Machine learning reveals how personalized climate communication can both
succeed and backfire
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2109.05104v1
- Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2021 20:47:34 GMT
- Title: Machine learning reveals how personalized climate communication can both
succeed and backfire
- Authors: Totte Harinen, Alexandre Filipowicz, Shabnam Hakimi, Rumen Iliev,
Matthew Klenk, Emily Sumner
- Abstract summary: We show that online advertisements increase some people's belief in climate change while resulting in decreased belief in others.
In particular, we show that the effect of the advertisements could change depending on people's age and ethnicity.
- Score: 55.41644538483948
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Different advertising messages work for different people. Machine learning
can be an effective way to personalise climate communications. In this paper we
use machine learning to reanalyse findings from a recent study, showing that
online advertisements increased some people's belief in climate change while
resulting in decreased belief in others. In particular, we show that the effect
of the advertisements could change depending on people's age and ethnicity.
Related papers
- Promoting Reliable Knowledge about Climate Change: A Systematic Review of Effective Measures to Resist Manipulation on Social Media [11.476777375043381]
We find that commonly recommended approaches to addressing manipulation about climate change include corrective information sharing and education campaigns targeting media literacy.
We locate research gaps that include the lack of attention to large commercial and political entities involved in generating and disseminating manipulation.
Evidence drawn from many studies demonstrates an emerging consensus about policies required to promote reliable knowledge about climate change and resist manipulation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-31T10:58:38Z) - Modulating Language Model Experiences through Frictions [56.17593192325438]
Over-consumption of language model outputs risks propagating unchecked errors in the short-term and damaging human capabilities for critical thinking in the long-term.
We propose selective frictions for language model experiences, inspired by behavioral science interventions, to dampen misuse.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-24T16:31:11Z) - ClimateNLP: Analyzing Public Sentiment Towards Climate Change Using
Natural Language Processing [0.0]
This paper employs natural language processing (NLP) techniques to analyze climate change discourse and quantify the sentiment of climate change-related tweets.
The objective is to discern the sentiment individuals express and uncover patterns in public opinion concerning climate change.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-12T07:48:50Z) - Show me the numbers! -- Student-facing Interventions in Adaptive
Learning Environments for German Spelling [0.0]
Student-facing adaptive learning environments are effective in improving a persons error rate.
We evaluate the different interventions with regard to the error rate, the number of early dropouts, and the users competency.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-13T15:33:09Z) - Persuasion Strategies in Advertisements [68.70313043201882]
We introduce an extensive vocabulary of persuasion strategies and build the first ad image corpus annotated with persuasion strategies.
We then formulate the task of persuasion strategy prediction with multi-modal learning.
We conduct a real-world case study on 1600 advertising campaigns of 30 Fortune-500 companies.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-08-20T07:33:13Z) - Adherence to Misinformation on Social Media Through Socio-Cognitive and
Group-Based Processes [79.79659145328856]
We argue that when misinformation proliferates, this happens because the social media environment enables adherence to misinformation.
We make the case that polarization and misinformation adherence are closely tied.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-30T12:34:24Z) - Trend and Thoughts: Understanding Climate Change Concern using Machine
Learning and Social Media Data [3.7384509727711923]
We constructed a massive climate change Twitter dataset and conducted comprehensive analysis using machine learning.
By conducting topic modeling and natural language processing, we show the relationship between the number of tweets about climate change and major climate events.
Our dataset was published on Kaggle and can be used in further research.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-11-06T19:59:03Z) - Revealing Persona Biases in Dialogue Systems [64.96908171646808]
We present the first large-scale study on persona biases in dialogue systems.
We conduct analyses on personas of different social classes, sexual orientations, races, and genders.
In our studies of the Blender and DialoGPT dialogue systems, we show that the choice of personas can affect the degree of harms in generated responses.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-04-18T05:44:41Z) - The Human Effect Requires Affect: Addressing Social-Psychological
Factors of Climate Change with Machine Learning [2.0178765779788495]
We propose an investigation into how affect could be incorporated to enhance machine learning based interventions for climate change.
We propose using affective agent-based modelling for climate change as well as the use of a simulated climate change social dilemma.
We expect that utilizing affective ML can make interventions an even more powerful tool and help mitigative behaviours become widely adopted.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-11-24T23:34:54Z) - Cross-Domain Learning for Classifying Propaganda in Online Contents [67.10699378370752]
We present an approach to leverage cross-domain learning, based on labeled documents and sentences from news and tweets, as well as political speeches with a clear difference in their degrees of being propagandistic.
Our experiments demonstrate the usefulness of this approach, and identify difficulties and limitations in various configurations of sources and targets for the transfer step.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-11-13T10:19:13Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.