Neural Networks are Decision Trees

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2210.05189v1
• Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2022 06:49:51 GMT
• Title: Neural Networks are Decision Trees
• Authors: Caglar Aytekin
• Abstract summary: We show that any neural network having piece-wise linear activation functions can be represented as a decision tree. The representation is equivalence and not an approximation, thus keeping the accuracy of the neural network exactly as is.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: In this manuscript, we show that any neural network having piece-wise linear activation functions can be represented as a decision tree. The representation is equivalence and not an approximation, thus keeping the accuracy of the neural network exactly as is. This equivalence shows that neural networks are indeed interpretable by design and makes the \textit{black-box} understanding obsolete. We share equivalent trees of some neural networks and show that besides providing interpretability, tree representation can also achieve some computational advantages. The analysis holds both for fully connected and convolutional networks, which may or may not also include skip connections and/or normalizations.

Related papers

• Coding schemes in neural networks learning classification tasks [52.22978725954347]
  We investigate fully-connected, wide neural networks learning classification tasks. We show that the networks acquire strong, data-dependent features. Surprisingly, the nature of the internal representations depends crucially on the neuronal nonlinearity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-24T14:50:05Z)
• Graph Neural Networks for Learning Equivariant Representations of Neural Networks [55.04145324152541]
  We propose to represent neural networks as computational graphs of parameters. Our approach enables a single model to encode neural computational graphs with diverse architectures. We showcase the effectiveness of our method on a wide range of tasks, including classification and editing of implicit neural representations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-18T18:01:01Z)
• Closed-Form Interpretation of Neural Network Classifiers with Symbolic Gradients [0.7832189413179361]
  I introduce a unified framework for finding a closed-form interpretation of any single neuron in an artificial neural network. I demonstrate how to interpret neural network classifiers to reveal closed-form expressions of the concepts encoded in their decision boundaries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-10T07:47:42Z)
• Detecting Modularity in Deep Neural Networks [8.967870619902211]
  We consider the problem of assessing the modularity exhibited by a partitioning of a network's neurons. We propose two proxies for this: importance, which reflects how crucial sets of neurons are to network performance; and coherence, which reflects how consistently their neurons associate with features of the inputs. We show that these partitionings, even ones based only on weights, reveal groups of neurons that are important and coherent.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-13T20:33:30Z)
• Dynamic Inference with Neural Interpreters [72.90231306252007]
  We present Neural Interpreters, an architecture that factorizes inference in a self-attention network as a system of modules. inputs to the model are routed through a sequence of functions in a way that is end-to-end learned. We show that Neural Interpreters perform on par with the vision transformer using fewer parameters, while being transferrable to a new task in a sample efficient manner.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-12T23:22:45Z)
• Dive into Layers: Neural Network Capacity Bounding using Algebraic Geometry [55.57953219617467]
  We show that the learnability of a neural network is directly related to its size. We use Betti numbers to measure the topological geometric complexity of input data and the neural network. We perform the experiments on a real-world dataset MNIST and the results verify our analysis and conclusion.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-03T11:45:51Z)
• Sparse Oblique Decision Trees: A Tool to Understand and Manipulate Neural Net Features [3.222802562733787]
  We focus on understanding which of the internal features computed by the neural net are responsible for a particular class. We show we can easily manipulate the neural net features in order to make the net predict, or not predict, a given class, thus showing that it is possible to carry out adversarial attacks at the level of the features.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-07T05:31:08Z)
• The Representation Theory of Neural Networks [7.724617675868718]
  We show that neural networks can be represented via the mathematical theory of quiver representations. We show that network quivers gently adapt to common neural network concepts. We also provide a quiver representation model to understand how a neural network creates representations from the data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-23T19:02:14Z)
• Graph Structure of Neural Networks [104.33754950606298]
  We show how the graph structure of neural networks affect their predictive performance. A "sweet spot" of relational graphs leads to neural networks with significantly improved predictive performance. Top-performing neural networks have graph structure surprisingly similar to those of real biological neural networks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-13T17:59:31Z)
• Towards Understanding Hierarchical Learning: Benefits of Neural Representations [160.33479656108926]
  In this work, we demonstrate that intermediate neural representations add more flexibility to neural networks. We show that neural representation can achieve improved sample complexities compared with the raw input. Our results characterize when neural representations are beneficial, and may provide a new perspective on why depth is important in deep learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-24T02:44:54Z)
• Neural Rule Ensembles: Encoding Sparse Feature Interactions into Neural Networks [3.7277730514654555]
  We use decision trees to capture relevant features and their interactions and define a mapping to encode extracted relationships into a neural network. At the same time through feature selection it enables learning of compact representations compared to state of the art tree-based approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-11T11:22:20Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.