The Morbid Realities of Social Media: An Investigation into the Misinformation Shared by the Deceased Victims of COVID-19

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2209.09964v1
• Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2022 19:47:27 GMT
• Title: The Morbid Realities of Social Media: An Investigation into the Misinformation Shared by the Deceased Victims of COVID-19
• Authors: Hussam Habib and Rishab Nithyanand
• Abstract summary: We study a unique dataset of Facebook posts by users who shared and believed in Covid-19 misinformation before succumbing to Covid-19 often resulting in death. Our analysis reveals the overwhelming politicization of Covid-19 through the prevalence of anti-government themes. Results from this study bring insights into the responsibility of political elites in shaping public discourse and the platform's role in dampening the reach of harmful misinformation.
• Score: 0.4995343972237368
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Social media platforms have had considerable impact on the real world especially during the Covid-19 pandemic. Misinformation related to Covid-19 might have caused significant impact on the population specifically due to its association with dangerous beliefs such as anti-vaccination and Covid denial. In this work, we study a unique dataset of Facebook posts by users who shared and believed in Covid-19 misinformation before succumbing to Covid-19 often resulting in death. We aim to characterize the dominant themes and sources present in the victim's posts along with identifying the role of the platform in handling deadly narratives. Our analysis reveals the overwhelming politicization of Covid-19 through the prevalence of anti-government themes propagated by right-wing political and media ecosystem. Furthermore, we highlight the failures of Facebook's implementation and completeness of soft moderation actions intended to warn users of misinformation. Results from this study bring insights into the responsibility of political elites in shaping public discourse and the platform's role in dampening the reach of harmful misinformation.

Related papers

• YouTube COVID-19 Vaccine Misinformation on Twitter: Platform Interactions and Moderation Blind Spots [0.0]
  This study explores the relationship between Twitter and YouTube in spreading COVID-19 vaccine-related misinformation. We observe that a preponderance of anti-vaccine messaging remains among users who previously shared suspect information.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-27T12:55:58Z)
• Adherence to Misinformation on Social Media Through Socio-Cognitive and Group-Based Processes [79.79659145328856]
  We argue that when misinformation proliferates, this happens because the social media environment enables adherence to misinformation. We make the case that polarization and misinformation adherence are closely tied.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-30T12:34:24Z)
• "COVID-19 was a FIFA conspiracy #curropt": An Investigation into the Viral Spread of COVID-19 Misinformation [60.268682953952506]
  We estimate the extent to which misinformation has influenced the course of the COVID-19 pandemic using natural language processing models. We provide a strategy to combat social media posts that are likely to cause widespread harm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-12T19:41:01Z)
• Sentiment Analysis of Covid-19 Tweets using Evolutionary Classification-Based LSTM Model [0.6445605125467573]
  This paper represents the sentiment analysis on collected large number of tweets on Coronavirus or Covid-19. We analyze the trend of public sentiment on the topics related to Covid-19 epidemic using an evolutionary classification followed by the n-gram analysis. We trained the long-short term network using two types of rated tweets to predict sentiment on Covid-19 data and obtained an overall accuracy of 84.46%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-13T04:27:21Z)
• News consumption and social media regulations policy [70.31753171707005]
  We analyze two social media that enforced opposite moderation methods, Twitter and Gab, to assess the interplay between news consumption and content regulation. Our results show that the presence of moderation pursued by Twitter produces a significant reduction of questionable content. The lack of clear regulation on Gab results in the tendency of the user to engage with both types of content, showing a slight preference for the questionable ones which may account for a dissing/endorsement behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-07T19:26:32Z)
• The State of Infodemic on Twitter [0.0]
  Social media posts and platforms are at risk of rumors and misinformation in the face of the serious uncertainty surrounding the virus itself. We have presented an exploratory analysis of the tweets and the users who are involved in spreading misinformation. We then delved into machine learning models and natural language processing techniques to identify if a tweet contains misinformation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-17T10:58:35Z)
• ExcavatorCovid: Extracting Events and Relations from Text Corpora for Temporal and Causal Analysis for COVID-19 [63.72766553648224]
  ExcavatorCovid is a machine reading system that ingests open-source text documents. It extracts COVID19 related events and relations between them, and builds a Temporal and Causal Analysis Graph.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-05T01:18:46Z)
• Misinfo Belief Frames: A Case Study on Covid & Climate News [49.979419711713795]
  We propose a formalism for understanding how readers perceive the reliability of news and the impact of misinformation. We introduce the Misinfo Belief Frames (MBF) corpus, a dataset of 66k inferences over 23.5k headlines. Our results using large-scale language modeling to predict misinformation frames show that machine-generated inferences can influence readers' trust in news headlines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-18T09:50:11Z)
• Social Media COVID-19 Misinformation Interventions Viewed Positively, But Have Limited Impact [16.484676698355884]
  Social media platforms like Facebook and Twitter rolled out design interventions, including banners linking to authoritative resources and more specific "false information" labels. We found that most participants indicated a positive attitude towards interventions, particularly post-specific labels for misinformation. Still, the majority of participants discovered or corrected misinformation through other means, most commonly web searches, suggesting room for platforms to do more to stem the spread of COVID-19 misinformation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-21T00:02:04Z)
• Analysis of misinformation during the COVID-19 outbreak in China: cultural, social and political entanglements [6.256108383411306]
  COVID-19 resulted in an infodemic, which could erode public trust, impede virus containment, and outlive the pandemic itself. The evolving and fragmented media landscape is a key driver of the spread of misinformation. Our findings shed light on the distinct characteristics of misinformation during the COVID-19 and offer insights into combating misinformation in China and across the world at large.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-21T01:34:08Z)
• The Ivory Tower Lost: How College Students Respond Differently than the General Public to the COVID-19 Pandemic [66.80677233314002]
  Pandemic of the novel Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) has presented governments with ultimate challenges. In the United States, the country with the highest confirmed COVID-19 infection cases, a nationwide social distancing protocol has been implemented by the President. This paper aims to discover the social implications of this unprecedented disruption in our interactive society by mining people's opinions on social media.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-21T13:02:38Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.