Team Learning as a Lens for Designing Human-AI Co-Creative Systems

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2207.02996v1
• Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2022 22:11:13 GMT
• Title: Team Learning as a Lens for Designing Human-AI Co-Creative Systems
• Authors: Frederic Gmeiner, Kenneth Holstein, Nikolas Martelaro
• Abstract summary: Generative, ML-driven interactive systems have the potential to change how people interact with computers in creative processes. It is still unclear how we might achieve effective human-AI collaboration in open-ended task domains.
• Score: 12.24664973838839
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Generative, ML-driven interactive systems have the potential to change how people interact with computers in creative processes - turning tools into co-creators. However, it is still unclear how we might achieve effective human-AI collaboration in open-ended task domains. There are several known challenges around communication in the interaction with ML-driven systems. An overlooked aspect in the design of co-creative systems is how users can be better supported in learning to collaborate with such systems. Here we reframe human-AI collaboration as a learning problem: Inspired by research on team learning, we hypothesize that similar learning strategies that apply to human-human teams might also increase the collaboration effectiveness and quality of humans working with co-creative generative systems. In this position paper, we aim to promote team learning as a lens for designing more effective co-creative human-AI collaboration and emphasize collaboration process quality as a goal for co-creative systems. Furthermore, we outline a preliminary schematic framework for embedding team learning support in co-creative AI systems. We conclude by proposing a research agenda and posing open questions for further study on supporting people in learning to collaborate with generative AI systems.

Related papers

• Beyond Following: Mixing Active Initiative into Computational Creativity [7.366868731714772]
  This study investigates the influence of an active and learning AI agent on creators' expectancy of creative responsibilities. We develop a Multi-armed-bandit agent that learns from the human creator, updates its collaborative decision-making belief, and switches between its capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-06T18:56:08Z)
• Building Machines that Learn and Think with People [72.40300991089445]
  We show how the science of collaborative cognition can be put to work to engineer systems that really can be called thought partners'' We lay out several modes of collaborative thought in which humans and AI thought partners can engage and propose desiderata for human-compatible thought partnerships.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-22T02:42:45Z)
• Grasping AI: experiential exercises for designers [8.95562850825636]
  We investigate techniques for exploring and reflecting on the interactional affordances, the unique relational possibilities, and the wider social implications of AI systems. We find that exercises around metaphors and enactments make questions of training and learning, privacy and consent, autonomy and agency more tangible.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-02T15:34:08Z)
• Human Decision Makings on Curriculum Reinforcement Learning with Difficulty Adjustment [52.07473934146584]
  We guide the curriculum reinforcement learning results towards a preferred performance level that is neither too hard nor too easy via learning from the human decision process. Our system is highly parallelizable, making it possible for a human to train large-scale reinforcement learning applications. It shows reinforcement learning performance can successfully adjust in sync with the human desired difficulty level.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-04T23:53:51Z)
• Understanding User Perceptions, Collaborative Experience and User Engagement in Different Human-AI Interaction Designs for Co-Creative Systems [0.7614628596146599]
  Human-AI co-creativity involves humans and AI collaborating on a shared creative product as partners. In many existing co-creative systems users can communicate with the AI, usually using buttons or sliders. This paper presents a study with 38 participants to explore the impact of two interaction designs on user engagement, collaborative experience and user perception of a co-creative AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-27T22:37:44Z)
• Designing Creative AI Partners with COFI: A Framework for Modeling Interaction in Human-AI Co-Creative Systems [0.7614628596146599]
  There is relatively little research about interaction design in the co-creativity field. The primary focus of co-creativity research has been on the abilities of the AI. This paper focuses on the importance of interaction design in co-creative systems with the development of the Co-Creative Framework for Interaction design (COFI)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-15T22:35:23Z)
• Identifying Ethical Issues in AI Partners in Human-AI Co-Creation [0.7614628596146599]
  Human-AI co-creativity involves humans and AI collaborating on a shared creative product as partners. In many existing co-creative systems, users communicate with the AI using buttons or sliders. This paper explores the impact of AI-to-human communication on user perception and engagement in co-creative systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-15T20:41:54Z)
• Human-Centered AI for Data Science: A Systematic Approach [48.71756559152512]
  Human-Centered AI (HCAI) refers to the research effort that aims to design and implement AI techniques to support various human tasks. We illustrate how we approach HCAI using a series of research projects around Data Science (DS) works as a case study.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-03T21:47:13Z)
• Joint Mind Modeling for Explanation Generation in Complex Human-Robot Collaborative Tasks [83.37025218216888]
  We propose a novel explainable AI (XAI) framework for achieving human-like communication in human-robot collaborations. The robot builds a hierarchical mind model of the human user and generates explanations of its own mind as a form of communications. Results show that the generated explanations of our approach significantly improves the collaboration performance and user perception of the robot.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-24T23:35:03Z)
• Learning to Complement Humans [67.38348247794949]
  A rising vision for AI in the open world centers on the development of systems that can complement humans for perceptual, diagnostic, and reasoning tasks. We demonstrate how an end-to-end learning strategy can be harnessed to optimize the combined performance of human-machine teams.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-01T20:00:23Z)
• Distributed and Democratized Learning: Philosophy and Research Challenges [80.39805582015133]
  We propose a novel design philosophy called democratized learning (Dem-AI) Inspired by the societal groups of humans, the specialized groups of learning agents in the proposed Dem-AI system are self-organized in a hierarchical structure to collectively perform learning tasks more efficiently. We present a reference design as a guideline to realize future Dem-AI systems, inspired by various interdisciplinary fields.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-18T08:45:10Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.