Online Aggregation of Probability Forecasts with Confidence
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2109.14309v1
- Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2021 09:49:16 GMT
- Title: Online Aggregation of Probability Forecasts with Confidence
- Authors: Vladimir V'yugin and Vladimir Trunov
- Abstract summary: The paper presents numerical experiments and some theoretical developments in prediction with expert advice (PEA)
We consider the case where several competing methods produce online predictions in the form of probability distribution functions.
We show that CRPS is a mixable loss function and then the time-independent upper bound for the regret of the Vovk aggregating algorithm using CRPS as a loss function can be obtained.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: The paper presents numerical experiments and some theoretical developments in
prediction with expert advice (PEA). One experiment deals with predicting
electricity consumption depending on temperature and uses real data. As the
pattern of dependence can change with season and time of the day, the domain
naturally admits PEA formulation with experts having different ``areas of
expertise''. We consider the case where several competing methods produce
online predictions in the form of probability distribution functions. The
dissimilarity between a probability forecast and an outcome is measured by a
loss function (scoring rule). A popular example of scoring rule for continuous
outcomes is Continuous Ranked Probability Score (CRPS). In this paper the
problem of combining probabilistic forecasts is considered in the PEA
framework. We show that CRPS is a mixable loss function and then the
time-independent upper bound for the regret of the Vovk aggregating algorithm
using CRPS as a loss function can be obtained. Also, we incorporate a
``smooth'' version of the method of specialized experts in this scheme which
allows us to combine the probabilistic predictions of the specialized experts
with overlapping domains of their competence.
Related papers
- Score Matching-based Pseudolikelihood Estimation of Neural Marked
Spatio-Temporal Point Process with Uncertainty Quantification [59.81904428056924]
We introduce SMASH: a Score MAtching estimator for learning markedPs with uncertainty quantification.
Specifically, our framework adopts a normalization-free objective by estimating the pseudolikelihood of markedPs through score-matching.
The superior performance of our proposed framework is demonstrated through extensive experiments in both event prediction and uncertainty quantification.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-25T02:37:51Z) - Performative Time-Series Forecasting [71.18553214204978]
We formalize performative time-series forecasting (PeTS) from a machine-learning perspective.
We propose a novel approach, Feature Performative-Shifting (FPS), which leverages the concept of delayed response to anticipate distribution shifts.
We conduct comprehensive experiments using multiple time-series models on COVID-19 and traffic forecasting tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-09T18:34:29Z) - Invariant Probabilistic Prediction [45.90606906307022]
We show that arbitrary distribution shifts do not, in general, admit invariant and robust probabilistic predictions.
We propose a method to yield invariant probabilistic predictions, called IPP, and study the consistency of the underlying parameters.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-18T18:50:24Z) - Regions of Reliability in the Evaluation of Multivariate Probabilistic
Forecasts [73.33395097728128]
We provide the first systematic finite-sample study of proper scoring rules for time-series forecasting evaluation.
We carry out our analysis on a comprehensive synthetic benchmark, specifically designed to test several key discrepancies between ground-truth and forecast distributions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-04-19T17:38:42Z) - Quantifying Uncertainty in Deep Spatiotemporal Forecasting [67.77102283276409]
We describe two types of forecasting problems: regular grid-based and graph-based.
We analyze UQ methods from both the Bayesian and the frequentist point view, casting in a unified framework via statistical decision theory.
Through extensive experiments on real-world road network traffic, epidemics, and air quality forecasting tasks, we reveal the statistical computational trade-offs for different UQ methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-05-25T14:35:46Z) - Learning Interpretable Deep State Space Model for Probabilistic Time
Series Forecasting [98.57851612518758]
Probabilistic time series forecasting involves estimating the distribution of future based on its history.
We propose a deep state space model for probabilistic time series forecasting whereby the non-linear emission model and transition model are parameterized by networks.
We show in experiments that our model produces accurate and sharp probabilistic forecasts.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-01-31T06:49:33Z) - Sequential Aggregation of Probabilistic Forecasts -- Applicaton to Wind
Speed Ensemble Forecasts [0.0]
This article adapts the theory of prediction with expert advice to the case of probabilistic forecasts issued as step-wise cumulative distribution functions (CDFs)
The second goal of this study is to explore the use of two forecast performance criteria: the Continous ranked probability score (CRPS) and the Jolliffe-Primo test.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-05-07T15:07:43Z) - Mixability of Integral Losses: a Key to Efficient Online Aggregation of Functional and Probabilistic Forecasts [72.32459441619388]
We adapt basic mixable (and exponentially concave) loss functions to compare functional predictions and prove that these adaptations are also mixable (exp-concave)
As an application of our main result, we prove that various loss functions used for probabilistic forecasting are mixable (exp-concave)
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2019-12-15T14:25:33Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.