AcME -- Accelerated Model-agnostic Explanations: Fast Whitening of the Machine-Learning Black Box

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2112.12635v1
• Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2021 15:18:13 GMT
• Title: AcME -- Accelerated Model-agnostic Explanations: Fast Whitening of the Machine-Learning Black Box
• Authors: David Dandolo, Chiara Masiero, Mattia Carletti, Davide Dalle Pezze, Gian Antonio Susto
• Abstract summary: interpretability approaches should provide actionable insights without making the users wait. We propose Accelerated Model-agnostic Explanations (AcME), an interpretability approach that quickly provides feature importance scores both at the global and the local level. AcME computes feature ranking, but it also provides a what-if analysis tool to assess how changes in features values would affect model predictions.
• Score: 1.7534486934148554
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: In the context of human-in-the-loop Machine Learning applications, like Decision Support Systems, interpretability approaches should provide actionable insights without making the users wait. In this paper, we propose Accelerated Model-agnostic Explanations (AcME), an interpretability approach that quickly provides feature importance scores both at the global and the local level. AcME can be applied a posteriori to each regression or classification model. Not only does AcME compute feature ranking, but it also provides a what-if analysis tool to assess how changes in features values would affect model predictions. We evaluated the proposed approach on synthetic and real-world datasets, also in comparison with SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP), the approach we drew inspiration from, which is currently one of the state-of-the-art model-agnostic interpretability approaches. We achieved comparable results in terms of quality of produced explanations while reducing dramatically the computational time and providing consistent visualization for global and local interpretations. To foster research in this field, and for the sake of reproducibility, we also provide a repository with the code used for the experiments.

Related papers

• Interpretable Prognostics with Concept Bottleneck Models [5.939858158928473]
  Concept Bottleneck Models (CBMs) are inherently interpretable neural network architectures based on concept explanations. CBMs enable domain experts to intervene on the concept activations at test-time. Our case studies demonstrate that the performance of CBMs can be on par or superior to black-box models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-27T18:15:40Z)
• QualEval: Qualitative Evaluation for Model Improvement [82.73561470966658]
  We propose QualEval, which augments quantitative scalar metrics with automated qualitative evaluation as a vehicle for model improvement. QualEval uses a powerful LLM reasoner and our novel flexible linear programming solver to generate human-readable insights. We demonstrate that leveraging its insights, for example, improves the absolute performance of the Llama 2 model by up to 15% points relative.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-06T00:21:44Z)
• LaPLACE: Probabilistic Local Model-Agnostic Causal Explanations [1.0370398945228227]
  We introduce LaPLACE-explainer, designed to provide probabilistic cause-and-effect explanations for machine learning models. The LaPLACE-Explainer component leverages the concept of a Markov blanket to establish statistical boundaries between relevant and non-relevant features. Our approach offers causal explanations and outperforms LIME and SHAP in terms of local accuracy and consistency of explained features.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-01T04:09:59Z)
• Evaluating and Explaining Large Language Models for Code Using Syntactic Structures [74.93762031957883]
  This paper introduces ASTxplainer, an explainability method specific to Large Language Models for code. At its core, ASTxplainer provides an automated method for aligning token predictions with AST nodes. We perform an empirical evaluation on 12 popular LLMs for code using a curated dataset of the most popular GitHub projects.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-07T18:50:57Z)
• Consensus-Adaptive RANSAC [104.87576373187426]
  We propose a new RANSAC framework that learns to explore the parameter space by considering the residuals seen so far via a novel attention layer. The attention mechanism operates on a batch of point-to-model residuals, and updates a per-point estimation state to take into account the consensus found through a lightweight one-step transformer.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-26T08:25:46Z)
• Adaptive Local-Component-aware Graph Convolutional Network for One-shot Skeleton-based Action Recognition [54.23513799338309]
  We present an Adaptive Local-Component-aware Graph Convolutional Network for skeleton-based action recognition. Our method provides a stronger representation than the global embedding and helps our model reach state-of-the-art.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-21T02:33:07Z)
• MACE: An Efficient Model-Agnostic Framework for Counterfactual Explanation [132.77005365032468]
  We propose a novel framework of Model-Agnostic Counterfactual Explanation (MACE) In our MACE approach, we propose a novel RL-based method for finding good counterfactual examples and a gradient-less descent method for improving proximity. Experiments on public datasets validate the effectiveness with better validity, sparsity and proximity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-31T04:57:06Z)
• Layer-wise Analysis of a Self-supervised Speech Representation Model [26.727775920272205]
  Self-supervised learning approaches have been successful for pre-training speech representation models. Not much has been studied about the type or extent of information encoded in the pre-trained representations themselves.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-10T02:13:25Z)
• Interpretable Multi-dataset Evaluation for Named Entity Recognition [110.64368106131062]
  We present a general methodology for interpretable evaluation for the named entity recognition (NER) task. The proposed evaluation method enables us to interpret the differences in models and datasets, as well as the interplay between them. By making our analysis tool available, we make it easy for future researchers to run similar analyses and drive progress in this area.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-13T10:53:27Z)
• Adversarial Infidelity Learning for Model Interpretation [43.37354056251584]
  We propose a Model-agnostic Effective Efficient Direct (MEED) IFS framework for model interpretation. Our framework mitigates concerns about sanity, shortcuts, model identifiability, and information transmission. Our AIL mechanism can help learn the desired conditional distribution between selected features and targets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-09T16:27:17Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.