Arbitrary Measurement dependence in tripartite non-locality
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2107.12495v1
- Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2021 22:13:57 GMT
- Title: Arbitrary Measurement dependence in tripartite non-locality
- Authors: Sk Sahadat Hossain, Mostak Kamal Molla, Amit Kundu, Biswajit Paul,
Indrani Chattopadhyay and Debasis Sarkar
- Abstract summary: We study the minimum degree of relaxation required to simulate violations of various well-known tripartite Bell inequalities.
Local deterministic models are also provided to achieve the violations of these Bell inequalities.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: The assumption of measurement independence is required for a local
deterministic model to conduct a Bell test. The violation of a Bell inequality
by such a model implies that this assumption must be relaxed. The degree to
which the assumption needs to be relaxed to achieve violation of some bipartite
Bell inequalities, has been investigated recently in [Phys. Rev. Lett. 105,
250404(2010), Phys. Rev. A 99, 012121(2019)]. In this work, we study the
minimum degree of relaxation required to simulate violations of various
well-known tripartite Bell inequalities and opens the possibility of relaxation
in multipartite scenario. Local deterministic models are also provided to
achieve the violations of these Bell inequalities.
Related papers
- Relaxed Quantile Regression: Prediction Intervals for Asymmetric Noise [51.87307904567702]
Quantile regression is a leading approach for obtaining such intervals via the empirical estimation of quantiles in the distribution of outputs.
We propose Relaxed Quantile Regression (RQR), a direct alternative to quantile regression based interval construction that removes this arbitrary constraint.
We demonstrate that this added flexibility results in intervals with an improvement in desirable qualities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-05T13:36:38Z) - Some consequences of Sica's approach to Bell's inequalities [55.2480439325792]
Louis Sica derived Bell's inequalities from the hypothesis that the time series of outcomes observed in one station does not change if the setting in the other station is changed.
In this paper, Sica's approach is extended to series with non ideal efficiency and to the actual time structure of experimental data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-05T13:59:52Z) - Is a spectrograph of hidden variables possible? [91.3755431537592]
"Spectrograph's Realism", and "Locality", are proven to be different, and both necessary, hypotheses to derive Bell's inequalities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-02-28T13:59:08Z) - An Appropriate Probability Model for the Bell Experiment [0.0]
The Bell inequality constrains the outcomes of measurements on pairs of distant entangled particles.
The Bell contradiction states that the Bell inequality is inconsistent with the calculated outcomes of these quantum experiments.
This paper proposes an appropriate probability model for the Bell experiment.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-02-10T11:08:23Z) - Bell inequality violations with random mutually unbiased bases [0.0]
We investigate the problem of exhibiting Bell nonlocality for a two-qudit entangled pure state using a randomly chosen set of mutually unbiased bases.
We find that even if we employ only two-setting Bell inequalities, we find a significant chance of obtaining a Bell violation if the two parties are individually allowed to measure a sufficient number of MUBs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-05-09T04:51:30Z) - Experimentally adjudicating between different causal accounts of Bell
inequality violations via statistical model selection [0.0]
Bell inequalities follow from a set of seemingly natural assumptions about how to provide a causal model of a Bell experiment.
Two types of causal models that modify some of these assumptions have been proposed.
We seek to adjudicate between these alternatives based on their predictive power.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-07-30T19:33:02Z) - Violations of locality and free choice are equivalent resources in Bell
experiments [0.0]
Bell inequalities rest on three fundamental assumptions: realism, locality, and free choice.
We investigate the extent to which a given assumption needs to be relaxed for the other to hold at all costs.
Despite their disparate character, we show that both assumptions are equally costly.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-05-19T10:04:38Z) - Witnessing Bell violations through probabilistic negativity [0.0]
Bell's theorem shows that no hidden-variable model can explain the measurement statistics of a quantum system shared between two parties.
We show that by relaxing the positivity restriction in the hidden-variable probability distribution it is possible to derive quasiprobabilistic Bell inequalities whose sharp upper bound is written in terms of a negativity witness.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-05-04T18:11:56Z) - Non-Boolean Hidden Variables model reproduces Quantum Mechanics'
predictions for Bell's experiment [91.3755431537592]
Theory aimed to violate Bell's inequalities must start by giving up Boolean logic.
"Hard" problem is to predict the time values when single particles are detected.
"Soft" problem is to explain the violation of Bell's inequalities within (non-Boolean) Local Realism.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-05-20T21:46:35Z) - Using Randomness to decide among Locality, Realism and Ergodicity [91.3755431537592]
An experiment is proposed to find out, or at least to get an indication about, which one is false.
The results of such experiment would be important not only to the foundations of Quantum Mechanics.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-01-06T19:26:32Z) - Bell's theorem for trajectories [62.997667081978825]
A trajectory is not an outcome of a quantum measurement, in the sense that there is no observable associated with it.
We show how to overcome this problem by considering a special case of our generic inequality that can be experimentally tested point-by-point in time.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-01-03T01:40:44Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.