Critical Checkpoints for Evaluating Defence Models Against Adversarial Attack and Robustness

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2202.09039v1
• Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2022 06:15:49 GMT
• Title: Critical Checkpoints for Evaluating Defence Models Against Adversarial Attack and Robustness
• Authors: Kanak Tekwani, Manojkumar Parmar
• Abstract summary: Some common flaws are been noticed in the past defence models that were broken in very short time. In this paper, we have suggested few checkpoints that should be taken into consideration while building and evaluating the soundness of defence models.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: From past couple of years there is a cycle of researchers proposing a defence model for adversaries in machine learning which is arguably defensible to most of the existing attacks in restricted condition (they evaluate on some bounded inputs or datasets). And then shortly another set of researcher finding the vulnerabilities in that defence model and breaking it by proposing a stronger attack model. Some common flaws are been noticed in the past defence models that were broken in very short time. Defence models being broken so easily is a point of concern as decision of many crucial activities are taken with the help of machine learning models. So there is an utter need of some defence checkpoints that any researcher should keep in mind while evaluating the soundness of technique and declaring it to be decent defence technique. In this paper, we have suggested few checkpoints that should be taken into consideration while building and evaluating the soundness of defence models. All these points are recommended after observing why some past defence models failed and how some model remained adamant and proved their soundness against some of the very strong attacks.

Related papers

• Versatile Defense Against Adversarial Attacks on Image Recognition [2.9980620769521513]
  Defending against adversarial attacks in a real-life setting can be compared to the way antivirus software works. It appears that a defense method based on image-to-image translation may be capable of this. The trained model has successfully improved the classification accuracy from nearly zero to an average of 86%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-13T01:48:01Z)
• Diffence: Fencing Membership Privacy With Diffusion Models [16.447035745151428]
  We introduce a novel framework against membership attacks by leveraging generative models. Our approach can serve as a robust plug-n-play defense mechanism, enhancing membership privacy without compromising model utility.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-07T20:45:09Z)
• Efficient Defense Against Model Stealing Attacks on Convolutional Neural Networks [0.548924822963045]
  Model stealing attacks can lead to intellectual property theft and other security and privacy risks. Current state-of-the-art defenses against model stealing attacks suggest adding perturbations to the prediction probabilities. We propose a simple yet effective and efficient defense alternative.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-04T22:25:49Z)
• Isolation and Induction: Training Robust Deep Neural Networks against Model Stealing Attacks [51.51023951695014]
  Existing model stealing defenses add deceptive perturbations to the victim's posterior probabilities to mislead the attackers. This paper proposes Isolation and Induction (InI), a novel and effective training framework for model stealing defenses. In contrast to adding perturbations over model predictions that harm the benign accuracy, we train models to produce uninformative outputs against stealing queries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-02T05:54:01Z)
• Randomness in ML Defenses Helps Persistent Attackers and Hinders Evaluators [49.52538232104449]
  It is becoming increasingly imperative to design robust ML defenses. Recent work has found that many defenses that initially resist state-of-the-art attacks can be broken by an adaptive adversary. We take steps to simplify the design of defenses and argue that white-box defenses should eschew randomness when possible.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-27T01:33:31Z)
• MultiRobustBench: Benchmarking Robustness Against Multiple Attacks [86.70417016955459]
  We present the first unified framework for considering multiple attacks against machine learning (ML) models. Our framework is able to model different levels of learner's knowledge about the test-time adversary. We evaluate the performance of 16 defended models for robustness against a set of 9 different attack types.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-21T20:26:39Z)
• Evaluating the Adversarial Robustness of Adaptive Test-time Defenses [60.55448652445904]
  We categorize such adaptive testtime defenses and explain their potential benefits and drawbacks. Unfortunately, none significantly improve upon static models when evaluated appropriately. Some even weaken the underlying static model while simultaneously increasing inference cost.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-28T12:11:40Z)
• Fighting Gradients with Gradients: Dynamic Defenses against Adversarial Attacks [72.59081183040682]
  We propose dynamic defenses, to adapt the model and input during testing, by defensive entropy minimization (dent) dent improves the robustness of adversarially-trained defenses and nominally-trained models against white-box, black-box, and adaptive attacks on CIFAR-10/100 and ImageNet.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-18T17:55:07Z)
• SPECTRE: Defending Against Backdoor Attacks Using Robust Statistics [44.487762480349765]
  A small fraction of poisoned data changes the behavior of a trained model when triggered by an attacker-specified watermark. We propose a novel defense algorithm using robust covariance estimation to amplify the spectral signature of corrupted data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-22T20:49:40Z)
• MAD-VAE: Manifold Awareness Defense Variational Autoencoder [0.0]
  We introduce several methods to improve the robustness of defense models. With extensive experiments on MNIST data set, we have demonstrated the effectiveness of our algorithms. We also discuss the applicability of existing adversarial latent space attacks as they may have a significant flaw.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-31T09:04:25Z)
• Reliable evaluation of adversarial robustness with an ensemble of diverse parameter-free attacks [65.20660287833537]
  In this paper we propose two extensions of the PGD-attack overcoming failures due to suboptimal step size and problems of the objective function. We then combine our novel attacks with two complementary existing ones to form a parameter-free, computationally affordable and user-independent ensemble of attacks to test adversarial robustness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-03T18:15:55Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.