Interactive Question Answering Systems: Literature Review

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2209.01621v3
• Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2024 13:21:14 GMT
• Title: Interactive Question Answering Systems: Literature Review
• Authors: Giovanni Maria Biancofiore, Yashar Deldjoo, Tommaso Di Noia, Eugenio Di Sciascio, Fedelucio Narducci,
• Abstract summary: Interactive question answering is a recently proposed and increasingly popular solution that resides at the intersection of question answering and dialogue systems. By permitting the user to ask more questions, interactive question answering enables users to dynamically interact with the system and receive more precise results. This survey offers a detailed overview of the interactive question-answering methods that are prevalent in current literature.
• Score: 17.033640293433397
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Question answering systems are recognized as popular and frequently effective means of information seeking on the web. In such systems, information seekers can receive a concise response to their query by presenting their questions in natural language. Interactive question answering is a recently proposed and increasingly popular solution that resides at the intersection of question answering and dialogue systems. On the one hand, the user can ask questions in normal language and locate the actual response to her inquiry; on the other hand, the system can prolong the question-answering session into a dialogue if there are multiple probable replies, very few, or ambiguities in the initial request. By permitting the user to ask more questions, interactive question answering enables users to dynamically interact with the system and receive more precise results. This survey offers a detailed overview of the interactive question-answering methods that are prevalent in current literature. It begins by explaining the foundational principles of question-answering systems, hence defining new notations and taxonomies to combine all identified works inside a unified framework. The reviewed published work on interactive question-answering systems is then presented and examined in terms of its proposed methodology, evaluation approaches, and dataset/application domain. We also describe trends surrounding specific tasks and issues raised by the community, so shedding light on the future interests of scholars. Our work is further supported by a GitHub page with a synthesis of all the major topics covered in this literature study. https://sisinflab.github.io/interactive-question-answering-systems-survey/

Related papers

• Social Commonsense-Guided Search Query Generation for Open-Domain Knowledge-Powered Conversations [66.16863141262506]
  We present a novel approach that focuses on generating internet search queries guided by social commonsense. Our proposed framework addresses passive user interactions by integrating topic tracking, commonsense response generation and instruction-driven query generation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-22T16:14:56Z)
• What Types of Questions Require Conversation to Answer? A Case Study of AskReddit Questions [16.75969771718778]
  We aim to push the boundaries of conversational systems by examining the types of nebulous, open-ended questions that can best be answered through conversation. We sampled 500 questions from one million open-ended requests posted on AskReddit, and then recruited online crowd workers to answer eight inquiries about these questions. We found that the issues people believe require conversation to resolve satisfactorily are highly social and personal.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-30T21:05:22Z)
• Medical Question Understanding and Answering with Knowledge Grounding and Semantic Self-Supervision [53.692793122749414]
  We introduce a medical question understanding and answering system with knowledge grounding and semantic self-supervision. Our system is a pipeline that first summarizes a long, medical, user-written question, using a supervised summarization loss. The system first matches the summarized user question with an FAQ from a trusted medical knowledge base, and then retrieves a fixed number of relevant sentences from the corresponding answer document.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-30T08:20:32Z)
• Evaluating Mixed-initiative Conversational Search Systems via User Simulation [9.066817876491053]
  We propose a conversational User Simulator, called USi, for automatic evaluation of such search systems. We show that responses generated by USi are both inline with the underlying information need and comparable to human-generated answers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-17T16:27:33Z)
• Question rewriting? Assessing its importance for conversational question answering [0.6449761153631166]
  This work presents a conversational question answering system designed specifically for the Search-Oriented Conversational AI (SCAI) shared task. In particular, we considered different variations of the question rewriting module to evaluate the influence on the subsequent components. Our system achieved the best performance in the shared task and our analysis emphasizes the importance of the conversation context representation for the overall system performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-22T23:31:25Z)
• Building and Evaluating Open-Domain Dialogue Corpora with Clarifying Questions [65.60888490988236]
  We release a dataset focused on open-domain single- and multi-turn conversations. We benchmark several state-of-the-art neural baselines. We propose a pipeline consisting of offline and online steps for evaluating the quality of clarifying questions in various dialogues.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-13T09:16:14Z)
• BERT-CoQAC: BERT-based Conversational Question Answering in Context [10.811729691130349]
  We introduce a framework based on a publically available pre-trained language model called BERT for incorporating history turns into the system. Experiment results revealed that our framework is comparable in performance with the state-of-the-art models on the QuAC leader board.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-23T03:05:17Z)
• A Graph-guided Multi-round Retrieval Method for Conversational Open-domain Question Answering [52.041815783025186]
  We propose a novel graph-guided retrieval method to model the relations among answers across conversation turns. We also propose to incorporate the multi-round relevance feedback technique to explore the impact of the retrieval context on current question understanding.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-17T04:39:41Z)
• Open-Retrieval Conversational Machine Reading [80.13988353794586]
  In conversational machine reading, systems need to interpret natural language rules, answer high-level questions, and ask follow-up clarification questions. Existing works assume the rule text is provided for each user question, which neglects the essential retrieval step in real scenarios. In this work, we propose and investigate an open-retrieval setting of conversational machine reading.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-17T08:55:01Z)
• Towards Data Distillation for End-to-end Spoken Conversational Question Answering [65.124088336738]
  We propose a new Spoken Conversational Question Answering task (SCQA) SCQA aims at enabling QA systems to model complex dialogues flow given the speech utterances and text corpora. Our main objective is to build a QA system to deal with conversational questions both in spoken and text forms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-18T05:53:39Z)
• An Empirical Study of Clarifying Question-Based Systems [15.767515065224016]
  We conduct an online experiment by deploying an experimental system, which interacts with users by asking clarifying questions against a product repository. We collect both implicit interaction behavior data and explicit feedback from users showing that: (a) users are willing to answer a good number of clarifying questions (11-21 on average), but not many more than that.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-01T15:10:11Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.