Recent Advances in Leveraging Human Guidance for Sequential Decision-Making Tasks

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2107.05825v1
• Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2021 03:11:04 GMT
• Title: Recent Advances in Leveraging Human Guidance for Sequential Decision-Making Tasks
• Authors: Ruohan Zhang, Faraz Torabi, Garrett Warnell, Peter Stone
• Abstract summary: A longstanding goal of artificial intelligence is to create artificial agents capable of learning to perform tasks that require sequential decision making. While it is the artificial agent that learns and acts, it is still up to humans to specify the particular task to be performed. This survey provides a high-level overview of five recent machine learning frameworks that primarily rely on human guidance.
• Score: 60.380501589764144
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: A longstanding goal of artificial intelligence is to create artificial agents capable of learning to perform tasks that require sequential decision making. Importantly, while it is the artificial agent that learns and acts, it is still up to humans to specify the particular task to be performed. Classical task-specification approaches typically involve humans providing stationary reward functions or explicit demonstrations of the desired tasks. However, there has recently been a great deal of research energy invested in exploring alternative ways in which humans may guide learning agents that may, e.g., be more suitable for certain tasks or require less human effort. This survey provides a high-level overview of five recent machine learning frameworks that primarily rely on human guidance apart from pre-specified reward functions or conventional, step-by-step action demonstrations. We review the motivation, assumptions, and implementation of each framework, and we discuss possible future research directions.

Related papers

• Learning to Assist Humans without Inferring Rewards [65.28156318196397]
  We build upon prior work that studies assistance through the lens of empowerment. An assistive agent aims to maximize the influence of the human's actions. We prove that these representations estimate a similar notion of empowerment to that studied by prior work.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-04T21:31:04Z)
• Can Foundation Models Watch, Talk and Guide You Step by Step to Make a Cake? [62.59699229202307]
  Despite advances in AI, it remains a significant challenge to develop interactive task guidance systems. We created a new multimodal benchmark dataset, Watch, Talk and Guide (WTaG) based on natural interaction between a human user and a human instructor. We leveraged several foundation models to study to what extent these models can be quickly adapted to perceptually enabled task guidance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-01T15:13:49Z)
• Generalizing to New Tasks via One-Shot Compositional Subgoals [23.15624959305799]
  The ability to generalize to previously unseen tasks with little to no supervision is a key challenge in modern machine learning research. We introduce CASE which attempts to address these issues by training an Imitation Learning agent using adaptive "near future" subgoals. Our experiments show that the proposed approach consistently outperforms the previous state-of-the-art compositional Imitation Learning approach by 30%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-16T14:30:11Z)
• Behavior Self-Organization Supports Task Inference for Continual Robot Learning [18.071689266826212]
  We propose a novel approach to continual learning of robotic control tasks. Our approach performs unsupervised learning of behavior embeddings by incrementally self-organizing demonstrated behaviors. Unlike previous approaches, our approach makes no assumptions about task distribution and requires no task exploration to infer tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-09T16:37:27Z)
• LEMMA: A Multi-view Dataset for Learning Multi-agent Multi-task Activities [119.88381048477854]
  We introduce the LEMMA dataset to provide a single home to address missing dimensions with meticulously designed settings. We densely annotate the atomic-actions with human-object interactions to provide ground-truths of the compositionality, scheduling, and assignment of daily activities. We hope this effort would drive the machine vision community to examine goal-directed human activities and further study the task scheduling and assignment in the real world.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-31T00:13:54Z)
• Automatic Curriculum Learning through Value Disagreement [95.19299356298876]
  Continually solving new, unsolved tasks is the key to learning diverse behaviors. In the multi-task domain, where an agent needs to reach multiple goals, the choice of training goals can largely affect sample efficiency. We propose setting up an automatic curriculum for goals that the agent needs to solve. We evaluate our method across 13 multi-goal robotic tasks and 5 navigation tasks, and demonstrate performance gains over current state-of-the-art methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-17T03:58:25Z)
• Planning to Explore via Self-Supervised World Models [120.31359262226758]
  Plan2Explore is a self-supervised reinforcement learning agent. We present a new approach to self-supervised exploration and fast adaptation to new tasks. Without any training supervision or task-specific interaction, Plan2Explore outperforms prior self-supervised exploration methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-12T17:59:45Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.