CAMul: Calibrated and Accurate Multi-view Time-Series Forecasting

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2109.07438v1
• Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2021 17:13:47 GMT
• Title: CAMul: Calibrated and Accurate Multi-view Time-Series Forecasting
• Authors: Harshavardhan Kamarthi, Lingkai Kong, Alexander Rodr\'iguez, Chao Zhang, B. Aditya Prakash
• Abstract summary: We propose a general probabilistic multi-view forecasting framework CAMul. It can learn representations and uncertainty from diverse data sources. It integrates the knowledge and uncertainty from each data view in a dynamic context-specific manner. We show that CAMul outperforms other state-of-art probabilistic forecasting models by over 25% in accuracy and calibration.
• Score: 70.54920804222031
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Probabilistic time-series forecasting enables reliable decision making across many domains. Most forecasting problems have diverse sources of data containing multiple modalities and structures. Leveraging information as well as uncertainty from these data sources for well-calibrated and accurate forecasts is an important challenging problem. Most previous work on multi-modal learning and forecasting simply aggregate intermediate representations from each data view by simple methods of summation or concatenation and do not explicitly model uncertainty for each data-view. We propose a general probabilistic multi-view forecasting framework CAMul, that can learn representations and uncertainty from diverse data sources. It integrates the knowledge and uncertainty from each data view in a dynamic context-specific manner assigning more importance to useful views to model a well-calibrated forecast distribution. We use CAMul for multiple domains with varied sources and modalities and show that CAMul outperforms other state-of-art probabilistic forecasting models by over 25\% in accuracy and calibration.

Related papers

• Rating Multi-Modal Time-Series Forecasting Models (MM-TSFM) for Robustness Through a Causal Lens [10.103561529332184]
  We focus on multi-modal time-series forecasting, where imprecision due to noisy or incorrect data can lead to erroneous predictions. We introduce a rating methodology to assess the robustness of Multi-Modal Time-Series Forecasting Models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-12T17:39:16Z)
• When Rigidity Hurts: Soft Consistency Regularization for Probabilistic Hierarchical Time Series Forecasting [69.30930115236228]
  Probabilistic hierarchical time-series forecasting is an important variant of time-series forecasting. Most methods focus on point predictions and do not provide well-calibrated probabilistic forecasts distributions. We propose PROFHiT, a fully probabilistic hierarchical forecasting model that jointly models forecast distribution of entire hierarchy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-17T20:30:16Z)
• When Rigidity Hurts: Soft Consistency Regularization for Probabilistic Hierarchical Time Series Forecasting [69.30930115236228]
  Probabilistic hierarchical time-series forecasting is an important variant of time-series forecasting. Most methods focus on point predictions and do not provide well-calibrated probabilistic forecasts distributions. We propose PROFHiT, a fully probabilistic hierarchical forecasting model that jointly models forecast distribution of entire hierarchy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-16T06:13:53Z)
• TACTiS: Transformer-Attentional Copulas for Time Series [76.71406465526454]
  estimation of time-varying quantities is a fundamental component of decision making in fields such as healthcare and finance. We propose a versatile method that estimates joint distributions using an attention-based decoder. We show that our model produces state-of-the-art predictions on several real-world datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-07T21:37:29Z)
• MECATS: Mixture-of-Experts for Quantile Forecasts of Aggregated Time Series [11.826510794042548]
  We introduce a mixture of heterogeneous experts framework called textttMECATS. It simultaneously forecasts the values of a set of time series that are related through an aggregation hierarchy. Different types of forecasting models can be employed as individual experts so that the form of each model can be tailored to the nature of the corresponding time series.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-22T05:05:30Z)
• A framework for probabilistic weather forecast post-processing across models and lead times using machine learning [3.1542695050861544]
  We show how to bridge the gap between sets of separate forecasts from NWP models and the 'ideal' forecast for decision support. We use Quantile Regression Forests to learn the error profile of each numerical model, and use these to apply empirically-derived probability distributions to forecasts. Second, we combine these probabilistic forecasts using quantile averaging. Third, we interpolate between the aggregate quantiles in order to generate a full predictive distribution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-06T16:46:02Z)
• Ambiguity in Sequential Data: Predicting Uncertain Futures with Recurrent Models [110.82452096672182]
  We propose an extension of the Multiple Hypothesis Prediction (MHP) model to handle ambiguous predictions with sequential data. We also introduce a novel metric for ambiguous problems, which is better suited to account for uncertainties.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-10T09:15:42Z)
• Diversity inducing Information Bottleneck in Model Ensembles [73.80615604822435]
  In this paper, we target the problem of generating effective ensembles of neural networks by encouraging diversity in prediction. We explicitly optimize a diversity inducing adversarial loss for learning latent variables and thereby obtain diversity in the output predictions necessary for modeling multi-modal data. Compared to the most competitive baselines, we show significant improvements in classification accuracy, under a shift in the data distribution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-10T03:10:41Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.