Quality analysis for precision metrology based on joint weak measurements without discarding readout data

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2207.03668v5
• Date: Tue, 30 May 2023 10:26:11 GMT
• Title: Quality analysis for precision metrology based on joint weak measurements without discarding readout data
• Authors: Lupei Qin, Luting Xu and Xin-Qi Li
• Abstract summary: In general, the metrological precision of the JWM scheme cannot reach that indicated by the total FI, despite that all the readouts are collected without discarding. We also analyze the effect of technical noise, showing that the technical noise cannot be removed by the subtracting procedure.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: We present a theoretical analysis for the metrology quality of joint weak measurements (JWM), in close comparison with the weak-value-amplification (WVA) technique. We point out that the difference probability function employed in the JWM scheme cannot be used to calculate the uncertainty variance and Fisher information (FI). In order to carry out the metrological precision, we reformulate the problem in terms of difference-combined stochastic variables, which makes all calculations well defined. We reveal that, in general, the metrological precision of the JWM scheme cannot reach that indicated by the total FI, despite that all the readouts are collected without discarding. We also analyze the effect of technical noise, showing that the technical noise cannot be removed by the subtracting procedure, which yet can be utilized to outperform the conventional measurement, when considering the imaginary WV measurement.

Related papers

• A General Framework for Uncertainty Quantification via Neural SDE-RNN [0.3314882635954751]
  Uncertainty quantification is a critical yet unsolved challenge for deep learning. We propose a novel framework based on the principles of recurrent neural networks and neural differential equations for reconciling irregularly sampled measurements. Our experiments on the IEEE 37 bus test system reveal that our framework can outperform state-of-the-art uncertainty quantification approaches for time-series data imputations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-01T22:59:45Z)
• Non-Parametric Learning of Stochastic Differential Equations with Non-asymptotic Fast Rates of Convergence [65.63201894457404]
  We propose a novel non-parametric learning paradigm for the identification of drift and diffusion coefficients of non-linear differential equations. The key idea essentially consists of fitting a RKHS-based approximation of the corresponding Fokker-Planck equation to such observations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-24T20:43:47Z)
• Learning the Distribution of Errors in Stereo Matching for Joint Disparity and Uncertainty Estimation [8.057006406834466]
  We present a new loss function for joint disparity and uncertainty estimation in deep stereo matching. We experimentally assess the effectiveness of our approach and observe significant improvements in both disparity and uncertainty prediction on large datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-31T21:58:19Z)
• Monotonicity and Double Descent in Uncertainty Estimation with Gaussian Processes [52.92110730286403]
  It is commonly believed that the marginal likelihood should be reminiscent of cross-validation metrics and that both should deteriorate with larger input dimensions. We prove that by tuning hyper parameters, the performance, as measured by the marginal likelihood, improves monotonically with the input dimension. We also prove that cross-validation metrics exhibit qualitatively different behavior that is characteristic of double descent.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-14T08:09:33Z)
• Better Uncertainty Quantification for Machine Translation Evaluation [17.36759906285316]
  We train the COMET metric with new heteroscedastic regression, divergence minimization, and direct uncertainty prediction objectives. Experiments show improved results on WMT20 and WMT21 metrics task datasets and a substantial reduction in computational costs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-13T17:49:25Z)
• Non-Linear Spectral Dimensionality Reduction Under Uncertainty [107.01839211235583]
  We propose a new dimensionality reduction framework, called NGEU, which leverages uncertainty information and directly extends several traditional approaches. We show that the proposed NGEU formulation exhibits a global closed-form solution, and we analyze, based on the Rademacher complexity, how the underlying uncertainties theoretically affect the generalization ability of the framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-09T19:01:33Z)
• Differentiable Annealed Importance Sampling and the Perils of Gradient Noise [68.44523807580438]
  Annealed importance sampling (AIS) and related algorithms are highly effective tools for marginal likelihood estimation. Differentiability is a desirable property as it would admit the possibility of optimizing marginal likelihood as an objective. We propose a differentiable algorithm by abandoning Metropolis-Hastings steps, which further unlocks mini-batch computation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-21T17:10:14Z)
• A Consistency-Based Loss for Deep Odometry Through Uncertainty Propagation [0.3359875577705538]
  The uncertainty over each output can be derived to weigh the different loss terms in a maximum likelihood setting. In this paper, we associate uncertainties with the output poses of a deep odometry network and propagate the uncertainties through each iteration. We provide quantitative and qualitative analysis of pose estimates and show that our method surpasses the accuracy of the state-of-the-art Visual Odometry approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-01T11:09:20Z)
• Bayesian Uncertainty Estimation of Learned Variational MRI Reconstruction [63.202627467245584]
  We introduce a Bayesian variational framework to quantify the model-immanent (epistemic) uncertainty. We demonstrate that our approach yields competitive results for undersampled MRI reconstruction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-12T18:08:14Z)
• Verification of joint measurability using phase-space quasiprobability distributions [0.0]
  We introduce an approach to verify the joint measurability of measurements based on phase-space quasiprobability distributions. Our results establish a connection between two notions of non-classicality, namely the negativity of quasiprobability distributions and measurement incompatibility.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-12T16:21:36Z)
• Learning to Predict Error for MRI Reconstruction [67.76632988696943]
  We demonstrate that predictive uncertainty estimated by the current methods does not highly correlate with prediction error. We propose a novel method that estimates the target labels and magnitude of the prediction error in two steps.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-13T15:55:32Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.