Membership-Doctor: Comprehensive Assessment of Membership Inference Against Machine Learning Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2208.10445v1
• Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2022 17:00:53 GMT
• Title: Membership-Doctor: Comprehensive Assessment of Membership Inference Against Machine Learning Models
• Authors: Xinlei He and Zheng Li and Weilin Xu and Cory Cornelius and Yang Zhang
• Abstract summary: We present a large-scale measurement of different membership inference attacks and defenses. We find that some assumptions of the threat model, such as same-architecture and same-distribution between shadow and target models, are unnecessary. We are also the first to execute attacks on the real-world data collected from the Internet, instead of laboratory datasets.
• Score: 11.842337448801066
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Machine learning models are prone to memorizing sensitive data, making them vulnerable to membership inference attacks in which an adversary aims to infer whether an input sample was used to train the model. Over the past few years, researchers have produced many membership inference attacks and defenses. However, these attacks and defenses employ a variety of strategies and are conducted in different models and datasets. The lack of comprehensive benchmark, however, means we do not understand the strengths and weaknesses of existing attacks and defenses. We fill this gap by presenting a large-scale measurement of different membership inference attacks and defenses. We systematize membership inference through the study of nine attacks and six defenses and measure the performance of different attacks and defenses in the holistic evaluation. We then quantify the impact of the threat model on the results of these attacks. We find that some assumptions of the threat model, such as same-architecture and same-distribution between shadow and target models, are unnecessary. We are also the first to execute attacks on the real-world data collected from the Internet, instead of laboratory datasets. We further investigate what determines the performance of membership inference attacks and reveal that the commonly believed overfitting level is not sufficient for the success of the attacks. Instead, the Jensen-Shannon distance of entropy/cross-entropy between member and non-member samples correlates with attack performance much better. This gives us a new way to accurately predict membership inference risks without running the attack. Finally, we find that data augmentation degrades the performance of existing attacks to a larger extent, and we propose an adaptive attack using augmentation to train shadow and attack models that improve attack performance.

Related papers

• Efficient Data-Free Model Stealing with Label Diversity [22.8804507954023]
  Machine learning as a Service (ML) allows users to query the machine learning model in an API manner, which provides an opportunity for users to enjoy the benefits brought by the high-performance model trained on valuable data. This interface boosts the proliferation of machine learning based applications, while on the other hand, it introduces the attack surface for model stealing attacks. Existing model stealing attacks have relaxed their attack assumptions to the data-free setting, while keeping the effectiveness. In this paper, we revisit the model stealing problem from a diversity perspective and demonstrate that keeping the generated data samples more diverse across all the classes is the critical point
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-29T18:52:33Z)
• Avoid Adversarial Adaption in Federated Learning by Multi-Metric Investigations [55.2480439325792]
  Federated Learning (FL) facilitates decentralized machine learning model training, preserving data privacy, lowering communication costs, and boosting model performance through diversified data sources. FL faces vulnerabilities such as poisoning attacks, undermining model integrity with both untargeted performance degradation and targeted backdoor attacks. We define a new notion of strong adaptive adversaries, capable of adapting to multiple objectives simultaneously. MESAS is the first defense robust against strong adaptive adversaries, effective in real-world data scenarios, with an average overhead of just 24.37 seconds.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-06T11:44:42Z)
• The Space of Adversarial Strategies [6.295859509997257]
  Adversarial examples, inputs designed to induce worst-case behavior in machine learning models, have been extensively studied over the past decade. We propose a systematic approach to characterize worst-case (i.e., optimal) adversaries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-09T20:53:11Z)
• Delving into Data: Effectively Substitute Training for Black-box Attack [84.85798059317963]
  We propose a novel perspective substitute training that focuses on designing the distribution of data used in the knowledge stealing process. The combination of these two modules can further boost the consistency of the substitute model and target model, which greatly improves the effectiveness of adversarial attack.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-26T07:26:29Z)
• Membership Inference Attacks on Machine Learning: A Survey [6.468846906231666]
  Membership inference attack aims to identify whether a data sample was used to train a machine learning model or not. It can raise severe privacy risks as the membership can reveal an individual's sensitive information. We present the first comprehensive survey of membership inference attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-14T06:10:47Z)
• ML-Doctor: Holistic Risk Assessment of Inference Attacks Against Machine Learning Models [64.03398193325572]
  Inference attacks against Machine Learning (ML) models allow adversaries to learn about training data, model parameters, etc. We concentrate on four attacks - namely, membership inference, model inversion, attribute inference, and model stealing. Our analysis relies on a modular re-usable software, ML-Doctor, which enables ML model owners to assess the risks of deploying their models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-04T11:35:13Z)
• Learning to Attack: Towards Textual Adversarial Attacking in Real-world Situations [81.82518920087175]
  Adversarial attacking aims to fool deep neural networks with adversarial examples. We propose a reinforcement learning based attack model, which can learn from attack history and launch attacks more efficiently.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-19T09:12:24Z)
• Sampling Attacks: Amplification of Membership Inference Attacks by Repeated Queries [74.59376038272661]
  We introduce sampling attack, a novel membership inference technique that unlike other standard membership adversaries is able to work under severe restriction of no access to scores of the victim model. We show that a victim model that only publishes the labels is still susceptible to sampling attacks and the adversary can recover up to 100% of its performance. For defense, we choose differential privacy in the form of gradient perturbation during the training of the victim model as well as output perturbation at prediction time.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-01T12:54:54Z)
• Membership Leakage in Label-Only Exposures [10.875144776014533]
  We propose decision-based membership inference attacks against machine learning models. In particular, we develop two types of decision-based attacks, namely transfer attack, and boundary attack. We also present new insights on the success of membership inference based on quantitative and qualitative analysis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-30T15:27:55Z)
• Label-Only Membership Inference Attacks [67.46072950620247]
  We introduce label-only membership inference attacks. Our attacks evaluate the robustness of a model's predicted labels under perturbations. We find that training models with differential privacy and (strong) L2 regularization are the only known defense strategies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-28T15:44:31Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.