Characterizing and Understanding the Behavior of Quantized Models for Reliable Deployment

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2204.04220v1
• Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2022 11:19:16 GMT
• Title: Characterizing and Understanding the Behavior of Quantized Models for Reliable Deployment
• Authors: Qiang Hu, Yuejun Guo, Maxime Cordy, Xiaofei Xie, Wei Ma, Mike Papadakis, Yves Le Traon
• Abstract summary: Quantization-aware training can produce more stable models than standard, adversarial, and Mixup training. Disagreements often have closer top-1 and top-2 output probabilities, and $Margin$ is a better indicator than the other uncertainty metrics to distinguish disagreements. We opensource our code and models as a new benchmark for further studying the quantized models.
• Score: 32.01355605506855
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) have gained considerable attention in the past decades due to their astounding performance in different applications, such as natural language modeling, self-driving assistance, and source code understanding. With rapid exploration, more and more complex DNN architectures have been proposed along with huge pre-trained model parameters. The common way to use such DNN models in user-friendly devices (e.g., mobile phones) is to perform model compression before deployment. However, recent research has demonstrated that model compression, e.g., model quantization, yields accuracy degradation as well as outputs disagreements when tested on unseen data. Since the unseen data always include distribution shifts and often appear in the wild, the quality and reliability of quantized models are not ensured. In this paper, we conduct a comprehensive study to characterize and help users understand the behaviors of quantized models. Our study considers 4 datasets spanning from image to text, 8 DNN architectures including feed-forward neural networks and recurrent neural networks, and 42 shifted sets with both synthetic and natural distribution shifts. The results reveal that 1) data with distribution shifts happen more disagreements than without. 2) Quantization-aware training can produce more stable models than standard, adversarial, and Mixup training. 3) Disagreements often have closer top-1 and top-2 output probabilities, and $Margin$ is a better indicator than the other uncertainty metrics to distinguish disagreements. 4) Retraining with disagreements has limited efficiency in removing disagreements. We opensource our code and models as a new benchmark for further studying the quantized models.

Related papers

• A Systematic Approach to Robustness Modelling for Deep Convolutional Neural Networks [0.294944680995069]
  Recent work raises questions about the ability for even larger models to generalize to data outside of the controlled train and test sets. We provide a method that uses induced failures to model the probability of failure as a function of time. We examine the various trade-offs between cost, robustness, latency, and reliability to find that larger models do not significantly aid in adversarial robustness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-24T19:12:37Z)
• Neural Additive Models for Location Scale and Shape: A Framework for Interpretable Neural Regression Beyond the Mean [1.0923877073891446]
  Deep neural networks (DNNs) have proven to be highly effective in a variety of tasks. Despite this success, the inner workings of DNNs are often not transparent. This lack of interpretability has led to increased research on inherently interpretable neural networks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-27T17:06:13Z)
• A Tale of Two Cities: Data and Configuration Variances in Robust Deep Learning [27.498927971861068]
  Deep neural networks (DNNs) are widely used in many industries such as image recognition, supply chain, medical diagnosis, and autonomous driving. Prior work has shown the high accuracy of a DNN model does not imply high robustness because the input data and external environment are constantly changing.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-18T03:32:53Z)
• Two-stage Modeling for Prediction with Confidence [0.0]
  It is difficult to generalize the performance of neural networks under the condition of distributional shift. We propose a novel two-stage model for the potential distribution shift problem. We show that our model offers reliable predictions for the vast majority of datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-19T08:48:07Z)
• Part-Based Models Improve Adversarial Robustness [57.699029966800644]
  We show that combining human prior knowledge with end-to-end learning can improve the robustness of deep neural networks. Our model combines a part segmentation model with a tiny classifier and is trained end-to-end to simultaneously segment objects into parts. Our experiments indicate that these models also reduce texture bias and yield better robustness against common corruptions and spurious correlations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-15T15:41:47Z)
• Investigating the Relationship Between Dropout Regularization and Model Complexity in Neural Networks [0.0]
  Dropout Regularization serves to reduce variance in Deep Learning models. We explore the relationship between the dropout rate and model complexity by training 2,000 neural networks. We build neural networks that predict the optimal dropout rate given the number of hidden units in each dense layer.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-14T23:49:33Z)
• Closed-form Continuous-Depth Models [99.40335716948101]
  Continuous-depth neural models rely on advanced numerical differential equation solvers. We present a new family of models, termed Closed-form Continuous-depth (CfC) networks, that are simple to describe and at least one order of magnitude faster.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-25T22:08:51Z)
• ANNETTE: Accurate Neural Network Execution Time Estimation with Stacked Models [56.21470608621633]
  We propose a time estimation framework to decouple the architectural search from the target hardware. The proposed methodology extracts a set of models from micro- kernel and multi-layer benchmarks and generates a stacked model for mapping and network execution time estimation. We compare estimation accuracy and fidelity of the generated mixed models, statistical models with the roofline model, and a refined roofline model for evaluation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-07T11:39:05Z)
• Neural Additive Models: Interpretable Machine Learning with Neural Nets [77.66871378302774]
  Deep neural networks (DNNs) are powerful black-box predictors that have achieved impressive performance on a wide variety of tasks. We propose Neural Additive Models (NAMs) which combine some of the expressivity of DNNs with the inherent intelligibility of generalized additive models. NAMs learn a linear combination of neural networks that each attend to a single input feature.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-29T01:28:32Z)
• Diversity inducing Information Bottleneck in Model Ensembles [73.80615604822435]
  In this paper, we target the problem of generating effective ensembles of neural networks by encouraging diversity in prediction. We explicitly optimize a diversity inducing adversarial loss for learning latent variables and thereby obtain diversity in the output predictions necessary for modeling multi-modal data. Compared to the most competitive baselines, we show significant improvements in classification accuracy, under a shift in the data distribution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-10T03:10:41Z)
• AvgOut: A Simple Output-Probability Measure to Eliminate Dull Responses [97.50616524350123]
  We build dialogue models that are dynamically aware of what utterances or tokens are dull without any feature-engineering. The first model, MinAvgOut, directly maximizes the diversity score through the output distributions of each batch. The second model, Label Fine-Tuning (LFT), prepends to the source sequence a label continuously scaled by the diversity score to control the diversity level. The third model, RL, adopts Reinforcement Learning and treats the diversity score as a reward signal.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-15T18:32:06Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.