Similarity learning for wells based on logging data

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2202.05583v1
• Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2022 12:47:56 GMT
• Title: Similarity learning for wells based on logging data
• Authors: Evgenia Romanenkova, Alina Rogulina, Anuar Shakirov, Nikolay Stulov, Alexey Zaytsev, Leyla Ismailova, Dmitry Kovalev, Klemens Katterbauer, Abdallah AlShehri
• Abstract summary: We propose a novel framework to solve the geological profile similarity estimation based on a deep learning model. Our similarity model takes well-logging data as input and provides the similarity of wells as output. For model testing, we used two open datasets originating in New Zealand and Norway.
• Score: 8.265576412171702
• License: http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
• Abstract: One of the first steps during the investigation of geological objects is the interwell correlation. It provides information on the structure of the objects under study, as it comprises the framework for constructing geological models and assessing hydrocarbon reserves. Today, the detailed interwell correlation relies on manual analysis of well-logging data. Thus, it is time-consuming and of a subjective nature. The essence of the interwell correlation constitutes an assessment of the similarities between geological profiles. There were many attempts to automate the process of interwell correlation by means of rule-based approaches, classic machine learning approaches, and deep learning approaches in the past. However, most approaches are of limited usage and inherent subjectivity of experts. We propose a novel framework to solve the geological profile similarity estimation based on a deep learning model. Our similarity model takes well-logging data as input and provides the similarity of wells as output. The developed framework enables (1) extracting patterns and essential characteristics of geological profiles within the wells and (2) model training following the unsupervised paradigm without the need for manual analysis and interpretation of well-logging data. For model testing, we used two open datasets originating in New Zealand and Norway. Our data-based similarity models provide high performance: the accuracy of our model is $0.926$ compared to $0.787$ for baselines based on the popular gradient boosting approach. With them, an oil\&gas practitioner can improve interwell correlation quality and reduce operation time.

Related papers

• Surrogate Model for Geological CO2 Storage and Its Use in Hierarchical MCMC History Matching [0.0]
  We extend the recently introduced recurrent R-U-Net surrogate model to treat geomodel realizations drawn from a wide range of geological scenarios. We show that, using observed data from monitoring wells in synthetic true' models, geological uncertainty is reduced substantially.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-11T18:29:28Z)
• Comparing Foundation Models using Data Kernels [13.099029073152257]
  We present a methodology for directly comparing the embedding space geometry of foundation models. Our methodology is grounded in random graph theory and enables valid hypothesis testing of embedding similarity. We show how our framework can induce a manifold of models equipped with a distance function that correlates strongly with several downstream metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-09T02:01:07Z)
• Less is More: Mitigate Spurious Correlations for Open-Domain Dialogue Response Generation Models by Causal Discovery [52.95935278819512]
  We conduct the first study on spurious correlations for open-domain response generation models based on a corpus CGDIALOG curated in our work. Inspired by causal discovery algorithms, we propose a novel model-agnostic method for training and inference of response generation model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-02T06:33:48Z)
• Are Neural Topic Models Broken? [81.15470302729638]
  We study the relationship between automated and human evaluation of topic models. We find that neural topic models fare worse in both respects compared to an established classical method.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-28T14:38:50Z)
• A Correlation-Ratio Transfer Learning and Variational Stein's Paradox [7.652701739127332]
  This paper introduces a new strategy, linear correlation-ratio, to build an accurate relationship between the models. On the practical side, the new framework is applied to some application scenarios, especially the areas of data streams and medical studies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-10T01:59:16Z)
• Temporal Relevance Analysis for Video Action Models [70.39411261685963]
  We first propose a new approach to quantify the temporal relationships between frames captured by CNN-based action models. We then conduct comprehensive experiments and in-depth analysis to provide a better understanding of how temporal modeling is affected.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-25T19:06:48Z)
• A Topological-Framework to Improve Analysis of Machine Learning Model Performance [5.3893373617126565]
  We propose a framework for evaluating machine learning models in which a dataset is treated as a "space" on which a model operates. We describe a topological data structure, presheaves, which offer a convenient way to store and analyze model performance between different subpopulations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-09T23:11:13Z)
• Integrating Semantics and Neighborhood Information with Graph-Driven Generative Models for Document Retrieval [51.823187647843945]
  In this paper, we encode the neighborhood information with a graph-induced Gaussian distribution, and propose to integrate the two types of information with a graph-driven generative model. Under the approximation, we prove that the training objective can be decomposed into terms involving only singleton or pairwise documents, enabling the model to be trained as efficiently as uncorrelated ones.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-27T11:29:03Z)
• Interpretable Multi-dataset Evaluation for Named Entity Recognition [110.64368106131062]
  We present a general methodology for interpretable evaluation for the named entity recognition (NER) task. The proposed evaluation method enables us to interpret the differences in models and datasets, as well as the interplay between them. By making our analysis tool available, we make it easy for future researchers to run similar analyses and drive progress in this area.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-13T10:53:27Z)
• Goal-directed Generation of Discrete Structures with Conditional Generative Models [85.51463588099556]
  We introduce a novel approach to directly optimize a reinforcement learning objective, maximizing an expected reward. We test our methodology on two tasks: generating molecules with user-defined properties and identifying short python expressions which evaluate to a given target value.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-05T20:03:13Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.