Writing about COVID-19 vaccines: Emotional profiling unravels how mainstream and alternative press framed AstraZeneca, Pfizer and vaccination campaigns

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2201.07538v1
• Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2022 11:31:47 GMT
• Title: Writing about COVID-19 vaccines: Emotional profiling unravels how mainstream and alternative press framed AstraZeneca, Pfizer and vaccination campaigns
• Authors: Alfonso Semeraro, Salvatore Vilella, Giancarlo Ruffo and Massimo Stella
• Abstract summary: We use cognitive network science and natural language processing to reconstruct time-evolving semantic and emotional frames of 5745 Italian news. We found consistently high levels of trust/anticipation and less disgust in the way mainstream sources framed the general idea of "vaccine/vaccino" Our findings expose crucial aspects of the emotional narratives around COVID-19 vaccines adopted by the press.
• Score: 0.2064612766965483
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Since their announcement in November 2020, COVID-19 vaccines were largely debated by the press and social media. With most studies focusing on COVID-19 disinformation in social media, little attention has been paid to how mainstream news outlets framed COVID-19 narratives compared to alternative sources. To fill this gap, we use cognitive network science and natural language processing to reconstruct time-evolving semantic and emotional frames of 5745 Italian news, that were massively re-shared on Facebook and Twitter, about COVID-19 vaccines. We found consistently high levels of trust/anticipation and less disgust in the way mainstream sources framed the general idea of "vaccine/vaccino". These emotions were crucially missing in the ways alternative sources framed COVID-19 vaccines. More differences were found within specific instances of vaccines. Alternative news included titles framing the AstraZeneca vaccine with strong levels of sadness, absent in mainstream titles. Mainstream news initially framed "Pfizer" along more negative associations with side effects than "AstraZeneca". With the temporary suspension of the latter, on March 15th 2021, we identified a semantic/emotional shift: Even mainstream article titles framed "AstraZeneca" as semantically richer in negative associations with side effects, while "Pfizer" underwent a positive shift in valence, mostly related to its higher efficacy. "Thrombosis" entered the frame of vaccines together with fearful conceptual associations, while "death" underwent an emotional shift, steering towards fear in alternative titles and losing its hopeful connotation in mainstream titles. Our findings expose crucial aspects of the emotional narratives around COVID-19 vaccines adopted by the press, highlighting the need to understand how alternative and mainstream media report vaccination news.

Related papers

• Doctors vs. Nurses: Understanding the Great Divide in Vaccine Hesitancy among Healthcare Workers [64.1526243118151]
  We find that doctors are overall more positive toward the COVID-19 vaccines. Doctors are more concerned with the effectiveness of the vaccines over newer variants. Nurses pay more attention to the potential side effects on children.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-11T14:22:16Z)
• Vaccine Discourse on Twitter During the COVID-19 Pandemic [0.7161783472741748]
  This study investigates posts related to COVID-19 vaccines on Twitter and focuses on those which have a negative stance toward vaccines. A dataset of 16,713,238 English tweets related to COVID-19 vaccines was collected. We show that the negativity with respect to COVID-19 vaccines has decreased over time along with the vaccine roll-outs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-23T13:50:51Z)
• "COVID-19 was a FIFA conspiracy #curropt": An Investigation into the Viral Spread of COVID-19 Misinformation [60.268682953952506]
  We estimate the extent to which misinformation has influenced the course of the COVID-19 pandemic using natural language processing models. We provide a strategy to combat social media posts that are likely to cause widespread harm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-12T19:41:01Z)
• Cross-lingual COVID-19 Fake News Detection [54.125563009333995]
  We make the first attempt to detect COVID-19 misinformation in a low-resource language (Chinese) only using the fact-checked news in a high-resource language (English) We propose a deep learning framework named CrossFake to jointly encode the cross-lingual news body texts and capture the news content. Empirical results on our dataset demonstrate the effectiveness of CrossFake under the cross-lingual setting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-13T04:44:02Z)
• Sentiment Analysis and Topic Modeling for COVID-19 Vaccine Discussions [10.194753795363667]
  We conduct an in-depth analysis of tweets related to the coronavirus vaccine on Twitter. Results show that a majority of people are confident in the effectiveness of vaccines and are willing to get vaccinated. Negative tweets are often associated with the complaints of vaccine shortages, side effects after injections and possible death after being vaccinated.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-08T23:30:17Z)
• Insight from NLP Analysis: COVID-19 Vaccines Sentiments on Social Media [6.965634726663563]
  We collected tweet posts by the UK and US residents from the Twitter API during the pandemic. We performed sentiment analysis by VADER and proposed a new method that can count the individual's influence. The results indicated that celebrities could lead the opinion shift on social media in vaccination progress.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-08T03:37:22Z)
• Mining Trends of COVID-19 Vaccine Beliefs on Twitter with Lexical Embeddings [0.8808021343665321]
  We extracted a corpus of Twitter posts related to COVID-19 vaccination. We created two classes of lexical categories - Emotions and Influencing factors. Negative emotions like hesitancy towards vaccines have a high correlation with health-related effects and misinformation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-02T16:13:16Z)
• Cognitive networks identify the content of English and Italian popular posts about COVID-19 vaccines: Anticipation, logistics, conspiracy and loss of trust [0.5801044612920815]
  We focus on 4765 unique popular tweets in English or Italian about COVID-19 vaccines. One popular English tweet was liked up to 495,000 times. English semantic frame of "vaccine" was highly polarised between trust/anticipation and anger/sadness. Italian tweets framed "vaccine" by crucially replacing earlier levels of trust with deep sadness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-29T19:38:13Z)
• The illicit trade of COVID-19 vaccines on the dark web [55.45786602961871]
  Early analyses revealed that dark web marketplaces (DWMs) started offering COVID-19 related products (e.g., masks and COVID-19 tests) as soon as the COVID-19 pandemic started. Here, we broaden the scope and depth of previous investigations by analysing 194 DWMs until July 2021, including the crucial period in which vaccines became available. We show that recreational drugs are the most affected among traditional DWMs product, with COVID-19 mentions steadily increasing since March 2020.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-10T14:52:54Z)
• Dark Web Marketplaces and COVID-19: before the vaccine [53.447910186085586]
  We analyse 851,199 listings extracted from 30 dark web marketplaces between January 1, 2020 and November 16, 2020. We identify 788 listings directly related to COVID-19 products and monitor the temporal evolution of product categories. We reveal how the online shadow economy has evolved during the COVID-19 pandemic and highlight the importance of a continuous monitoring of DWMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-04T14:27:41Z)
• Falling into the Echo Chamber: the Italian Vaccination Debate on Twitter [65.7192861893042]
  We examine the extent to which the vaccination debate on Twitter is conductive to potential outreach to the vaccination hesitant. We discover that the vaccination skeptics, as well as the advocates, reside in their own distinct "echo chambers" At the center of these echo chambers we find the ardent supporters, for which we build highly accurate network- and content-based classifiers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-26T13:55:50Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.