Monitoring Model Deterioration with Explainable Uncertainty Estimation via Non-parametric Bootstrap

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2201.11676v1
• Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2022 17:23:04 GMT
• Title: Monitoring Model Deterioration with Explainable Uncertainty Estimation via Non-parametric Bootstrap
• Authors: Carlos Mougan, Dan Saattrup Nielsen
• Abstract summary: Monitoring machine learning models once they are deployed is challenging. It is even more challenging to decide when to retrain models in real-case scenarios when labeled data is beyond reach. In this work, we use non-parametric bootstrapped uncertainty estimates and SHAP values to provide explainable uncertainty estimation.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Monitoring machine learning models once they are deployed is challenging. It is even more challenging to decide when to retrain models in real-case scenarios when labeled data is beyond reach, and monitoring performance metrics becomes unfeasible. In this work, we use non-parametric bootstrapped uncertainty estimates and SHAP values to provide explainable uncertainty estimation as a technique that aims to monitor the deterioration of machine learning models in deployment environments, as well as determine the source of model deterioration when target labels are not available. Classical methods are purely aimed at detecting distribution shift, which can lead to false positives in the sense that the model has not deteriorated despite a shift in the data distribution. To estimate model uncertainty we construct prediction intervals using a novel bootstrap method, which improves upon the work of Kumar & Srivastava (2012). We show that both our model deterioration detection system as well as our uncertainty estimation method achieve better performance than the current state-of-the-art. Finally, we use explainable AI techniques to gain an understanding of the drivers of model deterioration. We release an open source Python package, doubt, which implements our proposed methods, as well as the code used to reproduce our experiments.

Related papers

• Error-Driven Uncertainty Aware Training [7.702016079410588]
  Error-Driven Uncertainty Aware Training aims to enhance the ability of neural models to estimate their uncertainty correctly. The EUAT approach operates during the model's training phase by selectively employing two loss functions depending on whether the training examples are correctly or incorrectly predicted. We evaluate EUAT using diverse neural models and datasets in the image recognition domains considering both non-adversarial and adversarial settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-02T11:48:14Z)
• ALUM: Adversarial Data Uncertainty Modeling from Latent Model Uncertainty Compensation [25.67258563807856]
  We propose a novel method called ALUM to handle the model uncertainty and data uncertainty in a unified scheme. Our proposed ALUM is model-agnostic which can be easily implemented into any existing deep model with little extra overhead.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-29T17:24:12Z)
• Uncertainty Quantification for Local Model Explanations Without Model Access [0.44241702149260353]
  We present a model-agnostic algorithm for generating post-hoc explanations for a machine learning model. Our algorithm uses a bootstrapping approach to quantify the uncertainty that inevitably arises when generating explanations from a finite sample of model queries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-13T21:18:00Z)
• The Implicit Delta Method [61.36121543728134]
  In this paper, we propose an alternative, the implicit delta method, which works by infinitesimally regularizing the training loss of uncertainty. We show that the change in the evaluation due to regularization is consistent for the variance of the evaluation estimator, even when the infinitesimal change is approximated by a finite difference.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-11T19:34:17Z)
• A Geometric Method for Improved Uncertainty Estimation in Real-time [13.588210692213568]
  Post-hoc model calibrations can improve models' uncertainty estimations without the need for retraining. Our work puts forward a geometric-based approach for uncertainty estimation. We show that our method yields better uncertainty estimations than recently proposed approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-23T09:18:05Z)
• Data Uncertainty without Prediction Models [0.8223798883838329]
  We propose an uncertainty estimation method named a Distance-weighted Class Impurity without explicit use of prediction models. We verified that the Distance-weighted Class Impurity works effectively regardless of prediction models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-25T13:26:06Z)
• Leveraging Unlabeled Data to Predict Out-of-Distribution Performance [63.740181251997306]
  Real-world machine learning deployments are characterized by mismatches between the source (training) and target (test) distributions. In this work, we investigate methods for predicting the target domain accuracy using only labeled source data and unlabeled target data. We propose Average Thresholded Confidence (ATC), a practical method that learns a threshold on the model's confidence, predicting accuracy as the fraction of unlabeled examples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-11T23:01:12Z)
• Tracking the risk of a deployed model and detecting harmful distribution shifts [105.27463615756733]
  In practice, it may make sense to ignore benign shifts, under which the performance of a deployed model does not degrade substantially. We argue that a sensible method for firing off a warning has to both (a) detect harmful shifts while ignoring benign ones, and (b) allow continuous monitoring of model performance without increasing the false alarm rate.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-12T17:21:41Z)
• Training on Test Data with Bayesian Adaptation for Covariate Shift [96.3250517412545]
  Deep neural networks often make inaccurate predictions with unreliable uncertainty estimates. We derive a Bayesian model that provides for a well-defined relationship between unlabeled inputs under distributional shift and model parameters. We show that our method improves both accuracy and uncertainty estimation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-27T01:09:08Z)
• Imputation-Free Learning from Incomplete Observations [73.15386629370111]
  We introduce the importance of guided gradient descent (IGSGD) method to train inference from inputs containing missing values without imputation. We employ reinforcement learning (RL) to adjust the gradients used to train the models via back-propagation. Our imputation-free predictions outperform the traditional two-step imputation-based predictions using state-of-the-art imputation methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-05T12:44:39Z)
• Scalable Marginal Likelihood Estimation for Model Selection in Deep Learning [78.83598532168256]
  Marginal-likelihood based model-selection is rarely used in deep learning due to estimation difficulties. Our work shows that marginal likelihoods can improve generalization and be useful when validation data is unavailable.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-11T09:50:24Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.