A No-Code Low-Code Paradigm for Authoring Business Automations Using
Natural Language
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2207.10648v1
- Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2022 19:17:55 GMT
- Title: A No-Code Low-Code Paradigm for Authoring Business Automations Using
Natural Language
- Authors: Michael Desmond, Evelyn Duesterwald, Vatche Isahagian, Vinod Muthusamy
- Abstract summary: We propose a paradigm for the construction of business automations using natural language.
The approach applies a large language model to translate business rules and automations described in natural language.
- Score: 9.03354980024123
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Most business process automation is still developed using traditional
automation technologies such as workflow engines. These systems provide domain
specific languages that require both business knowledge and programming skills
to effectively use. As such, business users often lack adequate programming
skills to fully leverage these code oriented environments. We propose a
paradigm for the construction of business automations using natural language.
The approach applies a large language model to translate business rules and
automations described in natural language, into a domain specific language
interpretable by a business rule engine. We compare the performance of various
language model configurations, across various target domains, and explore the
use of constrained decoding to ensure syntactically correct generation of
output.
Related papers
- The Ann Arbor Architecture for Agent-Oriented Programming [6.630761601310476]
We argue that language models function as automata and, like all automata, should be programmed in the languages they accept.
We introduce the Ann Arbor Architecture, a conceptual framework for agent-oriented programming of language models.
We present the design of our agent platform Postline, and report on our initial experiments in agent training.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-14T04:21:36Z) - From Words to Workflows: Automating Business Processes [0.2796197251957245]
The limitations of Robotic Process Automation (RPA) have become apparent.
Recent advancements in Artificial Intelligence (AI) have paved the way for Intelligent Automation (IA)
This paper introduces Text2Workflow, a novel method that automatically generates from natural language user requests.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-04T16:34:35Z) - CodeGRAG: Bridging the Gap between Natural Language and Programming Language via Graphical Retrieval Augmented Generation [58.84212778960507]
We propose CodeGRAG, a Graphical Retrieval Augmented Code Generation framework to enhance the performance of LLMs.
CodeGRAG builds the graphical view of code blocks based on the control flow and data flow of them to fill the gap between programming languages and natural language.
Various experiments and ablations are done on four datasets including both the C++ and python languages to validate the hard meta-graph prompt, the soft prompting technique, and the effectiveness of the objectives for pretrained GNN expert.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-03T02:48:55Z) - AutoGuide: Automated Generation and Selection of Context-Aware Guidelines for Large Language Model Agents [74.17623527375241]
We introduce a novel framework, called AutoGuide, which automatically generates context-aware guidelines from offline experiences.
As a result, our guidelines facilitate the provision of relevant knowledge for the agent's current decision-making process.
Our evaluation demonstrates that AutoGuide significantly outperforms competitive baselines in complex benchmark domains.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-13T22:06:03Z) - Domain-Specific Fine-Tuning of Large Language Models for Interactive Robot Programming [47.60440351442233]
We propose a natural language-based assistant for programming of advanced, industrial robotic applications.
We investigate strategies for domain-specific fine-tuning of foundation models with limited data and compute.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-21T14:51:04Z) - Dialogue-based generation of self-driving simulation scenarios using
Large Language Models [14.86435467709869]
Simulation is an invaluable tool for developing and evaluating controllers for self-driving cars.
Current simulation frameworks are driven by highly-specialist domain specific languages.
There is often a gap between a concise English utterance and the executable code that captures the user's intent.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-26T13:07:01Z) - Instruct2Act: Mapping Multi-modality Instructions to Robotic Actions
with Large Language Model [63.66204449776262]
Instruct2Act is a framework that maps multi-modal instructions to sequential actions for robotic manipulation tasks.
Our approach is adjustable and flexible in accommodating various instruction modalities and input types.
Our zero-shot method outperformed many state-of-the-art learning-based policies in several tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-18T17:59:49Z) - PADL: Language-Directed Physics-Based Character Control [66.517142635815]
We present PADL, which allows users to issue natural language commands for specifying high-level tasks and low-level skills that a character should perform.
We show that our framework can be applied to effectively direct a simulated humanoid character to perform a diverse array of complex motor skills.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-01-31T18:59:22Z) - Using Document Similarity Methods to create Parallel Datasets for Code
Translation [60.36392618065203]
Translating source code from one programming language to another is a critical, time-consuming task.
We propose to use document similarity methods to create noisy parallel datasets of code.
We show that these models perform comparably to models trained on ground truth for reasonable levels of noise.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-10-11T17:07:58Z) - Customizing Contextualized Language Models forLegal Document Reviews [0.22940141855172028]
We show how different language models strained on general-domain corpora can be best customized for legal document reviewing tasks.
We compare their efficiencies with respect to task performances and present practical considerations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-02-10T22:14:15Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.