Draft, Sketch, and Prove: Guiding Formal Theorem Provers with Informal Proofs

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2210.12283v1
• Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2022 22:37:22 GMT
• Title: Draft, Sketch, and Prove: Guiding Formal Theorem Provers with Informal Proofs
• Authors: Albert Q. Jiang, Sean Welleck, Jin Peng Zhou, Wenda Li, Jiacheng Liu, Mateja Jamnik, Timoth\'ee Lacroix, Yuhuai Wu, Guillaume Lample
• Abstract summary: We introduce Draft, Sketch, and Prove (DSP), a method that maps informal proofs to formal proof sketches. We show that large language models are able to produce well-structured formal sketches that follow the same reasoning steps as the informal proofs.
• Score: 30.57062828812679
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The formalization of existing mathematical proofs is a notoriously difficult process. Despite decades of research on automation and proof assistants, writing formal proofs remains arduous and only accessible to a few experts. While previous studies to automate formalization focused on powerful search algorithms, no attempts were made to take advantage of available informal proofs. In this work, we introduce Draft, Sketch, and Prove (DSP), a method that maps informal proofs to formal proof sketches, and uses the sketches to guide an automated prover by directing its search to easier sub-problems. We investigate two relevant setups where informal proofs are either written by humans or generated by a language model. Our experiments and ablation studies show that large language models are able to produce well-structured formal sketches that follow the same reasoning steps as the informal proofs. Guiding an automated prover with these sketches enhances its performance from 20.9% to 39.3% on a collection of mathematical competition problems.

Related papers

• Lean-STaR: Learning to Interleave Thinking and Proving [53.923617816215774]
  We present Lean-STaR, a framework for training language models to produce informal thoughts prior to each step of a proof. Lean-STaR achieves state-of-the-art results on the miniF2F-test benchmark within the Lean theorem proving environment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-14T01:43:07Z)
• Autoformalizing Euclidean Geometry [74.72212706513318]
  We introduce a neuro-symbolic framework for autoformalizing Euclidean geometry. One challenge is that informal proofs rely on diagrams, leaving gaps in texts that are hard to formalize. We provide automatic semantic evaluation for autoformalized theorem statements.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-27T14:35:10Z)
• Learn from Failure: Fine-Tuning LLMs with Trial-and-Error Data for Intuitionistic Propositional Logic Proving [41.23045212775232]
  We demonstrate the benefit of training models that additionally learn from failed search paths. Facing the lack of such trial-and-error data in existing open-source theorem-proving datasets, we curate a dataset on intuitionistic propositional logic theorems. We compare our model trained on relatively short trial-and-error information (TrialMaster) with models trained only on the correct paths and discover that the former solves more unseen theorems with lower trial searches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-10T23:01:45Z)
• MUSTARD: Mastering Uniform Synthesis of Theorem and Proof Data [85.50740598523818]
  MUSTARD is a framework that masters uniform synthesis of theorem and proof data of high quality and diversity. We present a theorem-and-proof benchmark MUSTARDSAUCE with 5,866 valid data points. We perform extensive analysis and demonstrate that MUSTARD generates validated high-quality step-by-step data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-14T05:57:58Z)
• Baldur: Whole-Proof Generation and Repair with Large Language Models [8.100054850290507]
  We use large language models, trained on natural language text and code and fine-tuned on proofs, to generate whole proofs for theorems at once. We combine this proof generation model with a fine-tuned repair model to repair generated proofs, further increasing proving power. We evaluate our method in a prototype, Baldur, and evaluate it on a benchmark of 6,336 Isabelle/HOL theorems and their proofs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-08T22:00:15Z)
• ProofNet: Autoformalizing and Formally Proving Undergraduate-Level Mathematics [7.607254619341369]
  We introduce ProofNet, a benchmark for autoformalization and formal proving of undergraduate-level mathematics. The ProofNet benchmarks consists of 371 examples, each consisting of a formal theorem statement in Lean 3. We report baseline results on statement autoformalization via in-context learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-24T03:28:46Z)
• Towards a Mathematics Formalisation Assistant using Large Language Models [5.485439959027125]
  We explore the abilities of a large language model (Codex) to help with formalisation in the Lean theorem prover. Codex is able to formalise short mathematical statements at undergrad level with nearly 75% accuracy for $120$ theorem statements. We show that with a new prompting strategy Codex can formalise these proofs in natural language with at least one out of twelve Codex completion being easy to repair into a complete proof.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-14T16:52:32Z)
• NaturalProver: Grounded Mathematical Proof Generation with Language Models [84.2064569475095]
  Theorem proving in natural mathematical language plays a central role in mathematical advances and education. We develop NaturalProver, a language model that generates proofs by conditioning on background references. NaturalProver is capable of proving some theorems that require short (2-6 step) proofs, and providing next-step suggestions that are rated as correct and useful over 40% of the time.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-25T17:01:18Z)
• Generating Natural Language Proofs with Verifier-Guided Search [74.9614610172561]
  We present a novel stepwise method NLProofS (Natural Language Proof Search) NLProofS learns to generate relevant steps conditioning on the hypothesis. It achieves state-of-the-art performance on EntailmentBank and RuleTaker.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-25T02:22:30Z)
• Formal Mathematics Statement Curriculum Learning [64.45821687940946]
  We show that at same compute budget, expert iteration, by which we mean proof search interleaved with learning, dramatically outperforms proof search only. We also observe that when applied to a collection of formal statements of sufficiently varied difficulty, expert iteration is capable of finding and solving a curriculum of increasingly difficult problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-03T00:17:00Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.