Predictive modeling of movements of refugees and internally displaced
people: Towards a computational framework
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2201.08006v1
- Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2022 05:33:12 GMT
- Title: Predictive modeling of movements of refugees and internally displaced
people: Towards a computational framework
- Authors: Katherine Hoffmann Pham and Miguel Luengo-Oroz
- Abstract summary: There is a growing interest in using machine learning to better anticipate future arrivals.
There is little standardized knowledge on how to predict refugee and IDP flows in practice.
We provide a systematic model-agnostic framework, adapted to the use of big data sources, for structuring the prediction problem.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Predicting forced displacement is an important undertaking of many
humanitarian aid agencies, which must anticipate flows in advance in order to
provide vulnerable refugees and Internally Displaced Persons (IDPs) with
shelter, food, and medical care. While there is a growing interest in using
machine learning to better anticipate future arrivals, there is little
standardized knowledge on how to predict refugee and IDP flows in practice.
Researchers and humanitarian officers are confronted with the need to make
decisions about how to structure their datasets and how to fit their problem to
predictive analytics approaches, and they must choose from a variety of
modeling options. Most of the time, these decisions are made without an
understanding of the full range of options that could be considered, and using
methodologies that have primarily been applied in different contexts - and with
different goals - as opportunistic references. In this work, we attempt to
facilitate a more comprehensive understanding of this emerging field of
research by providing a systematic model-agnostic framework, adapted to the use
of big data sources, for structuring the prediction problem. As we do so, we
highlight existing work on predicting refugee and IDP flows. We also draw on
our own experience building models to predict forced displacement in Somalia,
in order to illustrate the choices facing modelers and point to open research
questions that may be used to guide future work.
Related papers
- Approaching Human-Level Forecasting with Language Models [34.202996056121]
We study whether language models (LMs) can forecast at the level of competitive human forecasters.
We develop a retrieval-augmented LM system designed to automatically search for relevant information, generate forecasts, and aggregate predictions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-28T18:54:18Z) - JRDB-Traj: A Dataset and Benchmark for Trajectory Forecasting in Crowds [79.00975648564483]
Trajectory forecasting models, employed in fields such as robotics, autonomous vehicles, and navigation, face challenges in real-world scenarios.
This dataset provides comprehensive data, including the locations of all agents, scene images, and point clouds, all from the robot's perspective.
The objective is to predict the future positions of agents relative to the robot using raw sensory input data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-05T18:59:31Z) - Modeling Population Movements under Uncertainty at the Border in
Humanitarian Crises: A Situational Analysis Tool [6.156378985704528]
We present a situational analysis tool to help anticipate the number of migrants and forcibly displaced persons that will cross a border in a humanitarian crisis.
The tool consists of: (i) indicators of potential intent to move drawn from traditional and big data sources; (ii) predictive models for forecasting possible future movements; and (iii) a simulation of border crossings and shelter capacity requirements under different conditions.
This tool has been specifically adapted to contingency planning in settings of high uncertainty, with an application to the Brazil-Venezuela border during the COVID-19 pandemic.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-27T21:48:38Z) - Data-Centric Epidemic Forecasting: A Survey [56.99209141838794]
This survey delves into various data-driven methodological and practical advancements.
We enumerate the large number of epidemiological datasets and novel data streams that are relevant to epidemic forecasting.
We also discuss experiences and challenges that arise in real-world deployment of these forecasting systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-07-19T16:15:11Z) - What Should I Know? Using Meta-gradient Descent for Predictive Feature
Discovery in a Single Stream of Experience [63.75363908696257]
computational reinforcement learning seeks to construct an agent's perception of the world through predictions of future sensations.
An open challenge in this line of work is determining from the infinitely many predictions that the agent could possibly make which predictions might best support decision-making.
We introduce a meta-gradient descent process by which an agent learns what predictions to make, 2) the estimates for its chosen predictions, and 3) how to use those estimates to generate policies that maximize future reward.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-13T21:31:06Z) - A Human-Centric Take on Model Monitoring [23.006624840045554]
We identify various human-centric challenges and requirements for model monitoring in real-world applications.
We find the need and the challenge for the model monitoring systems to clarify the impact of the monitoring observations on outcomes.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-06T19:47:29Z) - Test-time Collective Prediction [73.74982509510961]
Multiple parties in machine learning want to jointly make predictions on future test points.
Agents wish to benefit from the collective expertise of the full set of agents, but may not be willing to release their data or model parameters.
We explore a decentralized mechanism to make collective predictions at test time, leveraging each agent's pre-trained model.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-22T18:29:58Z) - When Does Uncertainty Matter?: Understanding the Impact of Predictive
Uncertainty in ML Assisted Decision Making [68.19284302320146]
We carry out user studies to assess how people with differing levels of expertise respond to different types of predictive uncertainty.
We found that showing posterior predictive distributions led to smaller disagreements with the ML model's predictions.
This suggests that posterior predictive distributions can potentially serve as useful decision aids which should be used with caution and take into account the type of distribution and the expertise of the human.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-11-12T02:23:53Z) - Forethought and Hindsight in Credit Assignment [62.05690959741223]
We work to understand the gains and peculiarities of planning employed as forethought via forward models or as hindsight operating with backward models.
We investigate the best use of models in planning, primarily focusing on the selection of states in which predictions should be (re)-evaluated.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-26T16:00:47Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.