How to Learn from Risk: Explicit Risk-Utility Reinforcement Learning for Efficient and Safe Driving Strategies

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2203.08409v1
• Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2022 05:51:22 GMT
• Title: How to Learn from Risk: Explicit Risk-Utility Reinforcement Learning for Efficient and Safe Driving Strategies
• Authors: Lukas M. Schmidt, Sebastian Rietsch, Axel Plinge, Bjoern M. Eskofier, Christopher Mutschler
• Abstract summary: This paper proposes SafeDQN, which allows to make the behavior of autonomous vehicles safe and interpretable while still being efficient. We show that SafeDQN finds interpretable and safe driving policies for a variety of scenarios and demonstrate how state-of-the-art saliency techniques can help to assess both risk and utility.
• Score: 1.496194593196997
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Autonomous driving has the potential to revolutionize mobility and is hence an active area of research. In practice, the behavior of autonomous vehicles must be acceptable, i.e., efficient, safe, and interpretable. While vanilla reinforcement learning (RL) finds performant behavioral strategies, they are often unsafe and uninterpretable. Safety is introduced through Safe RL approaches, but they still mostly remain uninterpretable as the learned behaviour is jointly optimized for safety and performance without modeling them separately. Interpretable machine learning is rarely applied to RL. This paper proposes SafeDQN, which allows to make the behavior of autonomous vehicles safe and interpretable while still being efficient. SafeDQN offers an understandable, semantic trade-off between the expected risk and the utility of actions while being algorithmically transparent. We show that SafeDQN finds interpretable and safe driving policies for a variety of scenarios and demonstrate how state-of-the-art saliency techniques can help to assess both risk and utility.

Related papers

• ActSafe: Active Exploration with Safety Constraints for Reinforcement Learning [48.536695794883826]
  We present ActSafe, a novel model-based RL algorithm for safe and efficient exploration. We show that ActSafe guarantees safety during learning while also obtaining a near-optimal policy in finite time. In addition, we propose a practical variant of ActSafe that builds on latest model-based RL advancements.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-12T10:46:02Z)
• RACER: Epistemic Risk-Sensitive RL Enables Fast Driving with Fewer Crashes [57.319845580050924]
  We propose a reinforcement learning framework that combines risk-sensitive control with an adaptive action space curriculum. We show that our algorithm is capable of learning high-speed policies for a real-world off-road driving task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-07T23:32:36Z)
• Evaluation of Safety Constraints in Autonomous Navigation with Deep Reinforcement Learning [62.997667081978825]
  We compare two learnable navigation policies: safe and unsafe. The safe policy takes the constraints into the account, while the other does not. We show that the safe policy is able to generate trajectories with more clearance (distance to the obstacles) and makes less collisions while training without sacrificing the overall performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-27T01:04:57Z)
• Risk-Aware Reward Shaping of Reinforcement Learning Agents for Autonomous Driving [6.613838702441967]
  This paper investigates how to use risk-aware reward shaping to leverage the training and test performance of RL agents in autonomous driving. We propose additional reshaped reward terms that encourage exploration and penalize risky driving behaviors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-05T20:10:36Z)
• Safety Correction from Baseline: Towards the Risk-aware Policy in Robotics via Dual-agent Reinforcement Learning [64.11013095004786]
  We propose a dual-agent safe reinforcement learning strategy consisting of a baseline and a safe agent. Such a decoupled framework enables high flexibility, data efficiency and risk-awareness for RL-based control. The proposed method outperforms the state-of-the-art safe RL algorithms on difficult robot locomotion and manipulation tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-14T03:11:25Z)
• Safe Reinforcement Learning with Contrastive Risk Prediction [35.80144544954927]
  We propose a risk preventive training method for safe RL, which learns a statistical contrastive classifier to predict the probability of a state-action pair leading to unsafe states. Based on the predicted risk probabilities, we can collect risk preventive trajectories and reshape the reward function with risk penalties to induce safe RL policies. The results show the proposed approach has comparable performance with the state-of-the-art model-based methods and outperforms conventional model-free safe RL approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-10T18:54:38Z)
• Minimizing Safety Interference for Safe and Comfortable Automated Driving with Distributional Reinforcement Learning [3.923354711049903]
  We propose a distributional reinforcement learning framework to learn adaptive policies that can tune their level of conservativity at run-time based on the desired comfort and utility. We show that our algorithm learns policies that can still drive reliable when the perception noise is two times higher than the training configuration for automated merging and crossing at occluded intersections.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-15T13:36:55Z)
• Driving-Policy Adaptive Safeguard for Autonomous Vehicles Using Reinforcement Learning [19.71676985220504]
  This paper proposes a driving-policy adaptive safeguard (DPAS) design, including a collision avoidance strategy and an activation function. The driving-policy adaptive activation function should dynamically assess current driving policy risk and kick in when an urgent threat is detected. The results are calibrated by naturalistic driving data and show that the proposed safeguard reduces the collision rate significantly without introducing more interventions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-02T08:01:53Z)
• Learning to be Safe: Deep RL with a Safety Critic [72.00568333130391]
  A natural first approach toward safe RL is to manually specify constraints on the policy's behavior. We propose to learn how to be safe in one set of tasks and environments, and then use that learned intuition to constrain future behaviors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-27T20:53:20Z)
• Safe Reinforcement Learning via Curriculum Induction [94.67835258431202]
  In safety-critical applications, autonomous agents may need to learn in an environment where mistakes can be very costly. Existing safe reinforcement learning methods make an agent rely on priors that let it avoid dangerous situations. This paper presents an alternative approach inspired by human teaching, where an agent learns under the supervision of an automatic instructor.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-22T10:48:17Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.