Democratization of Quantum Technologies

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2208.03368v3
• Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2022 11:25:00 GMT
• Title: Democratization of Quantum Technologies
• Authors: Zeki C. Seskir, Steven Umbrello, Christopher Coenen, Pieter E. Vermaas
• Abstract summary: Democratization is mainly adopted by companies working on quantum computing and used in a very narrow understanding of the concept. We argue that more reflexivity and responsiveness regarding the narratives and actions adopted by the actors in the QT field, and making the underlying assumptions of ongoing efforts on democratization of QT explicit, can result in a better technology for society.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: As quantum technologies (QT) advance, their potential impact on and relation with society has been developing into an important issue for exploration. In this paper, we investigate the topic of democratization in the context of QT, particularly quantum computing. The paper contains three main sections. First, we briefly introduce different theories of democracy (participatory, representative, and deliberative) and how the concept of democratization can be formulated with respect to whether democracy is taken as an intrinsic or instrumental value. Second, we give an overview of how the concept of democratization is used in the QT field. Democratization is mainly adopted by companies working on quantum computing and used in a very narrow understanding of the concept. Third, we explore various narratives and counter-narratives concerning democratization in QT. Finally, we explore the general efforts of democratization in QT such as different forms of access, formation of grassroot communities and special interest groups, the emerging culture of manifesto writing, and how these can be located within the different theories of democracy. In conclusion, we argue that although the ongoing efforts in the democratization of QT are necessary steps towards the democratization of this set of emerging technologies, they should not be accepted as sufficient to argue that QT is a democratized field. We argue that more reflexivity and responsiveness regarding the narratives and actions adopted by the actors in the QT field, and making the underlying assumptions of ongoing efforts on democratization of QT explicit, can result in a better technology for society.

Related papers

• From Experts to the Public: Governing Multimodal Language Models in Politically Sensitive Video Analysis [48.14390493099495]
  This paper examines the governance of large language models (MM-LLMs) through individual and collective deliberation. We conducted a two-step study: first, interviews with 10 journalists established a baseline understanding of expert video interpretation; second, 114 individuals from the general public engaged in deliberation using Inclusive.AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-15T03:17:38Z)
• Prioritising Response-able IP Practices in Digitization of Electoral Processes in Africa [0.0]
  This paper explores the relationship between intellectual property (IP) practices and the adoption of digital technologies used in democratic electoral processes. Because of the hard boundaries associated with IP it creates an environment where the systems are controlled solely by technology IP owners. This questions the response-ability and trust-ability of digital technologies in running democratic processes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-07T11:07:09Z)
• Representation Bias in Political Sample Simulations with Large Language Models [54.48283690603358]
  This study seeks to identify and quantify biases in simulating political samples with Large Language Models. Using the GPT-3.5-Turbo model, we leverage data from the American National Election Studies, German Longitudinal Election Study, Zuobiao dataset, and China Family Panel Studies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-16T05:52:26Z)
• Understanding "Democratization" in NLP and ML Research [22.061018815342184]
  We find that democratization is most frequently used to convey (ease of) access to or use of technologies, without meaningfully engaging with theories of democratization. We call for researchers to enrich their use of the term democratization with appropriate theory, towards democratic technologies beyond superficial access.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-17T14:47:06Z)
• Navigating the Quantum Divide(s) [0.0]
  This article explores the possible divides resulting from the introduction of emerging quantum technologies (QT) to society. It provides the multidirectional impacts of QT on science, technology, geopolitics, and societal structures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-12T19:10:02Z)
• A Roadmap to Pluralistic Alignment [49.29107308098236]
  We propose a roadmap to pluralistic alignment, specifically using language models as a test bed. We identify and formalize three possible ways to define and operationalize pluralism in AI systems. We argue that current alignment techniques may be fundamentally limited for pluralistic AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-07T18:21:17Z)
• Enabling the Digital Democratic Revival: A Research Program for Digital Democracy [68.02254954746476]
  This white paper outlines a long-term scientific vision for the development of digital-democracy technology. It arose from the Lorentz Center Workshop on Algorithmic Technology for Democracy'' (Leiden, October 2022)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-30T10:12:49Z)
• Explanatory Publics: Explainability and Democratic Thought [0.0]
  I am gesturing to the need for frameworks of knowledge to be justified through a social right to explanation. For a polity to be considered democratic, it must ensure that its citizens are able to develop a capacity for explanatory thought. This is to extend the notion of a public sphere where citizens are able to question ideas, practices, and institutions in society more generally.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-04T20:25:13Z)
• Democratising AI: Multiple Meanings, Goals, and Methods [0.0]
  Numerous parties are calling for the democratisation of AI, but the phrase is used to refer to a variety of goals, the pursuit of which sometimes conflict. This paper identifies four kinds of AI democratisation that are commonly discussed. Main takeaway is that AI democratisation is a multifarious and sometimes conflicting concept.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-22T15:23:22Z)
• The Role of Large Language Models in the Recognition of Territorial Sovereignty: An Analysis of the Construction of Legitimacy [67.44950222243865]
  We argue that technology tools like Google Maps and Large Language Models (LLM) are often perceived as impartial and objective. We highlight the case of three controversial territories: Crimea, West Bank and Transnitria, by comparing the responses of ChatGPT against Wikipedia information and United Nations resolutions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-17T08:46:49Z)
• Factoring the Matrix of Domination: A Critical Review and Reimagination of Intersectionality in AI Fairness [55.037030060643126]
  Intersectionality is a critical framework that allows us to examine how social inequalities persist. We argue that adopting intersectionality as an analytical framework is pivotal to effectively operationalizing fairness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-16T21:02:09Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.