An Experimental Study of the Impact of Pre-training on the Pruning of a Convolutional Neural Network

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2112.08227v1
• Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2021 16:02:15 GMT
• Title: An Experimental Study of the Impact of Pre-training on the Pruning of a Convolutional Neural Network
• Authors: Nathan Hubens, Matei Mancas, Bernard Gosselin, Marius Preda, Titus Zaharia
• Abstract summary: In recent years, deep neural networks have known a wide success in various application domains. Deep neural networks usually involve a large number of parameters, which correspond to the weights of the network. The pruning methods notably attempt to reduce the size of the parameter set, by identifying and removing the irrelevant weights.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: In recent years, deep neural networks have known a wide success in various application domains. However, they require important computational and memory resources, which severely hinders their deployment, notably on mobile devices or for real-time applications. Neural networks usually involve a large number of parameters, which correspond to the weights of the network. Such parameters, obtained with the help of a training process, are determinant for the performance of the network. However, they are also highly redundant. The pruning methods notably attempt to reduce the size of the parameter set, by identifying and removing the irrelevant weights. In this paper, we examine the impact of the training strategy on the pruning efficiency. Two training modalities are considered and compared: (1) fine-tuned and (2) from scratch. The experimental results obtained on four datasets (CIFAR10, CIFAR100, SVHN and Caltech101) and for two different CNNs (VGG16 and MobileNet) demonstrate that a network that has been pre-trained on a large corpus (e.g. ImageNet) and then fine-tuned on a particular dataset can be pruned much more efficiently (up to 80% of parameter reduction) than the same network trained from scratch.

Related papers

• Just How Flexible are Neural Networks in Practice? [89.80474583606242]
  It is widely believed that a neural network can fit a training set containing at least as many samples as it has parameters. In practice, however, we only find solutions via our training procedure, including the gradient and regularizers, limiting flexibility.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-17T12:24:45Z)
• Improved Generalization of Weight Space Networks via Augmentations [53.87011906358727]
  Learning in deep weight spaces (DWS) is an emerging research direction, with applications to 2D and 3D neural fields (INRs, NeRFs) We empirically analyze the reasons for this overfitting and find that a key reason is the lack of diversity in DWS datasets. To address this, we explore strategies for data augmentation in weight spaces and propose a MixUp method adapted for weight spaces.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-06T15:34:44Z)
• Solving Large-scale Spatial Problems with Convolutional Neural Networks [88.31876586547848]
  We employ transfer learning to improve training efficiency for large-scale spatial problems. We propose that a convolutional neural network (CNN) can be trained on small windows of signals, but evaluated on arbitrarily large signals with little to no performance degradation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-14T01:24:42Z)
• WeightMom: Learning Sparse Networks using Iterative Momentum-based pruning [0.0]
  We propose a weight based pruning approach in which the weights are pruned gradually based on their momentum of the previous iterations. We evaluate our approach on networks such as AlexNet, VGG16 and ResNet50 with image classification datasets such as CIFAR-10 and CIFAR-100.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-11T07:13:59Z)
• Neural Network Pruning Through Constrained Reinforcement Learning [3.2880869992413246]
  We propose a general methodology for pruning neural networks. Our proposed methodology can prune neural networks to respect pre-defined computational budgets. We prove the effectiveness of our approach via comparison with state-of-the-art methods on standard image classification datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-16T11:57:38Z)
• Compact representations of convolutional neural networks via weight pruning and quantization [63.417651529192014]
  We propose a novel storage format for convolutional neural networks (CNNs) based on source coding and leveraging both weight pruning and quantization. We achieve a reduction of space occupancy up to 0.6% on fully connected layers and 5.44% on the whole network, while performing at least as competitive as the baseline.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-28T20:39:54Z)
• Learning Neural Network Subspaces [74.44457651546728]
  Recent observations have advanced our understanding of the neural network optimization landscape. With a similar computational cost as training one model, we learn lines, curves, and simplexes of high-accuracy neural networks. With a similar computational cost as training one model, we learn lines, curves, and simplexes of high-accuracy neural networks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-20T23:26:58Z)
• HALO: Learning to Prune Neural Networks with Shrinkage [5.283963846188862]
  Deep neural networks achieve state-of-the-art performance in a variety of tasks by extracting a rich set of features from unstructured data. Modern techniques for inducing sparsity and reducing model size are (1) network pruning, (2) training with a sparsity inducing penalty, and (3) training a binary mask jointly with the weights of the network. We present a novel penalty called Hierarchical Adaptive Lasso which learns to adaptively sparsify weights of a given network via trainable parameters.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-24T04:08:48Z)
• Using UNet and PSPNet to explore the reusability principle of CNN parameters [5.623232537411766]
  Reusability of parameters in each layer of a deep convolutional neural network is experimentally quantified. Running mean and running variance plays an important role than Weight and Bias in BN layer. The bias in Convolution layers are not sensitive, and it can be reused directly.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-08T01:51:08Z)
• Adjoined Networks: A Training Paradigm with Applications to Network Compression [3.995047443480282]
  We introduce Adjoined Networks, or AN, a learning paradigm that trains both the original base network and the smaller compressed network together. Using ResNet-50 as the base network, AN achieves 71.8% top-1 accuracy with only 1.8M parameters and 1.6 GFLOPs on the ImageNet data-set. We propose Differentiable Adjoined Networks (DAN), a training paradigm that augments AN by using neural architecture search to jointly learn both the width and the weights for each layer of the smaller network.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-10T02:48:16Z)
• Large-Scale Gradient-Free Deep Learning with Recursive Local Representation Alignment [84.57874289554839]
  Training deep neural networks on large-scale datasets requires significant hardware resources. Backpropagation, the workhorse for training these networks, is an inherently sequential process that is difficult to parallelize. We propose a neuro-biologically-plausible alternative to backprop that can be used to train deep networks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-10T16:20:02Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.