Reaching the bubble may not be enough: news media role in online
political polarization
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2109.08906v2
- Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2022 21:13:47 GMT
- Title: Reaching the bubble may not be enough: news media role in online
political polarization
- Authors: Jordan K Kobellarz, Milos Brocic, Alexandre R Graeml, Daniel Silver
and Thiago H Silva
- Abstract summary: A way of reducing polarization would be by distributing cross-partisan news among individuals with distinct political orientations.
This study investigates whether this holds in the context of nationwide elections in Brazil and Canada.
- Score: 58.720142291102135
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Politics in different countries show diverse degrees of polarization, which
tends to be stronger on social media, given how easy it became to connect and
engage with like-minded individuals on the web. A way of reducing polarization
would be by distributing cross-partisan news among individuals with distinct
political orientations, i.e., ``reaching the bubbles''. This study investigates
whether this holds in the context of nationwide elections in Brazil and Canada.
We collected politics-related tweets shared during the 2018 Brazilian
presidential election and the 2019 Canadian federal election. Next, we proposed
an updated centrality metric that enables identifying highly central bubble
reachers, nodes that can distribute content among users with diverging
political opinions - a fundamental metric for the proposed study. After that,
we analyzed how users engage with news content shared by bubble reachers, its
source, and its topics, considering its political orientation. Among other
results, we found that, even though news media disseminate content that
interests different sides of the political spectrum, users tend to engage
considerably more with content that aligns with their political orientation,
regardless of the topic.
Related papers
- Finding Hidden Swing Voters in the 2022 Italian Elections Twitter Discourse [1.3654846342364308]
We examine the dynamics of political messaging and voter behavior on Twitter during the 2022 Italian general elections.
Our analysis reveals that during election periods, the popularity of politicians increases, and there is a notable variation in the use of persuasive language techniques.
Swing voters are more vulnerable to these propaganda techniques compared to non-swing voters, with differences in vulnerability patterns across various types of political shifts.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-01T13:34:29Z) - Bubble reachers and uncivil discourse in polarized online public sphere [2.107064828705641]
We study how ideologically neutral bubble reachers differ from ideologically partisan accounts in the level of uncivil discourse they provoke.
Our results suggest that while ideologically neutral bubble reachers support less uncivil discourse in Canada, the opposite relationship holds in Brazil.
This indicates that bubble reaching and incivility are moderated by the national political context.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-19T23:59:04Z) - Understanding Divergent Framing of the Supreme Court Controversies:
Social Media vs. News Outlets [56.67097829383139]
We focus on the nuanced distinctions in framing of social media and traditional media outlets concerning a series of U.S. Supreme Court rulings.
We observe significant polarization in the news media's treatment of affirmative action and abortion rights, whereas the topic of student loans tends to exhibit a greater degree of consensus.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-18T06:40:21Z) - Bias or Diversity? Unraveling Fine-Grained Thematic Discrepancy in U.S.
News Headlines [63.52264764099532]
We use a large dataset of 1.8 million news headlines from major U.S. media outlets spanning from 2014 to 2022.
We quantify the fine-grained thematic discrepancy related to four prominent topics - domestic politics, economic issues, social issues, and foreign affairs.
Our findings indicate that on domestic politics and social issues, the discrepancy can be attributed to a certain degree of media bias.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-28T03:31:37Z) - Unveiling the Hidden Agenda: Biases in News Reporting and Consumption [59.55900146668931]
We build a six-year dataset on the Italian vaccine debate and adopt a Bayesian latent space model to identify narrative and selection biases.
We found a nonlinear relationship between biases and engagement, with higher engagement for extreme positions.
Analysis of news consumption on Twitter reveals common audiences among news outlets with similar ideological positions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-01-14T18:58:42Z) - Millions of Co-purchases and Reviews Reveal the Spread of Polarization
and Lifestyle Politics across Online Markets [68.8204255655161]
We study the pervasiveness of polarization and lifestyle politics over different product segments in a diverse market.
We sample 234.6 million relations among 21.8 million market entities to find product categories that are politically relevant, aligned, and polarized.
Cultural products are 4 times more polarized than any other segment.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-01-17T18:16:37Z) - Shifting Polarization and Twitter News Influencers between two U.S.
Presidential Elections [92.33485580547801]
We analyze the change of polarization between the 2016 and 2020 U.S. presidential elections.
Most of the top influencers were affiliated with media organizations during both elections.
75% of the top influencers in 2020 were not present in 2016, demonstrating that such status is difficult to retain.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-11-03T20:08:54Z) - Political Polarization in Online News Consumption [14.276551496332154]
Political polarization appears to be on the rise, as measured by voting behavior.
Research over the years has focused on the role of the Web as a driver of polarization.
We show that online news consumption follows a polarized pattern, where users' visits to news sources aligned with their own political leaning are substantially longer than their visits to other news sources.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-04-09T22:35:46Z) - Publishing patterns reflect political polarization in news media [1.5039745292757671]
We show how contributors' publishing trajectories tend to align with outlet political leanings.
We also show how contributors who cross partisan divides tend to focus on less explicitly political topics.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-01-13T13:26:18Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.