A Survey on Sentence Embedding Models Performance for Patent Analysis

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2206.02690v3
• Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2022 14:38:44 GMT
• Title: A Survey on Sentence Embedding Models Performance for Patent Analysis
• Authors: Hamid Bekamiri, Daniel S. Hain, Roman Jurowetzki
• Abstract summary: We propose a standard library and dataset for assessing the accuracy of embeddings models based on PatentSBERTa approach. Results show PatentSBERTa, Bert-for-patents, and TF-IDF Weighted Word Embeddings have the best accuracy for computing sentence embeddings at the subclass level.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Patent data is an important source of knowledge for innovation research, while the technological similarity between pairs of patents is a key enabling indicator for patent analysis. Recently researchers have been using patent vector space models based on different NLP embeddings models to calculate the technological similarity between pairs of patents to help better understand innovations, patent landscaping, technology mapping, and patent quality evaluation. More often than not, Text Embedding is a vital precursor to patent analysis tasks. A pertinent question then arises: How should we measure and evaluate the accuracy of these embeddings? To the best of our knowledge, there is no comprehensive survey that builds a clear delineation of embedding models' performance for calculating patent similarity indicators. Therefore, in this study, we provide an overview of the accuracy of these algorithms based on patent classification performance and propose a standard library and dataset for assessing the accuracy of embeddings models based on PatentSBERTa approach. In a detailed discussion, we report the performance of the top 3 algorithms at section, class, and subclass levels. The results based on the first claim of patents show that PatentSBERTa, Bert-for-patents, and TF-IDF Weighted Word Embeddings have the best accuracy for computing sentence embeddings at the subclass level. According to the first results, the performance of the models in different classes varies, which shows researchers in patent analysis can utilize the results of this study to choose the best proper model based on the specific section of patent data they used.

Related papers

• ClaimBrush: A Novel Framework for Automated Patent Claim Refinement Based on Large Language Models [3.3427063846107825]
  ClaimBrush is a novel framework for automated patent claim refinement that includes a dataset and a rewriting model. We constructed a dataset for training and evaluating patent claim rewriting models by collecting a large number of actual patent claim rewriting cases. Our proposed rewriting model outperformed baselines and zero-shot learning in state-of-the-art large language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-08T00:20:54Z)
• A comparative analysis of embedding models for patent similarity [0.0]
  This paper makes two contributions to the field of text-based patent similarity. It compares the performance of different kinds of patent-specific pretrained embedding models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-25T11:20:23Z)
• PaECTER: Patent-level Representation Learning using Citation-informed Transformers [0.16785092703248325]
  PaECTER is a publicly available, open-source document-level encoder specific for patents. We fine-tune BERT for Patents with examiner-added citation information to generate numerical representations for patent documents. PaECTER performs better in similarity tasks than current state-of-the-art models used in the patent domain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-29T18:09:03Z)
• Unveiling Black-boxes: Explainable Deep Learning Models for Patent Classification [48.5140223214582]
  State-of-the-art methods for multi-label patent classification rely on deep opaque neural networks (DNNs) We propose a novel deep explainable patent classification framework by introducing layer-wise relevance propagation (LRP) Considering the relevance score, we then generate explanations by visualizing relevant words for the predicted patent class.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-31T14:11:37Z)
• The Languini Kitchen: Enabling Language Modelling Research at Different Scales of Compute [66.84421705029624]
  We introduce an experimental protocol that enables model comparisons based on equivalent compute, measured in accelerator hours. We pre-process an existing large, diverse, and high-quality dataset of books that surpasses existing academic benchmarks in quality, diversity, and document length. This work also provides two baseline models: a feed-forward model derived from the GPT-2 architecture and a recurrent model in the form of a novel LSTM with ten-fold throughput.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-20T10:31:17Z)
• MACE: An Efficient Model-Agnostic Framework for Counterfactual Explanation [132.77005365032468]
  We propose a novel framework of Model-Agnostic Counterfactual Explanation (MACE) In our MACE approach, we propose a novel RL-based method for finding good counterfactual examples and a gradient-less descent method for improving proximity. Experiments on public datasets validate the effectiveness with better validity, sparsity and proximity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-31T04:57:06Z)
• Automated Single-Label Patent Classification using Ensemble Classifiers [0.0]
  We present an innovative method of ensemble classifiers trained with different parts of the patent document. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time that an ensemble method was proposed for the patent classification problem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-03T08:47:15Z)
• Hybrid Model for Patent Classification using Augmented SBERT and KNN [0.0]
  This study aims to provide a hybrid approach for patent claim classification with Sentence-BERT (SBERT) and K Nearest Neighbours (KNN) The proposed framework predicts individual input patent class and subclass based on finding top k semantic similarity patents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-22T15:23:19Z)
• Few-Shot Named Entity Recognition: A Comprehensive Study [92.40991050806544]
  We investigate three schemes to improve the model generalization ability for few-shot settings. We perform empirical comparisons on 10 public NER datasets with various proportions of labeled data. We create new state-of-the-art results on both few-shot and training-free settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-29T23:43:16Z)
• Uncertainty-Aware Few-Shot Image Classification [118.72423376789062]
  Few-shot image classification learns to recognize new categories from limited labelled data. We propose Uncertainty-Aware Few-Shot framework for image classification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-09T12:26:27Z)
• A Diagnostic Study of Explainability Techniques for Text Classification [52.879658637466605]
  We develop a list of diagnostic properties for evaluating existing explainability techniques. We compare the saliency scores assigned by the explainability techniques with human annotations of salient input regions to find relations between a model's performance and the agreement of its rationales with human ones.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-25T12:01:53Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.