Empirical Estimates on Hand Manipulation are Recoverable: A Step Towards Individualized and Explainable Robotic Support in Everyday Activities

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2201.11824v1
• Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2022 22:15:56 GMT
• Title: Empirical Estimates on Hand Manipulation are Recoverable: A Step Towards Individualized and Explainable Robotic Support in Everyday Activities
• Authors: Alexander Wich, Holger Schultheis, Michael Beetz
• Abstract summary: Key challenge for robotic systems is to figure out the behavior of another agent. Processing correct inferences is especially challenging when (confounding) factors are not controlled experimentally. We propose equipping robots with the necessary tools to conduct observational studies on people.
• Score: 80.37857025201036
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: A key challenge for robotic systems is to figure out the behavior of another agent. The capability to draw correct inferences is crucial to derive human behavior from examples. Processing correct inferences is especially challenging when (confounding) factors are not controlled experimentally (observational evidence). For this reason, robots that rely on inferences that are correlational risk a biased interpretation of the evidence. We propose equipping robots with the necessary tools to conduct observational studies on people. Specifically, we propose and explore the feasibility of structural causal models with non-parametric estimators to derive empirical estimates on hand behavior in the context of object manipulation in a virtual kitchen scenario. In particular, we focus on inferences under (the weaker) conditions of partial confounding (the model covering only some factors) and confront estimators with hundreds of samples instead of the typical order of thousands. Studying these conditions explores the boundaries of the approach and its viability. Despite the challenging conditions, the estimates inferred from the validation data are correct. Moreover, these estimates are stable against three refutation strategies where four estimators are in agreement. Furthermore, the causal quantity for two individuals reveals the sensibility of the approach to detect positive and negative effects. The validity, stability and explainability of the approach are encouraging and serve as the foundation for further research.

Related papers

• Decoding Susceptibility: Modeling Misbelief to Misinformation Through a Computational Approach [61.04606493712002]
  Susceptibility to misinformation describes the degree of belief in unverifiable claims that is not observable. Existing susceptibility studies heavily rely on self-reported beliefs. We propose a computational approach to model users' latent susceptibility levels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-16T07:22:56Z)
• Simulation-Based Counterfactual Causal Discovery on Real World Driver Behaviour [6.273003557777915]
  We present three variants of the proposed counterfactual causal discovery method. We evaluate these against state of the art observational temporal causal discovery methods across 3396 causal scenes extracted from a real world driving dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-06T02:10:20Z)
• Nonparametric Identifiability of Causal Representations from Unknown Interventions [63.1354734978244]
  We study causal representation learning, the task of inferring latent causal variables and their causal relations from mixtures of the variables. Our goal is to identify both the ground truth latents and their causal graph up to a set of ambiguities which we show to be irresolvable from interventional data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-01T10:51:58Z)
• Exploring the Trade-off between Plausibility, Change Intensity and Adversarial Power in Counterfactual Explanations using Multi-objective Optimization [73.89239820192894]
  We argue that automated counterfactual generation should regard several aspects of the produced adversarial instances. We present a novel framework for the generation of counterfactual examples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-20T15:02:53Z)
• Cross-model Fairness: Empirical Study of Fairness and Ethics Under Model Multiplicity [10.144058870887061]
  We argue that individuals can be harmed when one predictor is chosen ad hoc from a group of equally well performing models. Our findings suggest that such unfairness can be readily found in real life and it may be difficult to mitigate by technical means alone.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-14T14:33:39Z)
• On Causally Disentangled Representations [18.122893077772993]
  We present an analysis of disentangled representations through the notion of disentangled causal process. We show that our metrics capture the desiderata of disentangled causal process. We perform an empirical study on state of the art disentangled representation learners using our metrics and dataset to evaluate them from causal perspective.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-10T18:56:27Z)
• A Bayesian Account of Measures of Interpretability in Human-AI Interaction [34.99424576619341]
  Existing approaches for the design of interpretable agent behavior consider different measures of interpretability in isolation. We propose a revised model where all these behaviors can be meaningfully modeled together. We will highlight interesting consequences of this unified model and motivate, through results of a user study.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-22T03:28:28Z)
• Double Robust Representation Learning for Counterfactual Prediction [68.78210173955001]
  We propose a novel scalable method to learn double-robust representations for counterfactual predictions. We make robust and efficient counterfactual predictions for both individual and average treatment effects. The algorithm shows competitive performance with the state-of-the-art on real world and synthetic data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-15T16:39:26Z)
• Enabling Counterfactual Survival Analysis with Balanced Representations [64.17342727357618]
  Survival data are frequently encountered across diverse medical applications, i.e., drug development, risk profiling, and clinical trials. We propose a theoretically grounded unified framework for counterfactual inference applicable to survival outcomes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-14T01:15:00Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.