Co-constructing Shared Values and Ethical Practice for the Next Generation: Lessons Learned from a Curriculum on Information Ethics

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2204.02728v1
• Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2022 11:09:23 GMT
• Title: Co-constructing Shared Values and Ethical Practice for the Next Generation: Lessons Learned from a Curriculum on Information Ethics
• Authors: Thomas Baudel
• Abstract summary: We present the motivation, design, outline, and lessons learned from an online course in scientific integrity, research ethics, and information ethics. The goal of such a training is not so much to equip students, but to make them aware of the impact of their work on society. While we provide conceptual tools, this is more to sustain interest and engage students.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: We present the motivation, design, outline, and lessons learned from an online course in scientific integrity, research ethics, and information ethics provided to over 2000 doctoral and engineering students in STEM fields, first at the University Paris-Saclay, and now expanded to an online MOOC available to students across the world, in English. Unlike a course in scientific domains, meant to provide students with methods, tools, and concepts they can apply in their future career, the goal of such a training is not so much to equip them, but to make them aware of the impact of their work on society, care about the responsibilities that befall on them, and make them realize not all share the same opinions on how should technology imprint society. While we provide conceptual tools, this is more to sustain interest and engage students. We want them to debate on concrete ethical issues and realize the difficulty of reconciling positions on contemporary dilemma such as dematerialized intellectual property, freedom of expression online and its counterparts, the protection of our digital selves, the management of algorithmic decision, the control of autonomous systems, and the resolution of the digital divide. As a bold shortcut, our course is about introducing and motivating Hegelian dialectics in STEM curricula, usually more bent on an Aristotelian perspective.

Related papers

• Artificial Intelligence in Education: Ethical Considerations and Insights from Ancient Greek Philosophy [0.3108011671896571]
  The paper argues that while AI presents significant challenges, a balanced approach informed by classical philosophical thought can lead to an ethically sound transformation of education. It emphasizes the evolving role of teachers as facilitators and the importance of fostering student initiative in AI-rich environments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-04T08:59:38Z)
• Now, Later, and Lasting: Ten Priorities for AI Research, Policy, and Practice [63.20307830884542]
  Next several decades may well be a turning point for humanity, comparable to the industrial revolution. Launched a decade ago, the project is committed to a perpetual series of studies by multidisciplinary experts. We offer ten recommendations for action that collectively address both the short- and long-term potential impacts of AI technologies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-06T22:18:31Z)
• Understanding Teacher Perspectives and Experiences after Deployment of AI Literacy Curriculum in Middle-school Classrooms [12.35885897302579]
  We investigate the experiences of seven teachers following their implementation of modules from the MIT RAICA curriculum. Our analysis suggests that the AI modules expanded our teachers' knowledge in the field. Our teachers advocated their need for better external support when navigating technological resources.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-08T05:36:16Z)
• Unpacking the Ethical Value Alignment in Big Models [46.560886177083084]
  This paper provides an overview of the risks and challenges associated with big models, surveys existing AI ethics guidelines, and examines the ethical implications arising from the limitations of these models. We introduce a novel conceptual paradigm for aligning the ethical values of big models and discuss promising research directions for alignment criteria, evaluation, and method.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-26T16:45:40Z)
• What Students Can Learn About Artificial Intelligence -- Recommendations for K-12 Computing Education [0.0]
  Technological advances in the context of digital transformation are the basis for rapid developments in the field of artificial intelligence (AI) An increasing number of computer science curricula are being extended to include the topic of AI. This paper presents a curriculum of learning objectives that addresses digital literacy and the societal perspective in particular.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-10T20:39:43Z)
• Beyond case studies: Teaching data science critique and ethics through sociotechnical surveillance studies [0.0]
  Ethics have become an urgent concern for data science research, practice, and instruction in the wake of growing critique of algorithms and systems showing that they reinforce structural oppression. We designed a data science ethics course that spoke to the social phenomena at the root of critical data studies through analysis of a pressing sociotechnical system: surveillance systems. Students developed critical analysis skills that allowed them to investigate surveillance systems of their own and identify their benefits, harms, main proponents, those who resist them.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-03T20:24:42Z)
• Ethics in Computing Education: Challenges and Experience with Embedded Ethics [4.226118870861363]
  We reflect on the many challenges and questions with effectively integrating ethics into modern computing curricula. We describe a case study of integrating ethics modules into the computer engineering curricula at Colorado State University.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-22T21:00:25Z)
• World Models and Predictive Coding for Cognitive and Developmental Robotics: Frontiers and Challenges [51.92834011423463]
  We focus on the two concepts of world models and predictive coding. In neuroscience, predictive coding proposes that the brain continuously predicts its inputs and adapts to model its own dynamics and control behavior in its environment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-14T06:38:14Z)
• Building Bridges: Generative Artworks to Explore AI Ethics [56.058588908294446]
  In recent years, there has been an increased emphasis on understanding and mitigating adverse impacts of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies on society. A significant challenge in the design of ethical AI systems is that there are multiple stakeholders in the AI pipeline, each with their own set of constraints and interests. This position paper outlines some potential ways in which generative artworks can play this role by serving as accessible and powerful educational tools.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-25T22:31:55Z)
• An interdisciplinary conceptual study of Artificial Intelligence (AI) for helping benefit-risk assessment practices: Towards a comprehensive qualification matrix of AI programs and devices (pre-print 2020) [55.41644538483948]
  This paper proposes a comprehensive analysis of existing concepts coming from different disciplines tackling the notion of intelligence. The aim is to identify shared notions or discrepancies to consider for qualifying AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-07T12:01:31Z)
• The Short Anthropological Guide to the Study of Ethical AI [91.3755431537592]
  Short guide serves as both an introduction to AI ethics and social science and anthropological perspectives on the development of AI. Aims to provide those unfamiliar with the field with an insight into the societal impact of AI systems and how, in turn, these systems can lead us to rethink how our world operates.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-07T12:25:03Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.