at the start of each week facilitates timely dataset updates
and supports sharing granular date information. We use August 2020 through
October 2021 case data from Johns Hopkins University and the Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention to demonstrate the framework's effectiveness in
maintaining the PK!1 threshold of 0.01. When sharing COVID-19 county-level case
data across all US counties, the framework's approach meets the threshold for
96.2% of daily data releases, while a policy based on current de-identification
techniques meets the threshold for 32.3%. Periodically adapting the data
publication policies preserves privacy while enhancing public health utility
through timely updates and sharing epidemiologically critical features.
Related papers
- Generation and De-Identification of Indian Clinical Discharge Summaries using LLMs [3.8895618250348116]
Average financial impact of a data breach in recent months has been estimated to be close to USD 10 million.
Computer-based systems for de-identification of personal information are vulnerable to data drift.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-08T12:47:03Z) - Evaluating COVID-19 vaccine allocation policies using Bayesian $m$-top
exploration [53.122045119395594]
We present a novel technique for evaluating vaccine allocation strategies using a multi-armed bandit framework.
$m$-top exploration allows the algorithm to learn $m$ policies for which it expects the highest utility.
We consider the Belgian COVID-19 epidemic using the individual-based model STRIDE, where we learn a set of vaccination policies.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-01-30T12:22:30Z) - Adversarial Learning-based Stance Classifier for COVID-19-related Health
Policies [14.558584240713154]
We propose an adversarial learning-based stance classifier to automatically identify the public's attitudes toward COVID-19-related health policies.
To enhance the model's deeper understanding, we incorporate policy descriptions as external knowledge into the model.
We evaluate the performance of a broad range of baselines on the stance detection task for COVID-19-related health policies.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-09-10T10:27:21Z) - Privacy-Preserving Epidemiological Modeling on Mobile Graphs [17.085245461105863]
We present RIPPLE, a privacy-preserving epidemiological modeling framework.
We also present PIR-SUM, a novel extension to private information retrieval.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-01T14:51:17Z) - Leveraging Administrative Data for Bias Audits: Assessing Disparate
Coverage with Mobility Data for COVID-19 Policy [61.60099467888073]
We show how linking administrative data can enable auditing mobility data for bias.
We show that older and non-white voters are less likely to be captured by mobility data.
We show that allocating public health resources based on such mobility data could disproportionately harm high-risk elderly and minority groups.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-11-14T02:04:14Z) - Epidemic mitigation by statistical inference from contact tracing data [61.04165571425021]
We develop Bayesian inference methods to estimate the risk that an individual is infected.
We propose to use probabilistic risk estimation in order to optimize testing and quarantining strategies for the control of an epidemic.
Our approaches translate into fully distributed algorithms that only require communication between individuals who have recently been in contact.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-09-20T12:24:45Z) - Go local: The key to controlling the COVID-19 pandemic in the post
lockdown era [1.8216415173779263]
The UK government announced its first wave of lockdown easing on 10 May 2020, two months after the non-pharmaceutical measures to reduce the spread of COVID-19 were first introduced on 23 March 2020.
Analysis of reported case rate data from Public Health England and aggregated and anonymised crowd level mobility data shows variability across local authorities in the UK.
A locality-based approach to lockdown easing is needed, enabling local public health and associated health and social care services to rapidly respond to emerging hotspots of infection.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-07-06T09:23:16Z) - COVI White Paper [67.04578448931741]
Contact tracing is an essential tool to change the course of the Covid-19 pandemic.
We present an overview of the rationale, design, ethical considerations and privacy strategy of COVI,' a Covid-19 public peer-to-peer contact tracing and risk awareness mobile application developed in Canada.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-05-18T07:40:49Z) - When and How to Lift the Lockdown? Global COVID-19 Scenario Analysis and
Policy Assessment using Compartmental Gaussian Processes [111.69190108272133]
coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) global pandemic has led many countries to impose unprecedented lockdown measures.
Data-driven models that predict COVID-19 fatalities under different lockdown policy scenarios are essential.
This paper develops a Bayesian model for predicting the effects of COVID-19 lockdown policies in a global context.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-05-13T18:21:50Z) - Digital Ariadne: Citizen Empowerment for Epidemic Control [55.41644538483948]
The COVID-19 crisis represents the most dangerous threat to public health since the H1N1 pandemic of 1918.
Technology-assisted location and contact tracing, if broadly adopted, may help limit the spread of infectious diseases.
We present a tool, called 'diAry' or 'digital Ariadne', based on voluntary location and Bluetooth tracking on personal devices.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-04-16T15:53:42Z) - A County-level Dataset for Informing the United States' Response to
COVID-19 [5.682299443164938]
We present a dataset that aggregates relevant data from governmental, journalistic, and academic sources on the U.S. county level.
Our dataset contains more than 300 variables that summarize population estimates, demographics, ethnicity, housing, education, employment and income, climate, transit, scores, and healthcare system-related metrics.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-04-01T05:07:27Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.