Training Dynamics for Curriculum Learning: A Study on Monolingual and Cross-lingual NLU

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2210.12499v1
• Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2022 17:10:04 GMT
• Title: Training Dynamics for Curriculum Learning: A Study on Monolingual and Cross-lingual NLU
• Authors: Fenia Christopoulou, Gerasimos Lampouras, Ignacio Iacobacci
• Abstract summary: Curriculum Learning (CL) is a technique of training models via ranking examples in a typically increasing difficulty trend. In this work, we employ CL for Natural Language Understanding (NLU) tasks by taking advantage of training dynamics as difficulty metrics. Experiments indicate that training dynamics can lead to better performing models with smoother training compared to other difficulty metrics.
• Score: 19.42920238320109
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Curriculum Learning (CL) is a technique of training models via ranking examples in a typically increasing difficulty trend with the aim of accelerating convergence and improving generalisability. Current approaches for Natural Language Understanding (NLU) tasks use CL to improve in-distribution data performance often via heuristic-oriented or task-agnostic difficulties. In this work, instead, we employ CL for NLU by taking advantage of training dynamics as difficulty metrics, i.e., statistics that measure the behavior of the model at hand on specific task-data instances during training and propose modifications of existing CL schedulers based on these statistics. Differently from existing works, we focus on evaluating models on in-distribution (ID), out-of-distribution (OOD) as well as zero-shot (ZS) cross-lingual transfer datasets. We show across several NLU tasks that CL with training dynamics can result in better performance mostly on zero-shot cross-lingual transfer and OOD settings with improvements up by 8.5% in certain cases. Overall, experiments indicate that training dynamics can lead to better performing models with smoother training compared to other difficulty metrics while being 20% faster on average. In addition, through analysis we shed light on the correlations of task-specific versus task-agnostic metrics.

Related papers

• What Do Learning Dynamics Reveal About Generalization in LLM Reasoning? [83.83230167222852]
  We find that a model's generalization behavior can be effectively characterized by a training metric we call pre-memorization train accuracy. By connecting a model's learning behavior to its generalization, pre-memorization train accuracy can guide targeted improvements to training strategies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-12T09:52:40Z)
• Does the Definition of Difficulty Matter? Scoring Functions and their Role for Curriculum Learning [42.4526628515253]
  Curriculum learning (CL) describes a machine learning training strategy in which samples are gradually introduced into the training process based on their difficulty. We study the robustness and similarity of the most common scoring functions for sample difficulty estimation. We find that the robustness of scoring functions across random seeds positively correlates with CL performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-01T18:55:31Z)
• Deciphering Cross-Modal Alignment in Large Vision-Language Models with Modality Integration Rate [118.37653302885607]
  We present the Modality Integration Rate (MIR), an effective, robust, and generalized metric to indicate the multi-modal pre-training quality of Large Vision Language Models (LVLMs) MIR is indicative about training data selection, training strategy schedule, and model architecture design to get better pre-training results.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-09T17:59:04Z)
• A Psychology-based Unified Dynamic Framework for Curriculum Learning [5.410910735259908]
  This paper presents a Psychology-based Unified Dynamic Framework for Curriculum Learning (PUDF) We quantify the difficulty of training data by applying Item Response Theory (IRT) to responses from Artificial Crowds (AC) We propose a Dynamic Data Selection via Model Ability Estimation (DDS-MAE) strategy to schedule the appropriate amount of data during model training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-09T20:30:37Z)
• Investigating the Pre-Training Dynamics of In-Context Learning: Task Recognition vs. Task Learning [99.05401042153214]
  In-context learning (ICL) is potentially attributed to two major abilities: task recognition (TR) and task learning (TL) We take the first step by examining the pre-training dynamics of the emergence of ICL. We propose a simple yet effective method to better integrate these two abilities for ICL at inference time.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-20T06:37:47Z)
• Uncertainty Aware Learning for Language Model Alignment [97.36361196793929]
  We propose uncertainty-aware learning (UAL) to improve the model alignment of different task scenarios. We implement UAL in a simple fashion -- adaptively setting the label smoothing value of training according to the uncertainty of individual samples. Experiments on widely used benchmarks demonstrate that our UAL significantly and consistently outperforms standard supervised fine-tuning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-07T11:37:45Z)
• How does Multi-Task Training Affect Transformer In-Context Capabilities? Investigations with Function Classes [6.652837942112205]
  Large language models (LLM) have recently shown the extraordinary ability to perform unseen tasks based on few-shot examples provided as text. We propose several effective curriculum learning strategies that allow ICL models to achieve higher data efficiency and more stable convergence. Our experiments reveal that ICL models can effectively learn difficult tasks by training on progressively harder tasks while mixing in prior tasks, denoted as mixed curriculum in this work.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-04T16:15:23Z)
• On Task Performance and Model Calibration with Supervised and Self-Ensembled In-Context Learning [71.44986275228747]
  In-context learning (ICL) has become an efficient approach propelled by the recent advancements in large language models (LLMs) However, both paradigms are prone to suffer from the critical problem of overconfidence (i.e., miscalibration)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-21T11:55:10Z)
• ALP: Action-Aware Embodied Learning for Perception [60.64801970249279]
  We introduce Action-Aware Embodied Learning for Perception (ALP) ALP incorporates action information into representation learning through a combination of optimizing a reinforcement learning policy and an inverse dynamics prediction objective. We show that ALP outperforms existing baselines in several downstream perception tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-16T21:51:04Z)
• Data Curation Alone Can Stabilize In-context Learning [20.874674130060388]
  In-context learning (ICL) enables large language models to perform new tasks by prompting them with a sequence of training examples. randomly sampling examples from a training set leads to high variance in performance. We show that carefully curating a subset of training data greatly stabilizes ICL performance without any other changes to the ICL algorithm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-20T15:58:54Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.