Imitating, Fast and Slow: Robust learning from demonstrations via decision-time planning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2204.03597v1
• Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2022 17:16:52 GMT
• Title: Imitating, Fast and Slow: Robust learning from demonstrations via decision-time planning
• Authors: Carl Qi, Pieter Abbeel, Aditya Grover
• Abstract summary: Planning at Test-time (IMPLANT) is a new meta-algorithm for imitation learning. We demonstrate that IMPLANT significantly outperforms benchmark imitation learning approaches on standard control environments.
• Score: 96.72185761508668
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The goal of imitation learning is to mimic expert behavior from demonstrations, without access to an explicit reward signal. A popular class of approach infers the (unknown) reward function via inverse reinforcement learning (IRL) followed by maximizing this reward function via reinforcement learning (RL). The policies learned via these approaches are however very brittle in practice and deteriorate quickly even with small test-time perturbations due to compounding errors. We propose Imitation with Planning at Test-time (IMPLANT), a new meta-algorithm for imitation learning that utilizes decision-time planning to correct for compounding errors of any base imitation policy. In contrast to existing approaches, we retain both the imitation policy and the rewards model at decision-time, thereby benefiting from the learning signal of the two components. Empirically, we demonstrate that IMPLANT significantly outperforms benchmark imitation learning approaches on standard control environments and excels at zero-shot generalization when subject to challenging perturbations in test-time dynamics.

Related papers

• Temporal-Difference Variational Continual Learning [89.32940051152782]
  A crucial capability of Machine Learning models in real-world applications is the ability to continuously learn new tasks. In Continual Learning settings, models often struggle to balance learning new tasks with retaining previous knowledge. We propose new learning objectives that integrate the regularization effects of multiple previous posterior estimations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-10T10:58:41Z)
• Unlearning with Control: Assessing Real-world Utility for Large Language Model Unlearning [97.2995389188179]
  Recent research has begun to approach large language models (LLMs) unlearning via gradient ascent (GA) Despite their simplicity and efficiency, we suggest that GA-based methods face the propensity towards excessive unlearning. We propose several controlling methods that can regulate the extent of excessive unlearning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-13T14:41:00Z)
• Validity Learning on Failures: Mitigating the Distribution Shift in Autonomous Vehicle Planning [2.3558144417896583]
  The planning problem constitutes a fundamental aspect of the autonomous driving framework. We propose Validity Learning on Failures, VL(on failure) as a remedy to address this issue. We show that VL(on failure) outperforms the state-of-the-art methods by a large margin.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-03T17:25:18Z)
• Assessor-Guided Learning for Continual Environments [17.181933166255448]
  This paper proposes an assessor-guided learning strategy for continual learning. An assessor guides the learning process of a base learner by controlling the direction and pace of the learning process. The assessor is trained in a meta-learning manner with a meta-objective to boost the learning process of the base learner.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-21T06:45:14Z)
• Sample-efficient Adversarial Imitation Learning [45.400080101596956]
  We propose a self-supervised representation-based adversarial imitation learning method to learn state and action representations. We show a 39% relative improvement over existing adversarial imitation learning methods on MuJoCo in a setting limited to 100 expert state-action pairs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-14T12:36:01Z)
• Imitating Past Successes can be Very Suboptimal [145.70788608016755]
  We show that existing outcome-conditioned imitation learning methods do not necessarily improve the policy. We show that a simple modification results in a method that does guarantee policy improvement. Our aim is not to develop an entirely new method, but rather to explain how a variant of outcome-conditioned imitation learning can be used to maximize rewards.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-07T15:13:43Z)
• Robust Learning from Observation with Model Misspecification [33.92371002674386]
  Imitation learning (IL) is a popular paradigm for training policies in robotic systems. We propose a robust IL algorithm to learn policies that can effectively transfer to the real environment without fine-tuning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-12T07:04:06Z)
• Imitation Learning by State-Only Distribution Matching [2.580765958706854]
  Imitation Learning from observation describes policy learning in a similar way to human learning. We propose a non-adversarial learning-from-observations approach, together with an interpretable convergence and performance metric.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-09T08:38:50Z)
• DEALIO: Data-Efficient Adversarial Learning for Imitation from Observation [57.358212277226315]
  In imitation learning from observation IfO, a learning agent seeks to imitate a demonstrating agent using only observations of the demonstrated behavior without access to the control signals generated by the demonstrator. Recent methods based on adversarial imitation learning have led to state-of-the-art performance on IfO problems, but they typically suffer from high sample complexity due to a reliance on data-inefficient, model-free reinforcement learning algorithms. This issue makes them impractical to deploy in real-world settings, where gathering samples can incur high costs in terms of time, energy, and risk. We propose a more data-efficient IfO algorithm
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-31T23:46:32Z)
• Reparameterized Variational Divergence Minimization for Stable Imitation [57.06909373038396]
  We study the extent to which variations in the choice of probabilistic divergence may yield more performant ILO algorithms. We contribute a re parameterization trick for adversarial imitation learning to alleviate the challenges of the promising $f$-divergence minimization framework. Empirically, we demonstrate that our design choices allow for ILO algorithms that outperform baseline approaches and more closely match expert performance in low-dimensional continuous-control tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-18T19:04:09Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.