Using Full-Text Content to Characterize and Identify Best Seller Books

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2210.02334v2
• Date: Thu, 11 May 2023 12:37:00 GMT
• Title: Using Full-Text Content to Characterize and Identify Best Seller Books
• Authors: Giovana D. da Silva, Filipi N. Silva, Henrique F. de Arruda, B\'arbara C. e Souza, Luciano da F. Costa and Diego R. Amancio
• Abstract summary: We consider the task of predicting whether a book will become a best seller from the standpoint of literary works. Dissimilarly from previous approaches, we focused on the full content of books and considered visualization and classification tasks. Our results show that it is unfeasible to predict the success of books with high accuracy using only the full content of the texts.
• Score: 0.6442904501384817
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Artistic pieces can be studied from several perspectives, one example being their reception among readers over time. In the present work, we approach this interesting topic from the standpoint of literary works, particularly assessing the task of predicting whether a book will become a best seller. Dissimilarly from previous approaches, we focused on the full content of books and considered visualization and classification tasks. We employed visualization for the preliminary exploration of the data structure and properties, involving SemAxis and linear discriminant analyses. Then, to obtain quantitative and more objective results, we employed various classifiers. Such approaches were used along with a dataset containing (i) books published from 1895 to 1924 and consecrated as best sellers by the Publishers Weekly Bestseller Lists and (ii) literary works published in the same period but not being mentioned in that list. Our comparison of methods revealed that the best-achieved result - combining a bag-of-words representation with a logistic regression classifier - led to an average accuracy of 0.75 both for the leave-one-out and 10-fold cross-validations. Such an outcome suggests that it is unfeasible to predict the success of books with high accuracy using only the full content of the texts. Nevertheless, our findings provide insights into the factors leading to the relative success of a literary work.

Related papers

• LFED: A Literary Fiction Evaluation Dataset for Large Language Models [58.85989777743013]
  We collect 95 literary fictions that are either originally written in Chinese or translated into Chinese, covering a wide range of topics across several centuries. We define a question taxonomy with 8 question categories to guide the creation of 1,304 questions. We conduct an in-depth analysis to ascertain how specific attributes of literary fictions (e.g., novel types, character numbers, the year of publication) impact LLM performance in evaluations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-16T15:02:24Z)
• STONYBOOK: A System and Resource for Large-Scale Analysis of Novels [11.304581370821756]
  Books have historically been the primary mechanism through which narratives are transmitted. We have developed a collection of resources for the large-scale analysis of novels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-06T23:46:40Z)
• PART: Pre-trained Authorship Representation Transformer [64.78260098263489]
  Authors writing documents imprint identifying information within their texts: vocabulary, registry, punctuation, misspellings, or even emoji usage. Previous works use hand-crafted features or classification tasks to train their authorship models, leading to poor performance on out-of-domain authors. We propose a contrastively trained model fit to learn textbfauthorship embeddings instead of semantics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-30T11:08:39Z)
• Whodunit? Learning to Contrast for Authorship Attribution [22.37948005237967]
  Authorship attribution is the task of identifying the author of a given text. We propose to fine-tune pre-trained language representations using a combination of contrastive learning and supervised learning. We show that Contra-X advances the state-of-the-art on multiple human and machine authorship attribution benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-23T23:45:08Z)
• Fine-Grained Visual Entailment [51.66881737644983]
  We propose an extension of this task, where the goal is to predict the logical relationship of fine-grained knowledge elements within a piece of text to an image. Unlike prior work, our method is inherently explainable and makes logical predictions at different levels of granularity. We evaluate our method on a new dataset of manually annotated knowledge elements and show that our method achieves 68.18% accuracy at this challenging task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-29T16:09:38Z)
• Modeling Social Readers: Novel Tools for Addressing Reception from Online Book Reviews [0.0]
  We study the readers' distillation of the main storylines in a novel using a corpus of reviews of five popular novels. We make three important contributions to the study of infinite vocabulary networks. We present a new sequencing algorithm, REV2SEQ, that generates a consensus sequence of events based on partial trajectories aggregated from the reviews.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-03T20:10:14Z)
• Weakly-Supervised Aspect-Based Sentiment Analysis via Joint Aspect-Sentiment Topic Embedding [71.2260967797055]
  We propose a weakly-supervised approach for aspect-based sentiment analysis. We learn sentiment, aspect> joint topic embeddings in the word embedding space. We then use neural models to generalize the word-level discriminative information.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-13T21:33:24Z)
• Abstractive Summarization of Spoken and Written Instructions with BERT [66.14755043607776]
  We present the first application of the BERTSum model to conversational language. We generate abstractive summaries of narrated instructional videos across a wide variety of topics. We envision this integrated as a feature in intelligent virtual assistants, enabling them to summarize both written and spoken instructional content upon request.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-21T20:59:34Z)
• A Survey on Text Classification: From Shallow to Deep Learning [83.47804123133719]
  The last decade has seen a surge of research in this area due to the unprecedented success of deep learning. This paper fills the gap by reviewing the state-of-the-art approaches from 1961 to 2021. We create a taxonomy for text classification according to the text involved and the models used for feature extraction and classification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-02T00:09:03Z)
• Book Success Prediction with Pretrained Sentence Embeddings and Readability Scores [8.37609145576126]
  We propose a model that leverages pretrained sentence embeddings along with various readability scores for book success prediction. Our proposed model outperforms strong baselines for this task by as large as 6.4% F1-score points.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-21T20:11:18Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.