Decision-Theoretic Question Generation for Situated Reference Resolution: An Empirical Study and Computational Model

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2110.06288v1
• Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2021 19:23:25 GMT
• Title: Decision-Theoretic Question Generation for Situated Reference Resolution: An Empirical Study and Computational Model
• Authors: Felix Gervits, Gordon Briggs, Antonio Roque, Genki A. Kadomatsu, Dean Thurston, Matthias Scheutz, Matthew Marge
• Abstract summary: We analyzed dialogue data from an interactive study in which participants controlled a virtual robot tasked with organizing a set of tools while engaging in dialogue with a live, remote experimenter. We discovered a number of novel results, including the distribution of question types used to resolve ambiguity and the influence of dialogue-level factors on the reference resolution process.
• Score: 11.543386846947554
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Dialogue agents that interact with humans in situated environments need to manage referential ambiguity across multiple modalities and ask for help as needed. However, it is not clear what kinds of questions such agents should ask nor how the answers to such questions can be used to resolve ambiguity. To address this, we analyzed dialogue data from an interactive study in which participants controlled a virtual robot tasked with organizing a set of tools while engaging in dialogue with a live, remote experimenter. We discovered a number of novel results, including the distribution of question types used to resolve ambiguity and the influence of dialogue-level factors on the reference resolution process. Based on these empirical findings we: (1) developed a computational model for clarification requests using a decision network with an entropy-based utility assignment method that operates across modalities, (2) evaluated the model, showing that it outperforms a slot-filling baseline in environments of varying ambiguity, and (3) interpreted the results to offer insight into the ways that agents can ask questions to facilitate situated reference resolution.

Related papers

• ADESSE: Advice Explanations in Complex Repeated Decision-Making Environments [14.105935964906976]
  This work considers a problem setup where an intelligent agent provides advice to a human decision-maker. We develop an approach named ADESSE to generate explanations about the adviser agent to improve human trust and decision-making.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-31T08:59:20Z)
• Clarify When Necessary: Resolving Ambiguity Through Interaction with LMs [58.620269228776294]
  We propose a task-agnostic framework for resolving ambiguity by asking users clarifying questions. We evaluate systems across three NLP applications: question answering, machine translation and natural language inference. We find that intent-sim is robust, demonstrating improvements across a wide range of NLP tasks and LMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-16T00:18:50Z)
• Explaining by Imitating: Understanding Decisions by Interpretable Policy Learning [72.80902932543474]
  Understanding human behavior from observed data is critical for transparency and accountability in decision-making. Consider real-world settings such as healthcare, in which modeling a decision-maker's policy is challenging. We propose a data-driven representation of decision-making behavior that inheres transparency by design, accommodates partial observability, and operates completely offline.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-28T13:06:14Z)
• Diverse and Faithful Knowledge-Grounded Dialogue Generation via Sequential Posterior Inference [82.28542500317445]
  We present an end-to-end learning framework, termed Sequential Posterior Inference (SPI), capable of selecting knowledge and generating dialogues. Unlike other methods, SPI does not require the inference network or assume a simple geometry of the posterior distribution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-01T21:23:13Z)
• Inverse Online Learning: Understanding Non-Stationary and Reactionary Policies [79.60322329952453]
  We show how to develop interpretable representations of how agents make decisions. By understanding the decision-making processes underlying a set of observed trajectories, we cast the policy inference problem as the inverse to this online learning problem. We introduce a practical algorithm for retrospectively estimating such perceived effects, alongside the process through which agents update them. Through application to the analysis of UNOS organ donation acceptance decisions, we demonstrate that our approach can bring valuable insights into the factors that govern decision processes and how they change over time.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-14T17:40:42Z)
• Deciding Whether to Ask Clarifying Questions in Large-Scale Spoken Language Understanding [28.195853603190447]
  A large-scale conversational agent can suffer from understanding user utterances with various ambiguities. We propose a neural self-attentive model that leverages the hypotheses with ambiguities and contextual signals.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-25T22:32:10Z)
• Combining Inductive and Deductive Reasoning for Query Answering over Incomplete Knowledge Graphs [12.852658691077643]
  Current methods for embedding-based query answering over incomplete Knowledge Graphs (KGs) only focus on inductive reasoning. We propose various integration strategies into prominent representatives of embedding models. The achieved improvements in the setting that requires both inductive and deductive reasoning are from 20% to 55% in HITS@3.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-26T16:05:44Z)
• Probing Task-Oriented Dialogue Representation from Language Models [106.02947285212132]
  This paper investigates pre-trained language models to find out which model intrinsically carries the most informative representation for task-oriented dialogue tasks. We fine-tune a feed-forward layer as the classifier probe on top of a fixed pre-trained language model with annotated labels in a supervised way.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-26T21:34:39Z)
• Learning an Effective Context-Response Matching Model with Self-Supervised Tasks for Retrieval-based Dialogues [88.73739515457116]
  We introduce four self-supervised tasks including next session prediction, utterance restoration, incoherence detection and consistency discrimination. We jointly train the PLM-based response selection model with these auxiliary tasks in a multi-task manner. Experiment results indicate that the proposed auxiliary self-supervised tasks bring significant improvement for multi-turn response selection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-14T08:44:46Z)
• Guided Transformer: Leveraging Multiple External Sources for Representation Learning in Conversational Search [36.64582291809485]
  Asking clarifying questions in response to ambiguous or faceted queries has been recognized as a useful technique for various information retrieval systems. In this paper, we enrich the representations learned by Transformer networks using a novel attention mechanism from external information sources. Our experiments use a public dataset for search clarification and demonstrate significant improvements compared to competitive baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-13T03:24:53Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.