AI agents for facilitating social interactions and wellbeing
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2203.06244v1
- Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2022 04:05:23 GMT
- Title: AI agents for facilitating social interactions and wellbeing
- Authors: Hiro Taiyo Hamada and Ryota Kanai
- Abstract summary: We provide an overview of the mediative role of AI-augmented agents for social interactions.
We discuss opportunities and challenges of the relational approach with wellbeing AI to promote wellbeing in our societies.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Wellbeing AI has been becoming a new trend in individuals' mental health,
organizational health, and flourishing our societies. Various applications of
wellbeing AI have been introduced to our daily lives. While social
relationships within groups are a critical factor for wellbeing, the
development of wellbeing AI for social interactions remains relatively scarce.
In this paper, we provide an overview of the mediative role of AI-augmented
agents for social interactions. First, we discuss the two-dimensional framework
for classifying wellbeing AI: individual/group and analysis/intervention.
Furthermore, wellbeing AI touches on intervening social relationships between
human-human interactions since positive social relationships are key to human
wellbeing. This intervention may raise technical and ethical challenges. We
discuss opportunities and challenges of the relational approach with wellbeing
AI to promote wellbeing in our societies.
Related papers
- Advancing Social Intelligence in AI Agents: Technical Challenges and Open Questions [67.60397632819202]
Building socially-intelligent AI agents (Social-AI) is a multidisciplinary, multimodal research goal.
We identify a set of underlying technical challenges and open questions for researchers across computing communities to advance Social-AI.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-17T02:57:42Z) - AI for social science and social science of AI: A Survey [47.5235291525383]
Recent advancements in artificial intelligence have sparked a rethinking of artificial general intelligence possibilities.
The increasing human-like capabilities of AI are also attracting attention in social science research.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-22T10:57:09Z) - SOTOPIA: Interactive Evaluation for Social Intelligence in Language Agents [107.4138224020773]
We present SOTOPIA, an open-ended environment to simulate complex social interactions between artificial agents and humans.
In our environment, agents role-play and interact under a wide variety of scenarios; they coordinate, collaborate, exchange, and compete with each other to achieve complex social goals.
We find that GPT-4 achieves a significantly lower goal completion rate than humans and struggles to exhibit social commonsense reasoning and strategic communication skills.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-18T02:27:01Z) - Discriminatory or Samaritan -- which AI is needed for humanity? An
Evolutionary Game Theory Analysis of Hybrid Human-AI populations [0.5308606035361203]
We study how different forms of AI influence the evolution of cooperation in a human population playing the one-shot Prisoner's Dilemma game.
We found that Samaritan AI agents that help everyone unconditionally, including defectors, can promote higher levels of cooperation in humans than Discriminatory AIs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-30T15:56:26Z) - Fairness in AI and Its Long-Term Implications on Society [68.8204255655161]
We take a closer look at AI fairness and analyze how lack of AI fairness can lead to deepening of biases over time.
We discuss how biased models can lead to more negative real-world outcomes for certain groups.
If the issues persist, they could be reinforced by interactions with other risks and have severe implications on society in the form of social unrest.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-04-16T11:22:59Z) - Positive AI: Key Challenges in Designing Artificial Intelligence for
Wellbeing [0.5461938536945723]
Many people are increasingly worried about AI's impact on their lives.
To ensure AI progresses beneficially, some researchers have proposed "wellbeing" as a key objective to govern AI.
This article addresses key challenges in designing AI for wellbeing.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-04-12T12:43:00Z) - Trustworthy AI: A Computational Perspective [54.80482955088197]
We focus on six of the most crucial dimensions in achieving trustworthy AI: (i) Safety & Robustness, (ii) Non-discrimination & Fairness, (iii) Explainability, (iv) Privacy, (v) Accountability & Auditability, and (vi) Environmental Well-Being.
For each dimension, we review the recent related technologies according to a taxonomy and summarize their applications in real-world systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-07-12T14:21:46Z) - Envisioning Communities: A Participatory Approach Towards AI for Social
Good [10.504838259488844]
We argue that AI for social good ought to be assessed by the communities that the AI system will impact.
We show how the capabilities approach aligns with a participatory approach for the design and implementation of AI for social good research.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-05-04T21:40:04Z) - The Short Anthropological Guide to the Study of Ethical AI [91.3755431537592]
Short guide serves as both an introduction to AI ethics and social science and anthropological perspectives on the development of AI.
Aims to provide those unfamiliar with the field with an insight into the societal impact of AI systems and how, in turn, these systems can lead us to rethink how our world operates.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-07T12:25:03Z) - AI-Mediated Exchange Theory [9.100327242239203]
We propose the development of a framework AI-Mediated Exchange Theory (AI-MET)
As an extension to Social Exchange Theory (SET) in the social sciences, AI-MET views AI as influencing human-to-human relationships via a taxonomy of mediation mechanisms.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-03-04T14:18:18Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.