Probing of Quantitative Values in Abstractive Summarization Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2210.00667v1
• Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2022 00:59:50 GMT
• Title: Probing of Quantitative Values in Abstractive Summarization Models
• Authors: Nathan M. White
• Abstract summary: We evaluate the efficacy of abstract summarization models' modeling of quantitative values found in the input text. Our results show that in most cases, the encoders of recent SOTA-performing models struggle to provide embeddings that adequately represent quantitative values.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Abstractive text summarization has recently become a popular approach, but data hallucination remains a serious problem, including with quantitative data. We propose a set of probing tests to evaluate the efficacy of abstract summarization models' modeling of quantitative values found in the input text. Our results show that in most cases, the encoders of recent SOTA-performing models struggle to provide embeddings that adequately represent quantitative values in the input compared to baselines, and in particular, they outperform random representations in some, but surprisingly not all, cases. Under our assumptions, this suggests that the encoder's performance contributes to the quantity hallucination problem. One model type in particular, DistilBART-CDM, was observed to underperform randomly initialized representations for several experiments, and performance versus BERT suggests that standard pretraining and fine-tuning approaches for the summarization task may play a role in underperformance for some encoders.

Related papers

• Low-rank finetuning for LLMs: A fairness perspective [54.13240282850982]
  Low-rank approximation techniques have become the de facto standard for fine-tuning Large Language Models. This paper investigates the effectiveness of these methods in capturing the shift of fine-tuning datasets from the initial pre-trained data distribution. We show that low-rank fine-tuning inadvertently preserves undesirable biases and toxic behaviors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-28T20:43:53Z)
• Outlier Gradient Analysis: Efficiently Identifying Detrimental Training Samples for Deep Learning Models [36.05242956018461]
  In this paper, we establish a bridge between identifying detrimental training samples via influence functions and outlier gradient detection. We first validate the hypothesis of our proposed outlier gradient analysis approach on synthetic datasets. We then demonstrate its effectiveness in detecting mislabeled samples in vision models and selecting data samples for improving performance of natural language processing transformer models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-06T21:34:46Z)
• VALOR-EVAL: Holistic Coverage and Faithfulness Evaluation of Large Vision-Language Models [57.43276586087863]
  Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) suffer from hallucination issues, wherein the models generate plausible-sounding but factually incorrect outputs. Existing benchmarks are often limited in scope, focusing mainly on object hallucinations. We introduce a multi-dimensional benchmark covering objects, attributes, and relations, with challenging images selected based on associative biases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-22T04:49:22Z)
• Zero-Shot Multi-task Hallucination Detection [8.539639901976594]
  hallucination is an emergent condition in the model where generated text lacks faithfulness to the source. We formally define hallucination and propose a framework for its quantitative detection in a zero-shot setting. In detecting hallucinations, our solution achieves an accuracy of 0.78 in a model-aware setting and 0.61 in a model-agnostic setting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-18T20:50:26Z)
• AMRFact: Enhancing Summarization Factuality Evaluation with AMR-Driven Negative Samples Generation [57.8363998797433]
  We propose AMRFact, a framework that generates perturbed summaries using Abstract Meaning Representations (AMRs) Our approach parses factually consistent summaries into AMR graphs and injects controlled factual inconsistencies to create negative examples, allowing for coherent factually inconsistent summaries to be generated with high error-type coverage.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-16T02:56:29Z)
• Improving the Robustness of Summarization Models by Detecting and Removing Input Noise [50.27105057899601]
  We present a large empirical study quantifying the sometimes severe loss in performance from different types of input noise for a range of datasets and model sizes. We propose a light-weight method for detecting and removing such noise in the input during model inference without requiring any training, auxiliary models, or even prior knowledge of the type of noise.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-20T00:33:11Z)
• Tokenization Consistency Matters for Generative Models on Extractive NLP Tasks [54.306234256074255]
  We identify the issue of tokenization inconsistency that is commonly neglected in training generative models. This issue damages the extractive nature of these tasks after the input and output are tokenized inconsistently. We show that, with consistent tokenization, the model performs better in both in-domain and out-of-domain datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-19T23:33:21Z)
• Improving Pre-trained Language Model Fine-tuning with Noise Stability Regularization [94.4409074435894]
  We propose a novel and effective fine-tuning framework, named Layerwise Noise Stability Regularization (LNSR) Specifically, we propose to inject the standard Gaussian noise and regularize hidden representations of the fine-tuned model. We demonstrate the advantages of the proposed method over other state-of-the-art algorithms including L2-SP, Mixout and SMART.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-12T04:42:49Z)
• Zero-shot Adversarial Quantization [11.722728148523366]
  We propose a zero-shot adversarial quantization (ZAQ) framework, facilitating effective discrepancy estimation and knowledge transfer. This is achieved by a novel two-level discrepancy modeling to drive a generator to synthesize informative and diverse data examples. We conduct extensive experiments on three fundamental vision tasks, demonstrating the superiority of ZAQ over the strong zero-shot baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-29T01:33:34Z)
• On a Guided Nonnegative Matrix Factorization [9.813862201223973]
  We propose an approach based upon the nonnegative matrix factorization (NMF) model, deemed textit NMF, that incorporates user-designed seed word supervision. Our experimental results demonstrate the promise of this model and illustrate that it is competitive with other methods of this ilk with only very little supervision information.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-22T01:06:17Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.