Related papers: Revisiting Quantum Contextuality

Revisiting Quantum Contextuality

URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2201.00371v1
Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2022 16:00:23 GMT
Title: Revisiting Quantum Contextuality
Authors: Philippe Grangier
Abstract summary: We will introduce and discuss the ideas of extracontextuality and extravalence. The link between these issues is provided by a specific quantum feature that we call extravalence.
Score: 0.0
License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
Abstract: The purpose of this note is to complete the interesting review on quantum contextuality [1] that appeared recently. In particular we will introduce and discuss the ideas of extracontextuality and extravalence, that allow one to relate Kochen-Specker's and Gleason's theorems, and also to shift the emphasis from the first to the second one. We will also argue that whereas Kochen-Specker's is essentially a negative result (a no-go theorem), Gleason's is a positive one since it provides a mathematical justification of Born's rule. The link between these issues is provided by a specific quantum feature that we call extravalence.

Related papers

Some mathematical issues regarding a new approach towards quantum foundation [0.0]
The weakest possible theorem giving a foundation behind the Hilbert space formalism of quantum theory is stated. The necessary postulates are formulated, and the mathematics is spelled out in details.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-20T08:14:14Z)
A computational test of quantum contextuality, and even simpler proofs of quantumness [43.25018099464869]
We show that an arbitrary contextuality game can be compiled into an operational "test of contextuality" involving a single quantum device. Our work can be seen as using cryptography to enforce spatial separation within subsystems of a single quantum device.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-10T19:30:23Z)
Relaxation of first-class constraints and the quantization of gauge theories: from "matter without matter" to the reappearance of time in quantum gravity [72.27323884094953]
We make a conceptual overview of an approach to the initial-value problem in canonical gauge theories. We stress how the first-class phase-space constraints may be relaxed if we interpret them as fixing the values of new degrees of freedom.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-19T19:00:02Z)
Two Results in the Quantum Theory of Measurements [44.99833362998488]
The first one clarifies and amends von Neumann's Measurement Postulate used in the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics. The second one clarifies the relationship between events'' and measurements'' and the meaning of measurements in the $ETH$-Approach to quantum mechanics.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-01T14:05:04Z)
Revisiting Quantum Contextuality in an Algebraic Framework [0.0]
We discuss the ideas of extracontextuality and extravalence, that allow one to relate Kochen-Specker's and Gleason's theorems. Our extracontextual approach requires however a way to describe the Heisenberg cut''
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-04-16T12:06:44Z)
On a gap in the proof of the generalised quantum Stein's lemma and its consequences for the reversibility of quantum resources [51.243733928201024]
We show that the proof of the generalised quantum Stein's lemma is not correct due to a gap in the argument leading to Lemma III.9. This puts into question a number of established results in the literature, in particular the reversibility of quantum entanglement.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-05-05T17:46:05Z)
Quantum indistinguishability through exchangeable desirable gambles [69.62715388742298]
Two particles are identical if all their intrinsic properties, such as spin and charge, are the same. Quantum mechanics is seen as a normative and algorithmic theory guiding an agent to assess her subjective beliefs represented as (coherent) sets of gambles. We show how sets of exchangeable observables (gambles) may be updated after a measurement and discuss the issue of defining entanglement for indistinguishable particle systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-05-10T13:11:59Z)
On the assumptions underlying KS-like contradictions [0.0]
The Kochen-Specker theorem is one of the fundamental no-go theorems in quantum theory. We examine the hypotheses that, at the ontological level, lead to the KochenSpecker contradiction.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-03-11T17:56:05Z)
On L\'{e}on van Hove's 1952 article on the foundations of Quantum Field Theory [0.0]
In 1952, L'eon van Hove published an article, in French, with the title Les difficult'es de divergences pour um modele particulier de champ quantifi'e''
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-05T17:59:06Z)
A Quantum G\"odelian Hunch [0.0]
This essay aims at arguing for such G"odelian hunch via two case studies. The theological motivational origin of quantum contextuality is introduced in order to show how this result might be related to a Liar-like undecidability. A personal analysis of the related Wigner's friend thought experiment and and a recent paradox by Frauchiger and Renner is presented.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-05-07T11:22:20Z)
Quantum-like modeling of the order effect in decision making: POVM viewpoint on the Wang-Busemeyer QQ-equality [77.34726150561087]
Wang and Busemeyer invented a quantum model and approach as well as non-parametric equality (so-called QQ-equality) This note is to test the possibility to expand the Wang-Busemeyer model by considering questions which are mathematically represented by positive operator valued measures. But, we also showed that, in principle, it is possible to reduce expanded model to the original Wang-Busemeyer model by expanding the context of the questions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2018-10-31T18:11:37Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.