Entanglement Measures and Monogamy

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2111.05109v1
• Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2021 14:54:00 GMT
• Title: Entanglement Measures and Monogamy
• Authors: Alexey Lopukhin
• Abstract summary: This dissertation will serve as an introduction to entanglement quantification. We will review the properties of entanglement that should be satisfied by a "good" entanglement measure. We will discuss the proposals of the mathematical representations of another property of entanglement, called monogamy.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: This dissertation will serve as an introduction to entanglement quantification, containing highly detailed proofs ensuring solid understanding of the subject. Specifically, we will review the properties of entanglement that should be satisfied by a "good" entanglement measure. Then we will have a look at some of the propositions of the entanglement measures that have been made over the years. We will review in greater detail the entanglement of formation. We will discuss the proposals of the mathematical representations of another property of entanglement, called monogamy. We will introduce some definitions of monogamous entanglement measures that were proposed and compare them. As an original observation of mine (page 28), I will also show that "Should Entanglement Measures be Monogamous or Faithful?" (arXiv:1604.02189) has already developed most of what is necessary to prove that the entanglement of formation and the regularised entropy of entanglement are monogamous entanglement measures in the sense of the definition that was given in "Monogamy of entanglement without inequalities" (arXiv:1710.03295).

Related papers

• Understanding Probe Behaviors through Variational Bounds of Mutual Information [53.520525292756005]
  We provide guidelines for linear probing by constructing a novel mathematical framework leveraging information theory. First, we connect probing with the variational bounds of mutual information (MI) to relax the probe design, equating linear probing with fine-tuning. We show that the intermediate representations can have the biggest MI estimate because of the tradeoff between better separability and decreasing MI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-15T18:38:18Z)
• The distinctive symmetry of Bell states [65.268245109828]
  The Bell's basis is composed of four maximally entangled states of two qubits. The aim of this paper is to find out the symmetries that determine a Bell state.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-14T17:02:41Z)
• Measurement incompatibility is strictly stronger than disturbance [44.99833362998488]
  Heisenberg argued that measurements irreversibly alter the state of the system on which they are acting, causing an irreducible disturbance on subsequent measurements. This article shows that measurement incompatibility is indeed a sufficient condition for irreversibility of measurement disturbance. However, we exhibit a toy theory, termed the minimal classical theory (MCT), that is a counterexample for the converse implication.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-26T13:47:00Z)
• General Monogamy and polygamy properties of quantum systems [7.611807718534491]
  We study general monogamy and polygamy relations based on the $alpha$th $(0leqalphaleq gamma)$ power of entanglement measures. We illustrate that these monogamy and polygamy relations are tighter than the inequalities in the article [Quantum Inf Process 19, 101]. For specific entanglement measures such as concurrence and the convex-roof extended negativity, by applying these relations, one can yield the corresponding monogamous and polygamous inequalities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-27T09:09:32Z)
• Should monogamy of entanglement be defined via equalities or inequalities? [0.0]
  This work focuses on the entanglement quantification. Specifically, we will go over the properties of entanglement that should be satisfied by a "good" entanglement measure. We will have a look at some of the propositions of the entanglement measures that have been made over the years. Then we will be ready to discuss the proposals of the mathematical representations of another property of entanglement, called monogamy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-13T18:22:12Z)
• A new parameterized monogamy relation between entanglement and equality [0.0]
  A monogamy equality rather than the usual inequality is presented based on the monogamy weight. We show that monogamy relations can be recovered by considering multiple copies of states for every non-additive entanglement measure.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-30T19:27:59Z)
• Monogamy of quantum entanglement [2.7631289602843774]
  monogamy of entanglement is restricted shareability of entanglement among multi-party systems. We introduce some generalized version of monogamy inequalities which extend and sharpen the traditional ones. We present two new definitions to define monogamy of entanglement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-02T15:03:56Z)
• Decomposed Mutual Information Estimation for Contrastive Representation Learning [66.52795579973484]
  Recent contrastive representation learning methods rely on estimating mutual information (MI) between multiple views of an underlying context. We propose decomposing the full MI estimation problem into a sum of smaller estimation problems by splitting one of the views into progressively more informed subviews. This expression contains a sum of unconditional and conditional MI terms, each measuring modest chunks of the total MI. We show that DEMI can capture a larger amount of MI than standard non-decomposed contrastive bounds in a synthetic setting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-25T03:19:25Z)
• Unified monogamy relation of entanglement measures [4.33804182451266]
  Various monogamy relations exist for different entanglement measures that are important in quantum information processing. We propose a general monogamy inequality for all entanglement measures on entangled qubit systems. These results are useful for exploring the entanglement theory, quantum information processing and secure quantum communication.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-09T02:51:27Z)
• Aligning Faithful Interpretations with their Social Attribution [58.13152510843004]
  We find that the requirement of model interpretations to be faithful is vague and incomplete. We identify that the problem is a misalignment between the causal chain of decisions (causal attribution) and the attribution of human behavior to the interpretation (social attribution)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-01T16:45:38Z)
• Towards Faithfully Interpretable NLP Systems: How should we define and evaluate faithfulness? [58.13152510843004]
  With the growing popularity of deep-learning based NLP models, comes a need for interpretable systems. What is interpretability, and what constitutes a high-quality interpretation? We call for more clearly differentiating between different desired criteria an interpretation should satisfy, and focus on the faithfulness criteria.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-07T20:15:28Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.