An Ontological Approach to Analysing Social Service Provisioning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2206.11061v1
• Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2022 12:29:12 GMT
• Title: An Ontological Approach to Analysing Social Service Provisioning
• Authors: Mark S. Fox and Bart Gajderowicz and Daniela Rosu and Alina Turner and Lester Lyu
• Abstract summary: The paper first introduces key stakeholders, services, outcomes, events, needs and need satisfiers, along with their definitions. A subset of competency questions are presented to illustrate the types of questions key stakeholders have posed. Third, the extension's ability to answer questions is evaluated by presenting SPARQL queries executed on a Compass-based knowledge graph and analysing their results.
• Score: 5.386300535509189
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: This paper introduces ontological concepts required to evaluate and manage the coverage of social services in a Smart City context. Here, we focus on the perspective of key stakeholders, namely social purpose organizations and the clients they serve. The Compass ontology presented here extends the Common Impact Data Standard by introducing new concepts related to key dimensions: the who (Stakeholder), the what (Need, Need Satisfier, Outcome), the how (Service, Event), and the contributions (tracking resources). The paper first introduces key stakeholders, services, outcomes, events, needs and need satisfiers, along with their definitions. Second, a subset of competency questions are presented to illustrate the types of questions key stakeholders have posed. Third, the extension's ability to answer questions is evaluated by presenting SPARQL queries executed on a Compass-based knowledge graph and analysing their results.

Related papers

• On the Element-Wise Representation and Reasoning in Zero-Shot Image Recognition: A Systematic Survey [82.49623756124357]
  Zero-shot image recognition (ZSIR) aims at empowering models to recognize and reason in unseen domains. This paper presents a broad review of recent advances in element-wise ZSIR. We first attempt to integrate the three basic ZSIR tasks of object recognition, compositional recognition, and foundation model-based open-world recognition into a unified element-wise perspective.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-09T05:49:21Z)
• Service Level Agreements and Security SLA: A Comprehensive Survey [51.000851088730684]
  This survey paper identifies state of the art covering concepts, approaches, and open problems of SLA management. It contributes by carrying out a comprehensive review and covering the gap between the analyses proposed in existing surveys and the most recent literature on this topic. It proposes a novel classification criterium to organize the analysis based on SLA life cycle phases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-31T12:33:41Z)
• DeSIQ: Towards an Unbiased, Challenging Benchmark for Social Intelligence Understanding [60.84356161106069]
  We study the soundness of Social-IQ, a dataset of multiple-choice questions on videos of complex social interactions. Our analysis reveals that Social-IQ contains substantial biases, which can be exploited by a moderately strong language model. We introduce DeSIQ, a new challenging dataset, constructed by applying simple perturbations to Social-IQ.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-24T06:21:34Z)
• The Sentiment Problem: A Critical Survey towards Deconstructing Sentiment Analysis [9.379013474854776]
  We investigate the sociotechnical aspects of sentiment analysis (SA) by critically examining 189 peer-reviewed papers on their applications, models, and datasets. By delving into sociological and technological literature on sentiment, we unveil distinct conceptualizations of this term in domains such as finance, government, and medicine. Our study exposes a lack of explicit definitions and frameworks for characterizing sentiment, resulting in potential challenges and biases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-18T20:42:44Z)
• Supporting the Task-driven Skill Identification in Open Source Project Issue Tracking Systems [0.0]
  We investigate the automatic labeling of open issues strategy to help the contributors to pick a task to contribute. By identifying the skills, we claim the contributor candidates should pick a task more suitable. We applied quantitative studies to analyze the relevance of the labels in an experiment and compare the strategies' relative importance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-02T14:17:22Z)
• Extracting Impact Model Narratives from Social Services' Text [6.61319085872973]
  This paper proposes an architecture for named entity recognition (NER) on a corpus about social purpose organizations. We show how this approach can be used for the sequencing of services and impacted clients with information extracted from unstructured text. We evaluate the model on a corpus of social service descriptions with empirically calculated score.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-04T19:01:49Z)
• Semantic Categorization of Social Knowledge for Commonsense Question Answering [13.343786884695323]
  We propose to categorize the semantics needed for commonsense question answering tasks using the SocialIQA as an example. Unlike previous work, we observe our models with semantic categorizations of social knowledge can achieve comparable performance with a relatively simple model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-11T02:56:14Z)
• Beyond Expertise and Roles: A Framework to Characterize the Stakeholders of Interpretable Machine Learning and their Needs [6.381046244250263]
  It is critical that diverse stakeholders can interrogate black-box automated systems and find information that is understandable, relevant, and useful to them. This paper eschews prior expertise- and role-based categorizations of interpretability stakeholders in favor of a more granular framework. We characterize stakeholders by their formal, instrumental, and personal knowledge and how it manifests in the contexts of machine learning, the data domain, and the general milieu.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-24T23:21:21Z)
• What Makes a Good Summary? Reconsidering the Focus of Automatic Summarization [49.600619575148706]
  We find that the current focus of the field does not fully align with participants' wishes. Based on our findings, we argue that it is important to adopt a broader perspective on automatic summarization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-14T15:12:35Z)
• A Survey on Complex Question Answering over Knowledge Base: Recent Advances and Challenges [71.4531144086568]
  Question Answering (QA) over Knowledge Base (KB) aims to automatically answer natural language questions. Researchers have shifted their attention from simple questions to complex questions, which require more KB triples and constraint inference.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-26T07:13:32Z)
• Survey on Visual Sentiment Analysis [87.20223213370004]
  This paper reviews pertinent publications and tries to present an exhaustive overview of the field of Visual Sentiment Analysis. The paper also describes principles of design of general Visual Sentiment Analysis systems from three main points of view. A formalization of the problem is discussed, considering different levels of granularity, as well as the components that can affect the sentiment toward an image in different ways.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-24T10:15:22Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.