Quantum theory can consistently describe the use of itself in Frauchiger-Renner's Gedankenexperiment

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2209.08968v3
• Date: Fri, 12 May 2023 12:34:20 GMT
• Title: Quantum theory can consistently describe the use of itself in Frauchiger-Renner's Gedankenexperiment
• Authors: Ehsan Erfani Maharati, Mohsen Sarbishaei, Ali Ahanj
• Abstract summary: Frauchiger and Renner have presented a no-go theorem, which makes quantum mechanics more controversial. We discuss the validity of their proof approach in this letter.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Theoretical physics has faced many challenges since the advent of quantum mechanics. Recently, Frauchiger and Renner have presented a no-go theorem, which makes quantum mechanics more controversial. However, from our perspective, the process of proving appears questionable. Therefore, we discuss the validity of their proof approach in this letter. Here, we propose a simple thought experiment that clarifies how correctly the attributed quantum state can be written in problems similar to Frauchiger and Renner's Gedankenexperiment. In the next step, with the help of the correct form of the quantum state, it is demonstrated that a fallacy occurred in the proof of the no-go theorem, which means it cannot be valid because of the wrong proof. Ultimately, getting help from Hardy's paradox, we investigate whether there is an approach to modify their proof in order to lend the no-go theorem validity.

Related papers

• What Does '(Non)-Absoluteness of Observed Events' Mean? [0.0]
  We argue that the Wigner's friend paradox, the theorem of Bong et al and the theorem of Lawrence et al are all best understood as demonstrating that if quantum mechanics is universal. We also argue that these theorems taken together suggest interesting possibilities for a different kind of relational approach in which dynamical states are relativized whilst observed events are absolute.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-06T17:13:31Z)
• Logic meets Wigner's Friend (and their Friends) [49.1574468325115]
  We take a fresh look at Wigner's Friend thought-experiment and some of its more recent variants and extensions. We discuss various solutions proposed in the literature, focusing on a few questions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-04T13:31:56Z)
• Connecting classical finite exchangeability to quantum theory [69.62715388742298]
  Exchangeability is a fundamental concept in probability theory and statistics. We show how a de Finetti-like representation theorem for finitely exchangeable sequences requires a mathematical representation which is formally equivalent to quantum theory.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-06T17:15:19Z)
• Simple Tests of Quantumness Also Certify Qubits [69.96668065491183]
  A test of quantumness is a protocol that allows a classical verifier to certify (only) that a prover is not classical. We show that tests of quantumness that follow a certain template, which captures recent proposals such as (Kalai et al., 2022) can in fact do much more. Namely, the same protocols can be used for certifying a qubit, a building-block that stands at the heart of applications such as certifiable randomness and classical delegation of quantum computation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-02T14:18:17Z)
• Quantum dissipation and the virial theorem [22.1682776279474]
  We study the celebrated virial theorem for dissipative systems, both classical and quantum. The non-Markovian nature of the quantum noise leads to novel bath-induced terms in the virial theorem. We also consider the case of an electrical circuit with thermal noise and analyze the role of non-Markovian noise in the context of the virial theorem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-23T13:28:11Z)
• Testing quantum theory with thought experiments [4.847980206213335]
  How should one model systems that include agents who are themselves using quantum theory? We give a state-of-the-art overview on quantum thought experiments involving observers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-09T18:08:23Z)
• Post-Quantum Succinct Arguments: Breaking the Quantum Rewinding Barrier [73.70426431502803]
  We prove that Kilian's four-message succinct argument system is post-quantum secure in the standard model. This yields the first post-quantum succinct argument system from any falsifiable assumption.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-15T05:09:17Z)
• On the assumptions underlying KS-like contradictions [0.0]
  The Kochen-Specker theorem is one of the fundamental no-go theorems in quantum theory. We examine the hypotheses that, at the ontological level, lead to the KochenSpecker contradiction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-11T17:56:05Z)
• The Time-Evolution of States in Quantum Mechanics [77.34726150561087]
  It is argued that the Schr"odinger equation does not yield a correct description of the quantum-mechanical time evolution of states of isolated (open) systems featuring events. A precise general law for the time evolution of states replacing the Schr"odinger equation is formulated within the so-called ETH-Approach to Quantum Mechanics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-04T16:09:10Z)
• The rule of conditional probability is valid in quantum theory [Comment on Gelman & Yao's "Holes in Bayesian Statistics"] [0.0]
  In a recent manuscript, Gelman & Yao claim that "the usual rules of conditional probability fail in the quantum realm" This comment recalls some relevant literature in quantum theory and shows that (i) Gelman & Yao's statements are false; in fact, the quantum example confirms the rules of probability theory; (ii) the particular inequality found in the quantum example can be shown to appear also in very non-quantum examples, such as drawing from an urn.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-16T07:45:11Z)
• A Quantum G\"odelian Hunch [0.0]
  This essay aims at arguing for such G"odelian hunch via two case studies. The theological motivational origin of quantum contextuality is introduced in order to show how this result might be related to a Liar-like undecidability. A personal analysis of the related Wigner's friend thought experiment and and a recent paradox by Frauchiger and Renner is presented.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-07T11:22:20Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.