Regulatory Instruments for Fair Personalized Pricing

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2202.04245v2
• Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2022 13:07:43 GMT
• Title: Regulatory Instruments for Fair Personalized Pricing
• Authors: Renzhe Xu, Xingxuan Zhang, Peng Cui, Bo Li, Zheyan Shen, Jiazheng Xu
• Abstract summary: We investigate the optimal pricing strategy of a profit-maximizing monopoly under both regulatory constraints and the impact of imposing them on consumer surplus, producer surplus, and social welfare. Our findings and insights shed light on regulatory policy design for the increasingly monopolized business in the digital era.
• Score: 34.986747852934634
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Personalized pricing is a business strategy to charge different prices to individual consumers based on their characteristics and behaviors. It has become common practice in many industries nowadays due to the availability of a growing amount of high granular consumer data. The discriminatory nature of personalized pricing has triggered heated debates among policymakers and academics on how to design regulation policies to balance market efficiency and equity. In this paper, we propose two sound policy instruments, i.e., capping the range of the personalized prices or their ratios. We investigate the optimal pricing strategy of a profit-maximizing monopoly under both regulatory constraints and the impact of imposing them on consumer surplus, producer surplus, and social welfare. We theoretically prove that both proposed constraints can help balance consumer surplus and producer surplus at the expense of total surplus for common demand distributions, such as uniform, logistic, and exponential distributions. Experiments on both simulation and real-world datasets demonstrate the correctness of these theoretical results. Our findings and insights shed light on regulatory policy design for the increasingly monopolized business in the digital era.

Related papers

• A Primal-Dual Online Learning Approach for Dynamic Pricing of Sequentially Displayed Complementary Items under Sale Constraints [54.46126953873298]
  We address the problem of dynamically pricing complementary items that are sequentially displayed to customers. Coherent pricing policies for complementary items are essential because optimizing the pricing of each item individually is ineffective. We empirically evaluate our approach using synthetic settings randomly generated from real-world data, and compare its performance in terms of constraints violation and regret.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-08T09:55:31Z)
• Fairness Incentives in Response to Unfair Dynamic Pricing [7.991187769447732]
  We design a basic simulated economy, wherein we generate corporate taxation schedules geared to incentivizing firms towards adopting fair pricing behaviours. To cover a range of possible policy scenarios, we formulate our social planner's learning problem as a multi-armed bandit, a contextual bandit and as a full reinforcement learning (RL) problem. We find that social welfare improves on that of the fairness-agnostic baseline, and approaches that of the analytically optimal fairness-aware baseline for the multi-armed and contextual bandit settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-22T23:12:58Z)
• Structured Dynamic Pricing: Optimal Regret in a Global Shrinkage Model [50.06663781566795]
  We consider a dynamic model with the consumers' preferences as well as price sensitivity varying over time. We measure the performance of a dynamic pricing policy via regret, which is the expected revenue loss compared to a clairvoyant that knows the sequence of model parameters in advance. Our regret analysis results not only demonstrate optimality of the proposed policy but also show that for policy planning it is essential to incorporate available structural information.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-28T00:23:23Z)
• Finding Regularized Competitive Equilibria of Heterogeneous Agent Macroeconomic Models with Reinforcement Learning [151.03738099494765]
  We study a heterogeneous agent macroeconomic model with an infinite number of households and firms competing in a labor market. We propose a data-driven reinforcement learning framework that finds the regularized competitive equilibrium of the model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-24T17:16:27Z)
• Stochastic Online Fisher Markets: Static Pricing Limits and Adaptive Enhancements [3.2732273647357437]
  We study an online variant of Fisher markets, wherein users with privately known utility and budget parameters arrive sequentially. In this setting, we first study the limitations of static pricing algorithms, which set uniform prices for all users. We design adaptive posted-pricing algorithms, one with knowledge of the distribution of users' budget and utility parameters and another that adjusts prices solely based on past observations of user consumption.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-27T05:03:45Z)
• Towards Revenue Maximization with Popular and Profitable Products [69.21810902381009]
  A common goal for companies marketing is to maximize the return revenue/profit by utilizing the various effective marketing strategies. Finding credible and reliable information on products' profitability is difficult since most products tends to peak at certain times. This paper proposes a general profit-oriented framework to address the problem of revenue based on economic behavior, and conducting the 0n-shelf Popular and most Profitable Products (OPPPs) for the targeted marketing.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-26T02:07:25Z)
• Electricity Consumption Forecasting for Out-of-distribution Time-of-Use Tariffs [14.524613608854242]
  In electricity markets, retailers or brokers want to maximize profits by allocating tariff profiles to end consumers. We consider a greedy solution to maximize the overall profit for brokers by optimal tariff profile allocation. This in-turn requires forecasting electricity consumption for each user for all tariff profiles.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-11T09:13:55Z)
• Fairness, Welfare, and Equity in Personalized Pricing [88.9134799076718]
  We study the interplay of fairness, welfare, and equity considerations in personalized pricing based on customer features. We show the potential benefits of personalized pricing in two settings: pricing subsidies for an elective vaccine, and the effects of personalized interest rates on downstream outcomes in microcredit.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-21T01:01:56Z)
• Model Distillation for Revenue Optimization: Interpretable Personalized Pricing [8.07517029746865]
  We present a customized, prescriptive tree-based algorithm that distills knowledge from a complex black-box machine learning algorithm. It segments customers with similar valuations and prescribes prices in such a way that maximizes revenue while maintaining interpretability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-03T18:33:23Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.