The violation of Bell-CHSH inequalities leads to different conclusions
depending on the description used
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2107.02808v1
- Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2021 18:00:01 GMT
- Title: The violation of Bell-CHSH inequalities leads to different conclusions
depending on the description used
- Authors: Aldo F.G. Solis-Labastida, Melina Gastelum and Jorge G. Hirsch
- Abstract summary: The hypothesis from which Bell's inequalities are derived differ according to the probability space used to write them.
The violation of Bell's inequalities can, alternatively, be explained assuming that the hidden variables do not exist at all.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Since the experimental observation of the violation of the Bell-CHSH
inequalities, much has been said about the non-local and contextual character
of the underlying system. But the hypothesis from which Bell's inequalities are
derived differ according to the probability space used to write them. The
violation of Bell's inequalities can, alternatively, be explained assuming that
the hidden variables do not exist at all, or that they exist but their values
cannot be simultaneously assigned, or that the values can be assigned but joint
probabilities cannot be properly defined, or that averages taken in different
contexts cannot be combined. All of the above are valid options, selected by
different communities to provide support to their particular research program.
Related papers
- Some consequences of Sica's approach to Bell's inequalities [55.2480439325792]
Louis Sica derived Bell's inequalities from the hypothesis that the time series of outcomes observed in one station does not change if the setting in the other station is changed.
In this paper, Sica's approach is extended to series with non ideal efficiency and to the actual time structure of experimental data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-05T13:59:52Z) - Nonparametric Identifiability of Causal Representations from Unknown
Interventions [63.1354734978244]
We study causal representation learning, the task of inferring latent causal variables and their causal relations from mixtures of the variables.
Our goal is to identify both the ground truth latents and their causal graph up to a set of ambiguities which we show to be irresolvable from interventional data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-01T10:51:58Z) - What in fact proves the violation of the Bell-type inequalities? [0.0]
In a measurement in which some variables are tested, other variables, not tested, have no defined value.
It is proved that the correct conclusion of the violation of the CHSH inequality is different.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-15T10:36:32Z) - Is a spectrograph of hidden variables possible? [91.3755431537592]
"Spectrograph's Realism", and "Locality", are proven to be different, and both necessary, hypotheses to derive Bell's inequalities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-02-28T13:59:08Z) - Bounding Counterfactuals under Selection Bias [60.55840896782637]
We propose a first algorithm to address both identifiable and unidentifiable queries.
We prove that, in spite of the missingness induced by the selection bias, the likelihood of the available data is unimodal.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-07-26T10:33:10Z) - Bell-type inequalities for systems of relativistic vector bosons [0.0]
We analyze the possible violation of various Bell-type inequalities for systems of boson-antiboson pairs.
The degree of violation depends on the relative speed of the two particles.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-04-23T12:42:04Z) - Remarks on the use of objective probabilities in Bell-CHSH inequalities [0.0]
We explore the axioms which can be deduced from two widely used objetive probability theories: frequentism and propensities.
One of the strongest objections in the deduction of one version of Bell inequalities goes about the probability space.
It is shown that frequentism rejects the possibility of using counterfactual situations, while long-run propensities allow their use.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-02-16T21:59:52Z) - Violation of Bell inequalities by stochastic simulations of Gaussian
States based on their positive Wigner representation [0.0]
We study the use of an everywhere positive Wigner function as a probability density to perform simulations in quantum optics.
Because of the difference between symmetrically and normally ordered operators, some trajectories in simulations can imply negative intensities, despite a positive mean.
For the case of the Clauser-Horn Bell inequality, the influence of the quantum efficiency of the detectors is studied.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-06-28T08:12:27Z) - Non-Boolean Hidden Variables model reproduces Quantum Mechanics'
predictions for Bell's experiment [91.3755431537592]
Theory aimed to violate Bell's inequalities must start by giving up Boolean logic.
"Hard" problem is to predict the time values when single particles are detected.
"Soft" problem is to explain the violation of Bell's inequalities within (non-Boolean) Local Realism.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-05-20T21:46:35Z) - On the three types of Bell's inequalities [0.0]
I will argue that the violation of Bell's inequalities has different meanings in the three cases.
In the first case it rules out the interpretation of certain numbers as probabilities of events.
In the second case it rules out a common causal explanation of conditional correlations of certain events.
In the third case the violation neither rules out the interpretation of these numbers as probabilities of events nor a common causal explanation of the correlations between these events.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-04-29T10:11:24Z) - Using Randomness to decide among Locality, Realism and Ergodicity [91.3755431537592]
An experiment is proposed to find out, or at least to get an indication about, which one is false.
The results of such experiment would be important not only to the foundations of Quantum Mechanics.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-01-06T19:26:32Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.