Commitments to Quantum States
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2210.05138v2
- Date: Sat, 5 Nov 2022 00:25:18 GMT
- Title: Commitments to Quantum States
- Authors: Sam Gunn and Nathan Ju and Fermi Ma and Mark Zhandry
- Abstract summary: A commitment to quantum messages is binding if, after the commit phase, the committed state is hidden from the sender's view.
We show that hiding quantum state commitments (QSCs) are implied by any commitment scheme for classical messages.
Commitments to quantum states open the door to many new cryptographic possibilities.
- Score: 11.217084610985674
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: What does it mean to commit to a quantum state? In this work, we propose a
simple answer: a commitment to quantum messages is binding if, after the commit
phase, the committed state is hidden from the sender's view. We accompany this
new definition with several instantiations. We build the first non-interactive
succinct quantum state commitments, which can be seen as an analogue of
collision-resistant hashing for quantum messages. We also show that hiding
quantum state commitments (QSCs) are implied by any commitment scheme for
classical messages. All of our constructions can be based on
quantum-cryptographic assumptions that are implied by but are potentially
weaker than one-way functions.
Commitments to quantum states open the door to many new cryptographic
possibilities. Our flagship application of a succinct QSC is a
quantum-communication version of Kilian's succinct arguments for any language
that has quantum PCPs with constant error and polylogarithmic locality.
Plugging in the PCP theorem, this yields succinct arguments for NP under
significantly weaker assumptions than required classically; moreover, if the
quantum PCP conjecture holds, this extends to QMA. At the heart of our security
proof is a new rewinding technique for extracting quantum information.
Related papers
- Oracle Separation Between Quantum Commitments and Quantum One-wayness [0.6882042556551611]
We show that there exists a unitary quantum oracle relative to which quantum commitments exist but no (efficiently verifiable) one-way state generators exist.
Recent work has shown that commitments can be constructed from one-way state generators, but the other direction has remained open.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-04T12:26:21Z) - Classical Commitments to Quantum States [5.6739502570965765]
We define the notion of a classical commitment scheme to quantum states.
It allows a quantum prover to compute a classical commitment to a quantum state, and later open each qubit of the state in either the standard or the Hadamard basis.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-19T22:31:18Z) - The Power of Unentangled Quantum Proofs with Non-negative Amplitudes [55.90795112399611]
We study the power of unentangled quantum proofs with non-negative amplitudes, a class which we denote $textQMA+(2)$.
In particular, we design global protocols for small set expansion, unique games, and PCP verification.
We show that QMA(2) is equal to $textQMA+(2)$ provided the gap of the latter is a sufficiently large constant.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-29T01:35:46Z) - Simple Tests of Quantumness Also Certify Qubits [69.96668065491183]
A test of quantumness is a protocol that allows a classical verifier to certify (only) that a prover is not classical.
We show that tests of quantumness that follow a certain template, which captures recent proposals such as (Kalai et al., 2022) can in fact do much more.
Namely, the same protocols can be used for certifying a qubit, a building-block that stands at the heart of applications such as certifiable randomness and classical delegation of quantum computation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-02T14:18:17Z) - Quantum oblivious transfer: a short review [0.06554326244334865]
We study the concept of oblivious transfer in the area of theoretical quantum cryptography.
We review the impossibility results that daunt this primitive and discuss several quantum security models under which it is possible to prove QOT security.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-06T15:19:26Z) - Quantum Semantic Communications for Resource-Efficient Quantum Networking [52.3355619190963]
This letter proposes a novel quantum semantic communications (QSC) framework exploiting advancements in quantum machine learning and quantum semantic representations.
The proposed framework achieves approximately 50-75% reduction in quantum communication resources needed, while achieving a higher quantum semantic fidelity.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-05-05T03:49:19Z) - Depth-efficient proofs of quantumness [77.34726150561087]
A proof of quantumness is a type of challenge-response protocol in which a classical verifier can efficiently certify quantum advantage of an untrusted prover.
In this paper, we give two proof of quantumness constructions in which the prover need only perform constant-depth quantum circuits.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-07-05T17:45:41Z) - Post-Quantum Succinct Arguments: Breaking the Quantum Rewinding Barrier [73.70426431502803]
We prove that Kilian's four-message succinct argument system is post-quantum secure in the standard model.
This yields the first post-quantum succinct argument system from any falsifiable assumption.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-03-15T05:09:17Z) - Direct Quantum Communications in the Presence of Realistic Noisy
Entanglement [69.25543534545538]
We propose a novel quantum communication scheme relying on realistic noisy pre-shared entanglement.
Our performance analysis shows that the proposed scheme offers competitive QBER, yield, and goodput.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-12-22T13:06:12Z) - A Black-Box Approach to Post-Quantum Zero-Knowledge in Constant Rounds [12.525959293825318]
We construct a constant round interactive proof for NP that satisfies statistical soundness and black-box $epsilon$-zero-knowledge against quantum attacks.
At the heart of our results is a new quantum rewinding technique that enables a simulator to extract a committed message of a malicious verifier.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-11-05T05:40:05Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.