Scarecrow: A Framework for Scrutinizing Machine Text

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2107.01294v1
• Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2021 22:37:03 GMT
• Title: Scarecrow: A Framework for Scrutinizing Machine Text
• Authors: Yao Dou, Maxwell Forbes, Rik Koncel-Kedziorski, Noah A.Smith, Yejin Choi
• Abstract summary: We introduce a new structured, crowdsourced error annotation schema called Scarecrow. Scarecrow collects 13k annotations of 1.3k human and machine generate paragraphs of English language news text. These findings demonstrate the value of Scarecrow annotations in the assessment of current and future text generation systems.
• Score: 69.26985439191151
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Modern neural text generation systems can produce remarkably fluent and grammatical texts. While earlier language models suffered from repetition and syntactic errors, the errors made by contemporary models are often semantic, narrative, or discourse failures. To facilitate research of these complex error types, we introduce a new structured, crowdsourced error annotation schema called Scarecrow. The error categories used in Scarecrow -- such as redundancy, commonsense errors, and incoherence -- were identified by combining expert analysis with several pilot rounds of ontology-free crowd annotation to arrive at a schema which covers the error phenomena found in real machine generated text. We use Scarecrow to collect 13k annotations of 1.3k human and machine generate paragraphs of English language news text, amounting to over 41k spans each labeled with its error category, severity, a natural language explanation, and antecedent span (where relevant). We collect annotations for text generated by state-of-the-art systems with varying known performance levels, from GPT-2 Small through the largest GPT-3. We isolate several factors for detailed analysis, including parameter count, training data, and decoding technique. Our results show both expected and surprising differences across these settings. These findings demonstrate the value of Scarecrow annotations in the assessment of current and future text generation systems. We release our complete annotation toolkit and dataset at https://yao-dou.github.io/scarecrow/.

Related papers

• A Comprehensive Approach to Misspelling Correction with BERT and Levenshtein Distance [1.7000578646860536]
  Spelling mistakes, among the most prevalent writing errors, are frequently encountered due to various factors. This research aims to identify and rectify diverse spelling errors in text using neural networks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-24T16:07:11Z)
• MISMATCH: Fine-grained Evaluation of Machine-generated Text with Mismatch Error Types [68.76742370525234]
  We propose a new evaluation scheme to model human judgments in 7 NLP tasks, based on the fine-grained mismatches between a pair of texts. Inspired by the recent efforts in several NLP tasks for fine-grained evaluation, we introduce a set of 13 mismatch error types. We show that the mismatch errors between the sentence pairs on the held-out datasets from 7 NLP tasks align well with the human evaluation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-18T01:38:53Z)
• Towards Fine-Grained Information: Identifying the Type and Location of Translation Errors [80.22825549235556]
  Existing approaches can not synchronously consider error position and type. We build an FG-TED model to predict the textbf addition and textbfomission errors. Experiments show that our model can identify both error type and position concurrently, and gives state-of-the-art results.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-17T16:20:33Z)
• On the Blind Spots of Model-Based Evaluation Metrics for Text Generation [79.01422521024834]
  We explore a useful but often neglected methodology for robustness analysis of text generation evaluation metrics. We design and synthesize a wide range of potential errors and check whether they result in a commensurate drop in the metric scores. Our experiments reveal interesting insensitivities, biases, or even loopholes in existing metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-20T06:24:25Z)
• Annotation Error Detection: Analyzing the Past and Present for a More Coherent Future [63.99570204416711]
  We reimplement 18 methods for detecting potential annotation errors and evaluate them on 9 English datasets. We define a uniform evaluation setup including a new formalization of the annotation error detection task. We release our datasets and implementations in an easy-to-use and open source software package.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-05T22:31:45Z)
• Neural Text Generation with Artificial Negative Examples [7.187858820534111]
  We propose to suppress an arbitrary type of errors by training the text generation model in a reinforcement learning framework. We use a trainable reward function that is capable of discriminating between references and sentences containing the targeted type of errors. The experimental results show that our method can suppress the generation errors and achieve significant improvements on two machine translation and two image captioning tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-28T07:25:10Z)
• On the Robustness of Language Encoders against Grammatical Errors [66.05648604987479]
  We collect real grammatical errors from non-native speakers and conduct adversarial attacks to simulate these errors on clean text data. Results confirm that the performance of all tested models is affected but the degree of impact varies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-12T11:01:44Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.