Are We Really Making Much Progress in Text Classification? A Comparative Review

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2204.03954v5
• Date: Sun, 4 Jun 2023 17:40:32 GMT
• Title: Are We Really Making Much Progress in Text Classification? A Comparative Review
• Authors: Lukas Galke, Andor Diera, Bao Xin Lin, Bhakti Khera, Tim Meuser, Tushar Singhal, Fabian Karl, Ansgar Scherp
• Abstract summary: This study reviews and compares methods for single-label and multi-label text classification. Results reveal that all recently proposed graph-based and hierarchy-based methods fail to outperform pre-trained language models.
• Score: 2.579878570919875
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: This study reviews and compares methods for single-label and multi-label text classification, categorized into bag-of-words, sequence-based, graph-based, and hierarchical methods. The comparison aggregates results from the literature over five single-label and seven multi-label datasets and complements them with new experiments. The findings reveal that all recently proposed graph-based and hierarchy-based methods fail to outperform pre-trained language models and sometimes perform worse than standard machine learning methods like a multilayer perceptron on a bag-of-words. To assess the true scientific progress in text classification, future work should thoroughly test against strong bag-of-words baselines and state-of-the-art pre-trained language models.

Related papers

• Leveraging Annotator Disagreement for Text Classification [3.6625157427847963]
  It is common practice in text classification to only use one majority label for model training even if a dataset has been annotated by multiple annotators. This paper proposes three strategies to leverage annotator disagreement for text classification: a probability-based multi-label method, an ensemble system, and instruction tuning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-26T06:46:53Z)
• Language Models for Text Classification: Is In-Context Learning Enough? [54.869097980761595]
  Recent foundational language models have shown state-of-the-art performance in many NLP tasks in zero- and few-shot settings. An advantage of these models over more standard approaches is the ability to understand instructions written in natural language (prompts) This makes them suitable for addressing text classification problems for domains with limited amounts of annotated instances.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-26T12:47:39Z)
• XAI-CLASS: Explanation-Enhanced Text Classification with Extremely Weak Supervision [6.406111099707549]
  XAI-CLASS is a novel explanation-enhanced weakly-supervised text classification method. It incorporates word saliency prediction as an auxiliary task. XAI-CLASS outperforms other weakly-supervised text classification methods significantly.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-31T23:24:22Z)
• Evaluating Unsupervised Text Classification: Zero-shot and Similarity-based Approaches [0.6767885381740952]
  Similarity-based approaches attempt to classify instances based on similarities between text document representations and class description representations. Zero-shot text classification approaches aim to generalize knowledge gained from a training task by assigning appropriate labels of unknown classes to text documents. This paper conducts a systematic evaluation of different similarity-based and zero-shot approaches for text classification of unseen classes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-29T15:14:47Z)
• Hierarchical Heterogeneous Graph Representation Learning for Short Text Classification [60.233529926965836]
  We propose a new method called SHINE, which is based on graph neural network (GNN) for short text classification. First, we model the short text dataset as a hierarchical heterogeneous graph consisting of word-level component graphs. Then, we dynamically learn a short document graph that facilitates effective label propagation among similar short texts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-30T05:33:05Z)
• CLLD: Contrastive Learning with Label Distance for Text Classificatioin [0.6299766708197883]
  We propose Contrastive Learning with Label Distance (CLLD) for learning contrastive classes. CLLD ensures the flexibility within the subtle differences that lead to different label assignments. Our experiments suggest that the learned label distance relieve the adversarial nature of interclasses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-25T07:07:14Z)
• Multi-Label Image Classification with Contrastive Learning [57.47567461616912]
  We show that a direct application of contrastive learning can hardly improve in multi-label cases. We propose a novel framework for multi-label classification with contrastive learning in a fully supervised setting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-24T15:00:47Z)
• Sentiment analysis in tweets: an assessment study from classical to modern text representation models [59.107260266206445]
  Short texts published on Twitter have earned significant attention as a rich source of information. Their inherent characteristics, such as the informal, and noisy linguistic style, remain challenging to many natural language processing (NLP) tasks. This study fulfils an assessment of existing language models in distinguishing the sentiment expressed in tweets by using a rich collection of 22 datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-29T21:05:28Z)
• Text Classification Using Label Names Only: A Language Model Self-Training Approach [80.63885282358204]
  Current text classification methods typically require a good number of human-labeled documents as training data. We show that our model achieves around 90% accuracy on four benchmark datasets including topic and sentiment classification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-14T17:06:41Z)
• Cooperative Bi-path Metric for Few-shot Learning [50.98891758059389]
  We make two contributions to investigate the few-shot classification problem. We report a simple and effective baseline trained on base classes in the way of traditional supervised learning. We propose a cooperative bi-path metric for classification, which leverages the correlations between base classes and novel classes to further improve the accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-10T11:28:52Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.