Universal cost bound of quantum error mitigation based on quantum
estimation theory
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2208.09385v6
- Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2024 03:56:48 GMT
- Title: Universal cost bound of quantum error mitigation based on quantum
estimation theory
- Authors: Kento Tsubouchi, Takahiro Sagawa, and Nobuyuki Yoshioka
- Abstract summary: We present a unified approach to analyzing the cost of various quantum error mitigation methods on the basis of quantum estimation theory.
We derive for a generic layered quantum circuit under a wide class of Markovian noise that, unbiased estimation of an observable encounters an exponential growth with the circuit depth in the lower bound on the measurement cost.
Our results contribute to the understanding of the physical limitations of quantum error mitigation and offer a new criterion for evaluating the performance of quantum error mitigation techniques.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: We present a unified approach to analyzing the cost of various quantum error
mitigation methods on the basis of quantum estimation theory. By analyzing the
quantum Fisher information matrix of a virtual quantum circuit that effectively
represents the operations of quantum error mitigation methods, we derive for a
generic layered quantum circuit under a wide class of Markovian noise that,
unbiased estimation of an observable encounters an exponential growth with the
circuit depth in the lower bound on the measurement cost. Under the global
depolarizing noise, we in particular find that the bound can be asymptotically
saturated by merely rescaling the measurement results. Moreover, we prove for
random circuits with local noise that the cost grows exponentially also with
the qubit count. Our numerical simulations support the observation that, even
if the circuit has only linear connectivity, such as the brick-wall structure,
each noise channel converges to the global depolarizing channel with its
strength growing exponentially with the qubit count. This not only implies the
exponential growth of cost both with the depth and qubit count, but also
validates the rescaling technique for sufficiently deep quantum circuits. Our
results contribute to the understanding of the physical limitations of quantum
error mitigation and offer a new criterion for evaluating the performance of
quantum error mitigation techniques.
Related papers
- Power Characterization of Noisy Quantum Kernels [52.47151453259434]
We show that noise may make quantum kernel methods to only have poor prediction capability, even when the generalization error is small.
We provide a crucial warning to employ noisy quantum kernel methods for quantum computation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-31T01:02:16Z) - Robust Quantum Gates against Correlated Noise in Integrated Quantum Chips [11.364693110852738]
We report the experimental realization of robust quantum gates in superconducting quantum circuits.
Our work provides a versatile toolbox for achieving noise-resilient complex quantum circuits.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-03T16:12:35Z) - Increasing the Measured Effective Quantum Volume with Zero Noise Extrapolation [1.0037949839020766]
We show that ZNE can increase the effective quantum volume over the vendor-measured quantum volume.
Specifically, we measure the effective quantum volume of four IBM Quantum superconducting processor units.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-28T01:31:41Z) - Practical limitations of quantum data propagation on noisy quantum processors [0.9362259192191963]
We show that owing to the noisy nature of current quantum processors, such a quantum algorithm will require single- and two-qubit gates with very low error probability to produce reliable results.
Specifically, we provide the upper bounds on how the relative error in variational parameters' propagation scales with the probability of noise in quantum hardware.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-22T17:12:52Z) - Numerical Simulations of Noisy Quantum Circuits for Computational
Chemistry [51.827942608832025]
Near-term quantum computers can calculate the ground-state properties of small molecules.
We show how the structure of the computational ansatz as well as the errors induced by device noise affect the calculation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-12-31T16:33:10Z) - Circuit Symmetry Verification Mitigates Quantum-Domain Impairments [69.33243249411113]
We propose circuit-oriented symmetry verification that are capable of verifying the commutativity of quantum circuits without the knowledge of the quantum state.
In particular, we propose the Fourier-temporal stabilizer (STS) technique, which generalizes the conventional quantum-domain formalism to circuit-oriented stabilizers.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-12-27T21:15:35Z) - Direct Quantum Communications in the Presence of Realistic Noisy
Entanglement [69.25543534545538]
We propose a novel quantum communication scheme relying on realistic noisy pre-shared entanglement.
Our performance analysis shows that the proposed scheme offers competitive QBER, yield, and goodput.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-12-22T13:06:12Z) - Boundaries of quantum supremacy via random circuit sampling [69.16452769334367]
Google's recent quantum supremacy experiment heralded a transition point where quantum computing performed a computational task, random circuit sampling.
We examine the constraints of the observed quantum runtime advantage in a larger number of qubits and gates.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-05-05T20:11:53Z) - Using Quantum Metrological Bounds in Quantum Error Correction: A Simple
Proof of the Approximate Eastin-Knill Theorem [77.34726150561087]
We present a proof of the approximate Eastin-Knill theorem, which connects the quality of a quantum error-correcting code with its ability to achieve a universal set of logical gates.
Our derivation employs powerful bounds on the quantum Fisher information in generic quantum metrological protocols.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-04-24T17:58:10Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.