Is there an Ethical Operational Research?
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2207.01502v1
- Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2022 18:29:04 GMT
- Title: Is there an Ethical Operational Research?
- Authors: Odile Bellenguez, Nadia Brauner, Alexis Tsouki\`as
- Abstract summary: The paper addresses the question of whether there exists an "Ethical Operational Research"
It identifies the ethical questions which are specific to our professional community and suggests research topics which, although independently developed, are relevant for handling such questions.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: The ethical dimension of Operational Research and Decision Aiding, although
not a new subject, turns to be a concern, both for the large public and the OR
community, because of the wide spread of autonomous artefacts endowed with
decision capacity thanks to the use of models, methods and tools developed
within our field. The paper addresses the question of whether there exists an
"Ethical Operational Research", identifies the ethical questions which are
specific to our professional community and suggests research topics which,
although independently developed, are relevant for handling such questions.
Related papers
- Exploring and steering the moral compass of Large Language Models [55.2480439325792]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have become central to advancing automation and decision-making across various sectors.
This study proposes a comprehensive comparative analysis of the most advanced LLMs to assess their moral profiles.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-27T16:49:22Z) - Responsible AI Considerations in Text Summarization Research: A Review
of Current Practices [89.85174013619883]
We focus on text summarization, a common NLP task largely overlooked by the responsible AI community.
We conduct a multi-round qualitative analysis of 333 summarization papers from the ACL Anthology published between 2020-2022.
We focus on how, which, and when responsible AI issues are covered, which relevant stakeholders are considered, and mismatches between stated and realized research goals.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-18T15:35:36Z) - Ethics in conversation: Building an ethics assurance case for autonomous
AI-enabled voice agents in healthcare [1.8964739087256175]
The principles-based ethics assurance argument pattern is one proposal in the AI ethics landscape.
This paper presents the interim findings of a case study applying this ethics assurance framework to the use of Dora, an AI-based telemedicine system.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-23T16:04:59Z) - Human-Centered Responsible Artificial Intelligence: Current & Future
Trends [76.94037394832931]
In recent years, the CHI community has seen significant growth in research on Human-Centered Responsible Artificial Intelligence.
All of this work is aimed at developing AI that benefits humanity while being grounded in human rights and ethics, and reducing the potential harms of AI.
In this special interest group, we aim to bring together researchers from academia and industry interested in these topics to map current and future research trends.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-02-16T08:59:42Z) - Fairness in Recommender Systems: Research Landscape and Future
Directions [119.67643184567623]
We review the concepts and notions of fairness that were put forward in the area in the recent past.
We present an overview of how research in this field is currently operationalized.
Overall, our analysis of recent works points to certain research gaps.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-05-23T08:34:25Z) - Metaethical Perspectives on 'Benchmarking' AI Ethics [81.65697003067841]
Benchmarks are seen as the cornerstone for measuring technical progress in Artificial Intelligence (AI) research.
An increasingly prominent research area in AI is ethics, which currently has no set of benchmarks nor commonly accepted way for measuring the 'ethicality' of an AI system.
We argue that it makes more sense to talk about 'values' rather than 'ethics' when considering the possible actions of present and future AI systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-04-11T14:36:39Z) - An Ecosystem Approach to Ethical AI and Data Use: Experimental
Reflections [0.0]
This paper offers a methodology to identify the needs of AI practitioners when it comes to confronting and resolving ethical challenges.
We offer a grassroots approach to operational ethics based on dialog and mutualised responsibility.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-12-27T07:41:26Z) - Indecision Modeling [50.00689136829134]
It is important that AI systems act in ways which align with human values.
People are often indecisive, and especially so when their decision has moral implications.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-12-15T18:32:37Z) - Social Responsibility of Algorithms [0.0]
The paper makes a short overview of the scientific investigation around this topic, showing that the development, existence and use of such autonomous artifacts is much older than the recent interest in machine learning monopolised artificial intelligence.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-12-06T16:46:14Z) - Give Me Convenience and Give Her Death: Who Should Decide What Uses of
NLP are Appropriate, and on What Basis? [40.75458460149429]
We discuss whether datasets and tasks should be deemed off-limits for NLP research.
We focus in particular on the role of data statements in ethically assessing research.
We examine the outcomes of similar debates in other scientific disciplines.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-05-27T07:31:57Z) - Implementing AI Ethics in Practice: An Empirical Evaluation of the
RESOLVEDD Strategy [6.7298812735467095]
We empirically evaluate an existing method from the field of business ethics, the RESOLVEDD strategy, in the context of ethical system development.
One of our key findings is that, even though the use of the ethical method was forced upon the participants, its utilization nonetheless facilitated of ethical consideration in the projects.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-04-21T17:58:53Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.