Understanding Interpersonal Conflict Types and their Impact on
Perception Classification
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2208.08758v1
- Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2022 10:39:35 GMT
- Title: Understanding Interpersonal Conflict Types and their Impact on
Perception Classification
- Authors: Charles Welch, Joan Plepi, B\'ela Neuendorf, Lucie Flek
- Abstract summary: We use a novel annotation scheme and release a new dataset of situations and conflict aspect annotations.
We then build a classifier to predict whether someone will perceive the actions of one individual as right or wrong in a given situation.
Our findings have important implications for understanding conflict and social norms.
- Score: 7.907976678407914
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Studies on interpersonal conflict have a long history and contain many
suggestions for conflict typology. We use this as the basis of a novel
annotation scheme and release a new dataset of situations and conflict aspect
annotations. We then build a classifier to predict whether someone will
perceive the actions of one individual as right or wrong in a given situation,
outperforming previous work on this task. Our analyses include conflict
aspects, but also generated clusters, which are human validated, and show
differences in conflict content based on the relationship of participants to
the author. Our findings have important implications for understanding conflict
and social norms.
Related papers
- GRASP: A Disagreement Analysis Framework to Assess Group Associations in Perspectives [18.574420136899978]
We propose GRASP, a comprehensive disagreement analysis framework to measure group association in perspectives among different rater sub-groups.
Our framework reveals specific rater groups that have significantly different perspectives than others on certain tasks, and helps identify demographic axes that are crucial to consider in specific task contexts.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-09T00:12:21Z) - Dimensions of Online Conflict: Towards Modeling Agonism [2.471304332463658]
Agonism plays a vital role in democratic dialogue by fostering diverse perspectives and robust discussions.
To model these two types of conflict, we collected Twitter conversations related to trending controversial topics.
We introduce a comprehensive annotation schema for labelling different dimensions of conflict in the conversations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-06T22:34:17Z) - Rehearsal: Simulating Conflict to Teach Conflict Resolution [54.32934135393982]
Rehearsal is a system that allows users to rehearse conflicts with a believable simulated interlocutor.
Users can utilize Rehearsal to practice handling a variety of predefined conflict scenarios.
Rehearsal uses IRP to generate utterances grounded in conflict resolution theory.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-21T17:59:20Z) - Active and Passive Causal Inference Learning [51.91564516458894]
This paper serves as a starting point for machine learning researchers, engineers and students who are interested in causal inference.
We start by laying out an important set of assumptions that are collectively needed for causal identification.
We build out a set of important causal inference techniques, which we do so by categorizing them into two buckets; active and passive approaches.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-18T02:23:48Z) - Getting Sick After Seeing a Doctor? Diagnosing and Mitigating Knowledge Conflicts in Event Temporal Reasoning [87.92209048521153]
Event temporal reasoning aims at identifying the temporal relations between two or more events from narratives.
Knowledge conflicts arise when there is a mismatch between the actual temporal relations of events in the context and the prior knowledge or biases learned by the model.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-24T10:04:06Z) - Fairness meets Cross-Domain Learning: a new perspective on Models and
Metrics [80.07271410743806]
We study the relationship between cross-domain learning (CD) and model fairness.
We introduce a benchmark on face and medical images spanning several demographic groups as well as classification and localization tasks.
Our study covers 14 CD approaches alongside three state-of-the-art fairness algorithms and shows how the former can outperform the latter.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-25T09:34:05Z) - Unifying Data Perspectivism and Personalization: An Application to
Social Norms [10.480094567764606]
We examine a corpus of social media posts about conflict from a set of 13k annotators and 210k judgements of social norms.
We apply personalization methods to the modeling of annotators and compare their effectiveness for predicting the perception of social norms.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-10-26T07:43:26Z) - Didn't see that coming: a survey on non-verbal social human behavior
forecasting [47.99589136455976]
Non-verbal social human behavior forecasting has increasingly attracted the interest of the research community in recent years.
Its direct applications to human-robot interaction and socially-aware human motion generation make it a very attractive field.
We define the behavior forecasting problem for multiple interactive agents in a generic way that aims at unifying the fields of social signals prediction and human motion forecasting.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-03-04T18:25:30Z) - Adversarial Attacks and Defenses: An Interpretation Perspective [80.23908920686625]
We review recent work on adversarial attacks and defenses, particularly from the perspective of machine learning interpretation.
The goal of model interpretation, or interpretable machine learning, is to extract human-understandable terms for the working mechanism of models.
For each type of interpretation, we elaborate on how it could be used for adversarial attacks and defenses.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-04-23T23:19:00Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.