FairSNA: Algorithmic Fairness in Social Network Analysis

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2209.01678v2
• Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2024 15:17:28 GMT
• Title: FairSNA: Algorithmic Fairness in Social Network Analysis
• Authors: Akrati Saxena, George Fletcher, Mykola Pechenizkiy,
• Abstract summary: We highlight how the structural bias of social networks impacts the fairness of different methods. We discuss fairness aspects that should be considered while proposing network structure-based solutions for different SNA problems. We highlight various open research directions that require researchers' attention to bridge the gap between fairness and SNA.
• Score: 17.39106091928567
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: In recent years, designing fairness-aware methods has received much attention in various domains, including machine learning, natural language processing, and information retrieval. However, understanding structural bias and inequalities in social networks and designing fairness-aware methods for various research problems in social network analysis (SNA) have not received much attention. In this work, we highlight how the structural bias of social networks impacts the fairness of different SNA methods. We further discuss fairness aspects that should be considered while proposing network structure-based solutions for different SNA problems, such as link prediction, influence maximization, centrality ranking, and community detection. This paper clearly highlights that very few works have considered fairness and bias while proposing solutions; even these works are mainly focused on some research topics, such as link prediction, influence maximization, and PageRank. However, fairness has not yet been addressed for other research topics, such as influence blocking and community detection. We review state-of-the-art for different research topics in SNA, including the considered fairness constraints, their limitations, and our vision. This paper also covers evaluation metrics, available datasets, and synthetic network generating models used in such studies. Finally, we highlight various open research directions that require researchers' attention to bridge the gap between fairness and SNA.

Related papers

• Quantifying the Cross-sectoral Intersecting Discrepancies within Multiple Groups Using Latent Class Analysis Towards Fairness [6.683051393349788]
  This research introduces an innovative approach to quantify cross-sectoral intersecting discrepancies. We validate our approach using both proprietary and public datasets. Our findings reveal significant discrepancies between minority ethnic groups, highlighting the need for targeted interventions in real-world AI applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-24T08:10:31Z)
• Fairness meets Cross-Domain Learning: a new perspective on Models and Metrics [80.07271410743806]
  We study the relationship between cross-domain learning (CD) and model fairness. We introduce a benchmark on face and medical images spanning several demographic groups as well as classification and localization tasks. Our study covers 14 CD approaches alongside three state-of-the-art fairness algorithms and shows how the former can outperform the latter.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-25T09:34:05Z)
• Debiasing Methods for Fairer Neural Models in Vision and Language Research: A Survey [3.4767443062432326]
  We provide an in-depth overview of the main debiasing methods for fairness-aware neural networks. We propose a novel taxonomy to better organize the literature on debiasing methods for fairness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-10T14:42:46Z)
• Investigating Fairness Disparities in Peer Review: A Language Model Enhanced Approach [77.61131357420201]
  We conduct a thorough and rigorous study on fairness disparities in peer review with the help of large language models (LMs) We collect, assemble, and maintain a comprehensive relational database for the International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) conference from 2017 to date. We postulate and study fairness disparities on multiple protective attributes of interest, including author gender, geography, author, and institutional prestige.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-07T16:19:42Z)
• Causal Fairness Analysis [68.12191782657437]
  We introduce a framework for understanding, modeling, and possibly solving issues of fairness in decision-making settings. The main insight of our approach will be to link the quantification of the disparities present on the observed data with the underlying, and often unobserved, collection of causal mechanisms. Our effort culminates in the Fairness Map, which is the first systematic attempt to organize and explain the relationship between different criteria found in the literature.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-23T01:06:34Z)
• Fairness in Recommender Systems: Research Landscape and Future Directions [119.67643184567623]
  We review the concepts and notions of fairness that were put forward in the area in the recent past. We present an overview of how research in this field is currently operationalized. Overall, our analysis of recent works points to certain research gaps.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-23T08:34:25Z)
• Fair Representation Learning for Heterogeneous Information Networks [35.80367469624887]
  We propose a comprehensive set of de-biasing methods for fair HINs representation learning. We study the behavior of these algorithms, especially their capability in balancing the trade-off between fairness and prediction accuracy. We evaluate the performance of the proposed methods in an automated career counseling application.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-18T08:28:18Z)
• Through the Data Management Lens: Experimental Analysis and Evaluation of Fair Classification [75.49600684537117]
  Data management research is showing an increasing presence and interest in topics related to data and algorithmic fairness. We contribute a broad analysis of 13 fair classification approaches and additional variants, over their correctness, fairness, efficiency, scalability, and stability. Our analysis highlights novel insights on the impact of different metrics and high-level approach characteristics on different aspects of performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-18T22:55:40Z)
• Weight-Sharing Neural Architecture Search: A Battle to Shrink the Optimization Gap [90.93522795555724]
  Neural architecture search (NAS) has attracted increasing attentions in both academia and industry. Weight-sharing methods were proposed in which exponentially many architectures share weights in the same super-network. This paper provides a literature review on NAS, in particular the weight-sharing methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-04T11:57:03Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.