Norm Participation Grounds Language

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2206.02885v2
• Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2022 19:31:47 GMT
• Title: Norm Participation Grounds Language
• Authors: David Schlangen
• Abstract summary: I propose a different, and more wide-ranging conception of how grounding should be understood: What grounds language is its normative nature. There are standards for doing things right, these standards are public and authoritative, while at the same time acceptance of authority can be disputed and negotiated. What grounds language, then, is the determined use that language users make of it, and what it is grounded in is the community of language users.
• Score: 16.726800816202033
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The striking recent advances in eliciting seemingly meaningful language behaviour from language-only machine learning models have only made more apparent, through the surfacing of clear limitations, the need to go beyond the language-only mode and to ground these models "in the world". Proposals for doing so vary in the details, but what unites them is that the solution is sought in the addition of non-linguistic data types such as images or video streams, while largely keeping the mode of learning constant. I propose a different, and more wide-ranging conception of how grounding should be understood: What grounds language is its normative nature. There are standards for doing things right, these standards are public and authoritative, while at the same time acceptance of authority can and must be disputed and negotiated, in interactions in which only bearers of normative status can rightfully participate. What grounds language, then, is the determined use that language users make of it, and what it is grounded in is the community of language users. I sketch this idea, and draw some conclusions for work on computational modelling of meaningful language use.

Related papers

• Standard Language Ideology in AI-Generated Language [1.2815904071470705]
  We explore standard language ideology in language generated by large language models (LLMs) We introduce the concept of standard AI-generated language ideology, the process by which AI-generated language regards Standard American English (SAE) as a linguistic default and reinforces a linguistic bias that SAE is the most "appropriate" language.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-13T01:08:40Z)
• Visually Grounded Language Learning: a review of language games, datasets, tasks, and models [60.2604624857992]
  Many Vision+Language (V+L) tasks have been defined with the aim of creating models that can ground symbols in the visual modality. In this work, we provide a systematic literature review of several tasks and models proposed in the V+L field.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-05T02:17:29Z)
• Language Models as Inductive Reasoners [125.99461874008703]
  We propose a new paradigm (task) for inductive reasoning, which is to induce natural language rules from natural language facts. We create a dataset termed DEER containing 1.2k rule-fact pairs for the task, where rules and facts are written in natural language. We provide the first and comprehensive analysis of how well pretrained language models can induce natural language rules from natural language facts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-21T11:12:14Z)
• Transparency Helps Reveal When Language Models Learn Meaning [71.96920839263457]
  Our systematic experiments with synthetic data reveal that, with languages where all expressions have context-independent denotations, both autoregressive and masked language models learn to emulate semantic relations between expressions. Turning to natural language, our experiments with a specific phenomenon -- referential opacity -- add to the growing body of evidence that current language models do not well-represent natural language semantics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-14T02:35:19Z)
• Do As I Can, Not As I Say: Grounding Language in Robotic Affordances [119.29555551279155]
  Large language models can encode a wealth of semantic knowledge about the world. Such knowledge could be extremely useful to robots aiming to act upon high-level, temporally extended instructions expressed in natural language. We show how low-level skills can be combined with large language models so that the language model provides high-level knowledge about the procedures for performing complex and temporally-extended instructions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-04T17:57:11Z)
• Towards Zero-shot Language Modeling [90.80124496312274]
  We construct a neural model that is inductively biased towards learning human languages. We infer this distribution from a sample of typologically diverse training languages. We harness additional language-specific side information as distant supervision for held-out languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-06T23:49:18Z)
• Cross-lingual hate speech detection based on multilingual domain-specific word embeddings [4.769747792846004]
  We propose to address the problem of multilingual hate speech detection from the perspective of transfer learning. Our goal is to determine if knowledge from one particular language can be used to classify other language. We show that the use of our simple yet specific multilingual hate representations improves classification results.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-30T02:24:50Z)
• Provable Limitations of Acquiring Meaning from Ungrounded Form: What will Future Language Models Understand? [87.20342701232869]
  We investigate the abilities of ungrounded systems to acquire meaning. We study whether assertions enable a system to emulate representations preserving semantic relations like equivalence. We find that assertions enable semantic emulation if all expressions in the language are referentially transparent. However, if the language uses non-transparent patterns like variable binding, we show that emulation can become an uncomputable problem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-22T01:00:17Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.